Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. will give free weapons to Afghan civilians

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 01:21 PM
Original message
U.S. will give free weapons to Afghan civilians
from RawStory: http://rawstory.com/news/2008/CNN_U.S._to_arm_Afghan_civilians_1226.html

Saturday December 27, 2008

One way to quell a violent and deteriorating situation, according to the U.S. military, is to flood the place with guns.

That's exactly what is planned for Afghanistan, where a rising tide of chaos is slowly pushing the country past Iraq as the most dangerous battlefield Americans tread upon.

"The U.S. military plans to help the Afghanistan government recruit, train and arm local Afghans to fight a resurgent Taliban," reported CNN's Barbara Starr.

"For the United States, the most sensitive part of the proposal will be the use of American military funds to purchase small arms, most likely AK-47 rifles, that will be given to local Afghans, according to a U.S. military official."

"There are worries," Starr continued, "putting even more weapons in the hands of local communities could lead to tribes fighting each other instead of the Taliban. U.S. troops could get caught in the middle." The plan would also hinge upon the weak Afghan government to maintain the loyalties of the newly armed populace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hey!
I wouldn't mind having one of those AK's...

Agent Mike? Are you listening?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. blessed peacemaker
are you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. In all seriousness...the tactic of flooding the region with guns has "bad idea" written all over it.
Edited on Sat Dec-27-08 01:33 PM by adsosletter
I still wouldn't mind having one of those AK's though...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Like the "Fortified Villages" that worked so well in Vietnam.
Another brilliant plan from the geniuses in the Pentagon doomed to fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Now when we shoot up groups of civilians we can do it with a clear conscience
because they were armed. No more guilt afterwards for killing women and children because "the armed men folkterrorests were using them as shields".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. well, look on the bright side.
when our troops are fired on by Afgan civilians, there won't be any reason not to destroy the entire villages anymore. Just out and out level the countryside. :argh:

sheesh, the brass is having a hard time explaining away civilian casualties at this point in time. Just think how much easier their job will become?

I'm sure we had a good reason for going into Afganistan, but what the hell, how long are we gonna keep on doing the same dumb shit over and over and over?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bragi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. This is now Obama's war
I presume he is on side with this lunatic strategy or the brass wouldn't be promoting it.

It is beginning to look like Afghanistan will be a cancer on Obama's presidency.

He should be figuring out how to end this war rather than escalating it.

- B
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Gates is posturing as if he has Obama's back
. . .but it's really still an open question what posture the Pentagon will assume with Bush gone. I agree that it appears that Mr. Obama isn't in opposition to this because of the relative silence from him and his transition team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. Similar ideas were floated for Bosnia
I don't know that this will get any more traction than those did in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC