Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Army Revises Upward Number of Desertions in ’06

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:11 AM
Original message
NYT: Army Revises Upward Number of Desertions in ’06
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/23/us/23awol.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

Army Revises Upward Number of Desertions in ’06

By PAUL von ZIELBAUER
Published: March 23, 2007

A total of 3,196 active-duty soldiers deserted the Army last year, or 853 more than previously reported, according to revised figures from the Army.

The new calculations by the Army, which had about 500,000 active-duty troops at the end of 2006, significantly alter the annual desertion totals since the 2000 fiscal year.

In 2005, for example, the Army now says 2,543 soldiers deserted, not the 2,011 it had reported. For some earlier years, the desertion numbers were revised downward.

National Public Radio first reported on Tuesday that the Army had been inaccurately reporting desertion figures.

A soldier is considered a deserter if he leaves his post without permission, quits his unit or fails to report for duty with the intent of staying away permanently. Soldiers who are absent without leave — or AWOL, a designation that assumes a soldier still intends to return to duty — are automatically classified as deserters and are dropped from a unit’s rolls if they remain away for more than 30 days.

Some Army officers link the recent uptick in annual desertion rates to the toll of wartime deployments and point to the increasing percentage of troops who are on their second or third tours in Iraq or Afghanistan.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Definitely NOT an insignificant number, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. And numbers were inaccurately reported until they got caught.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Exactly!
And, who knows how many have REALLY deserted.

This story should be front page news in all media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. "Follow the leader." - Commander AWOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yup -- good point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. "Thank you for your support." - Commander AWOL
"Loyal repulicons MUST stand behind their Chickenhawk leaders. You can be sure VP Dickie 'Five Military Deferments' Cheney & all the other republicon chickenhawks appreciate your kind words about our undistinguished records of military failure and desertion."

- Commander AWOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yup -- bizarro world, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. It pisses me off that these guys have to resort this.
Some of them have probably served 2 or 3 tours or more in Iraq and have had their enlistments extended well past the original date for their discharge. Now we're going to label them deserters? This country has been asking too much of them. They deserve better treatment and they shouldn't have to bare the burden beyond what they've signed up for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I totally agree; the negative connotation of the word 'deserter' probably
doesn't apply to the bulk of these soldiers. They should get mental healthcare, not be condemned for their actions. This admin 'deserted' the soldiers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC