Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"The Great American Restoration" June 2003. The more things change...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 04:57 PM
Original message
"The Great American Restoration" June 2003. The more things change...
Edited on Sat Jan-17-09 05:33 PM by madfloridian
The more they don't. These words sound like today in so many ways...but at least Bush is heading out the door.

A tribute to one who achieved so much for the Democrats. That's what he called his speech that day in Burlington when he announced his candidacy.

Hat tip to a Politico blogger for this reminder

The prophet of Dean

If Obama's still looking for inspiration, he should check out Howard Dean's '03 hat-in-the ring address, arch-Deaniac Joe Trippi suggests.

Dean, who has been spurned by the O folks, seemed to be about five-and-half years ahead of the O curve, urging America to"rejoin the word community" and warning of a looming economic crisis wrought by Bush's tax cuts, the lack of affordable health care and a beggared middle class.

A (bitter) taste:

"Our president and too many in Washington are giving away our future so that we pass to our children not a flickering flame of freedom but the chain of insurmountable debt... No parent would do this and America must not do this."


Many of the goals were accomplished, but now others are getting the garlands and rewards. That's just the way it goes, I hear.

The Great American Restoration

Governor Howard Dean June 23, 2003

Today, our nation is in crisis. At home, this crisis manifests itself in this President's destruction of the idea of community. This President pushes forward an agenda and policies which divide us. He advocates economic polices which beggar the middle class and raise property taxes so that income taxes may be cut for those who ran Enron.

He divides us by race by using the word quota, which appeals to the worst in us by instilling fear that people of color might take our jobs or our places in the nation's best universities. He divides us by gender by attacking a woman's right to make her own health care decisions. And even by attacking young women's right to have the same athletic opportunities that young men do. He divides us by sexual orientation by supporting senators who have slandered gay Americans, and he appeals once again to the worst instincts within us, instead of that which is good in all Americans.

The tax cuts that are the radicals' weapon are not about tax cuts for working people. They are not even about tax cuts for millionaires. Instead, the tax cuts are designed to destroy Social Security, Medicare, our public schools and our public services through starvation and privatization.

Our President and too many in Washington are giving away our future so that we pass to our children not a flickering flame of freedom but the chain of insurmountable debt.


No parent would do this and America must not do this.


And he spoke of a meaningless vocabulary used by politicians. It appears it may be used once again in the name of bipartisanship.

When confronted with a dedicated band of right wing ideologues, too many Americans have stopped participating, stopped voting, and stopped believing that they can change America.

And we in politics have not given our people a reason to vote or a reason to participate. We have slavishly spewed sound bites, copying each other while saying little. We raise millions of dollars and each year make lofty promises, while every year the struggles of ordinary Americans increase and fewer Americans vote. Our politicians, many of them good people, have been paralyzed by their fear of losing office. Our leaders have developed a vocabulary which has become meaningless to the American people.


Best to him in his new private endeavors. And to his endeavors working with center left parties abroad who do not shun his accomplishments as his own party has done here.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Moving on.
Leaving political life behind

Goals accomplished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. One more thing before it archives.
I think this comment needs to be said more than once. There is some bitterness over this after all the hard work of the last 4 years.

The Swampland

# Karen Tumulty Says:
Friday, January 9, 2009 at 9:42 am

PD: I don't think that would cut the legs out of the story at all. If Dean is magnanimous in public, it doesn't mean that he--or, just as importantly, the people he has worked with, who continue be important to the party--feel that way in private.
.
Nor does it excuse the Obama Team for refusing to make a small gesture that wouldn't have cost them a penny. It is a telling story. I just don't know precisely what it is telling us. Is this Rahm not letting go of old grievances? A signal that Obama's folks want to take the party in a different strategic and tactical direction?


I am not sure in the long run that this will prove to be wise, to as much as ask him to stay away when the new chair was announced. That has got to be unprecedented.

Obama appears with new Democratic chairman Kaine

Dean, however, did not attend the brief ceremony at the party's national headquarters in Washington. "My understanding is that he's traveling, so he couldn't attend," said Tommy Vietor, an Obama spokesman.

The DNC confirmed that Dean was traveling to American Samoa to attend the inauguration of the governor and raise money in what is his last stop in all of the country's 50 states and territories.

Obama's transition officials did not immediately respond when asked whether Dean was invited to appear with Obama and Kaine.

But Democrats with knowledge of the situation, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to avoid angering the Obama team, said Dean stayed away at the request of Obama advisers.


A simple gesture would have made so many of us feel comfortable and feel like all we had contributed the last few years mattered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks for the reminder K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. "Our leaders have developed a vocabulary which has become meaningless"
I thought of those words lately talking about post and bipartisanship. What does that mean? Pretty much one party.

Most people think it just means get along. I would like to think that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. yep - bipartisanship has been turned into moving past crimnality of the privileged for fake imagery
Edited on Sun Jan-18-09 01:14 PM by blm
of progress that never comes BECAUSE the American people are left unaware of the extent of criminality that has been done in their name and at their great expense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. "Post" means "after" as a prefix. We are going to move past party.
and become as one.

Someone tell me how that is going to work out when the other party is filled with extremists. :shrug:

Post Partisan means far more than getting along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. Pretty much one party when it comes to certain positions...
the recent resolutions supporting Israel and the prior resolutions condemning Iran only had a handful of dissenters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yes, you are right on that issue, and several others
on which stands are delayed or not taken. Or much caution used. Too often almost fearful to antagonize the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. And you are correct to include other issues that are never brought forth
for discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. kick!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. He could have been describing the situation today in our country.
So little has changed.

Thanks for the kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. In the 1968 elections I saw on TV a young girl in one of the Nixon campaign crowds,
holding up a sign: "Bring us together". I never forgot it, for some reason - especially because he didn't.

Every pres since has promised some variation on the theme, & none has fulfilled their promise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. Very nice speech
I do hope that some day before too long he has a very prominent role in U.S. politics. He was not my top pick in 2004, but if he ever runs again he very well may be.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I doubt he will ever run again.
He spoke clearly and cut through the BS...it was what brought hubby and me into politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC