Three thousand two hundred and thirty four (3,234) of our troops have been killed in Iraq as of this morning. It is a horrible, if unsurprising, number. However there is another number, one concerning non-mortal casualties that seems more striking in that it goes without explanation.
Bear with me for a moment. 16, 412 troops have been wounded but not so seriously as to require air transport. About half that number (7,005) have been (presumably) more seriously wounded, their injuries requiring air transport. Almost as many (6,835)of our troops have been injured by non-hostile action - a sure sign of poor supervision and training. Those numbers provide the background for the number which makes little sense.
The number that seems so out of place is the number of troops afflicted with diseases of such severity as to require "Medical Air Transport". 18,704 troops fit into that category This number of our troops who were so sick as to require air medical transportation exceeds the number who have been wounded and requiring the same by more than two times.
Setting aside what seems to be an under-reporting of wounded (one presumes under-reporting of casualties extends through each category) it is still very difficult to understand why more than twice as many of our troops are being evacuated for medical treatment from illness as from hostile action. The surprisingly large number of ill troops forces questions. What is making so many of them sick, so sick as to require emergency evacuation from their posts, and what becomes of them after treatment? How many die? Are deaths from illness reported along with other fatalities?
In summary:
16,412 minor wounds (not requiring medical air transport)
7,005 major wounds (require medical air transport)
18,704 diseases (require medical air transport)
http://icasualties.org/oif/On Edit: Corrected typo noted below