Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fucking outrageous: Family planning stripped from stimulus bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:03 PM
Original message
Fucking outrageous: Family planning stripped from stimulus bill
WHY are we caving to this? WHY? With the economy in this "downturn"...an unplanned pregnancy could be the difference between survival...or not.:mad:


Dear xxxxxx

I'm stunned. We've just confirmed news reports that provisions
to expand access to affordable family planning will be stripped
from the economic stimulus bill. Removing this provision is a
betrayal of millions of low-income women, and it will place an
even greater burden on state budgets that are already strained
to the breaking point.

We need you to take action now by calling the White House and
voicing your support for the Medicaid Family Planning State
Option. Call the White House comment line at 202-456-1111 to
speak out now -- click here for more details on what to say, and
to let us know you called:
I was frustrated when I saw a parade of legislators and talking
heads on television this weekend spreading false information
about this commonsense bill. House Minority Leader John Boehner
even claimed that the provision would cost millions of dollars
-- when the fact is it would save the federal government $700
million over 10 years.

I was even more shocked to read today that congressional leaders
have taken these false arguments seriously and will remove
family planning provisions from the stimulus bill. It's time for
Washington to hear from the millions of Americans who support
commonsense policies that invest in health care and help ease
the economic downturn.

Call the White House at 202-456-1111 -- it's a quick and easy
way to make a big impact. Click here for more details on what to
say, and to report back to Planned Parenthood on your call:

Let me be clear. The Medicaid Family Planning State Option is a
simple way to make health care affordable for millions of
Americans. It would do two important things:

1. It would allow millions of women to obtain basic health
care. It would extend safety-net health care coverage for
millions who are losing their jobs and health insurance in the
economic downturn. Studies estimate that 2.3 million low-income
women would receive coverage under this provision by 2014, and
500,000 women would be able to avoid unintended pregnancies.

2. In these difficult times, this provision would save states
money. State budgets are being squeezed by the economic
downturn, just as millions are losing their jobs and health
insurance. The Medicaid Family Planning State Option not only
would help states extend their coverage, it would generate
savings for states and the federal government by expanding
access to preventive care.

Please, take two minutes now to help us raise a public outcry.
Click here for details you can use on your call, and to let us
know you spoke out:
Thank you so much for speaking out, and please stay tuned for
more details on this critical issue.

Sincerely,

Cecile Richards, President
Planned Parenthood Federation of America
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why can't this be voted-on on it's own?
Edited on Wed Jan-28-09 12:06 PM by Bleachers7
It barely fits into the purpose of the bill. Let it go to vote seperately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozu Donating Member (203 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
42. Exactly
It doesn't help anyone's credibility to start stuffing necessary legislation with tangentially related riders.

Let them stand and pass on their own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbonds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. This isn't a betrayal, it just means it isn't in this bill.
It really isn't a stimulus. I know it is needed, but it can be brought back in another bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I would agree but for other medical things being in the bill.
And I don't think any of it is really 'stimulus' spending, to be frank, but if other medical stuff is in there, then this needs to be there too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sorry, men are still in charge.
Mass transit has taken a huge hit in favor of highways also.

It stinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
45. Quite; mass transit would be better -- especially if electric cars and hybrids don't become the norm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
60. This is why Pelosi got dissed
She made a lot of sense, and tried to couch it in terms men could appreciate--dollars and cents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kookaburra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. I would think this would belong in the Health Care Bill anyway
Wouldn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobRossi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Condoms are cheap.
Personal responsibility is free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
dem629 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. So this program was offered to prevent unwanted pregnancies from rape?
:shrug:

That's a new one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Not just rape--but yes it is an issue
and you do know that boyfriends and husbands rape their partners?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dem629 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. You brought up unwanted pregnancies.
How many of those are due to rape?

It's quite clear that you're upset and hysterical over...something, who knows? But you've gone off the deep end with your claims in this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. You went off the deep end with your sexist statement
With your condescension and mightier than thou tone.
Contraception IS responsible and it is much cheaper to provide THAT than medical care for a pregnant woman and then that child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dem629 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. Ah, "SEXISM"! That's when you know you've run out of points to make.
I said nothing that was sexist, and you know it. But go ahead and have that little fantasy if it makes you feel good.

Looks like we agree that there is a measure of responsibility to be taken by both partners. Good deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Seriously
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
49. There is more to it than contraception.
Some diseases don't get transferred via semen.

At least contraception stops babies and there are treatments for most STDs. However, with sexuality, as with general health, an ounce of prevention vs a pound of cure. Food for thought. And I hate those magazine articles with the magical drugs and smiling person in the background. A sheer lie; the drugs for some of those STDs cause nasty side-effects. It is not worth half the aftermath by being irresponsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. So why dont all men use them rather than knock up women with kids they won't support?
But that's just the women's and kids' problem, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dem629 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. It's not just the woman's responsibility. It's 50/50, men and women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #23
47. No argument here; it is the responsibility of both involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #21
59. Make it sexual parity
If an insurance or Medicaid pays for Viagra, it should also pay for birth control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
46. Don your flamesuit, as I will don mine.
For I agree with you.

100%.

Sex education needs to tell more than the biological basics. It's about self-respect, respect for one's sexual partner, and repercussions which include disease or unwanted children. Cheating is disrespectful. So is impregnating someone and not taking the responsibility for their part in the baby making.

I tolerate abortion and I'd never force it on anyone, but I certainly don't like it that a life has to be expunged because somebody forgot their condom or preferred to use it to make a balloon doggie or giraffe. And, true, we have to work on post-birth living conditions as well.

We are sexual beings, true -- nobody is going to deny that. It's pretty obvious; most species tend to require sexuality.

We also happen to be human beings. We are not bunny rabbits. Personal responsibility, which includes thinking of the one you're with, is important. This is why I loathe one night stands. It's impersonal and some humans are also conniving and hurtful by nature. (Even when you do trust, it's possible they might cheat and that truly stinks; the devolved pigs...)

It's a complex issue. But there's nothing complex about self-respect and having respect for others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
50. Call 1-800-460-4939 free call courtesy of CREDO
to express your displeasure to Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and to Obama.

Poor women's needs should not come last.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm suspicious this part of the Bill was a "trojan horse" and will be
addressed at a later time. They got something now, fruitless to complain down the road..IMO of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
58. I agree 100%!!! This was not the bill to pass this family planning issue in. A health bill
which will come later will include it and will pass easily because it was knocked out once already. I'd imagine Obama knew very well that this would be a point of contention for the pukes, but that it would let him say, "okay, we're compromising, we'll remove this from the bill, now let's move on and pass this thing." The pukes feel that they "won" this battle, but they have just been played, yet again by a masterful and shrewd Obama.

I expect the first major health bill that comes to congress will include this exact family planning outline and that it will pass.

He's a few moves ahead, always.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dem629 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. Why do people need this program to prevent pregnancy?
Don't they have choices, like several inexpensive methods of preventing unwanted pregnancies, including the option of not being totally irresponsible and getting pregnant?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
dem629 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Clearly you have no point to make.
Vent your faux anger all you want. You're tiresome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. and you are in the wrong place
I wonder if it is on purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dem629 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. Thanks for proving my point. You have nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. There are no inexpensive women-controlled BC methods
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dem629 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Responsibility is 50/50 between man and woman, and condoms are cheap.
There are also methods that are free, if you know what you're doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. There are no inexoensive women-controlled bc, and you HAVE to be kidding
It doesn't matter if you know what you're doing -- they don't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dem629 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. Please consult your 8th-grade sex-ed teacher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #37
53. I don't have to, I know that is is NO safe free method
My best frined is a result of that "BC" method.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #53
56. I have a younger sister as the result of that "method", too
In the meantime, I get the general impression that the poster we're answering doesn't know the first damn thing about it.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #32
40. This one might be a believer in Abstinence.
We all know how well those virginity vows work out. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. Q: What do you call couples who practice the Rhythm Method?
A: Parents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dem629 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. May I respectfully offer this thought: Putting this type spending int o
the Stimulus Legislation gives the GOP a way to get on every program
and ridicule the Stimulus.

This type program (STD) is noble but it becomes an earmark when
put into the Broader Stimulus.

The STD Program should be considered but at a later time.

Why does our party insist on marginalizing the President's Legislation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I'm sure the Gays will gladly share room at the back of the bus for the women
Since this party is so intent on marginalizing them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
62. The GLBT/Women's Alliance is going to be more important than ever. We see which way the wind blows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. Why was this in the stimulus bill in the first place? I thought we
were talking about building roads and getting people back to work. I understand the problems with an unexpected pregnancy but I think this needs to be addressed separately or else the stimulus will look like a liberal's wet dream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think it was a decoy**nm
**
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmileyRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
20. Why is not increasing spending being reported as a CUT.
I don't think they are taking away the spending already in place for this, they are just not adding new money. Granted we probably could use it as I have no doubt more women are requesting services now that the job is lost and so are the medical benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
25. Nothing Outrageous About It. It Wasn't Really Necessary In This Bill.
It was a tough sell to begin with, and with the immediacy this bill requires as it relates to direct economic impact, it probably wasn't the best place for it. I'm sure in the future it will be passed along with something else, but taking it out of THIS bill was just simply good politics with good logic. Not a rational thing outrageous about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. I love when OMC and I agree
It's like spotting a rare butterfly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #25
36. They probably put it in to begin with
so they'd have something to take out and appear to be appeasing the dickhead right...which in turn gets the stimulus passed in return for trading out something they never expected to keep.

Just a thought.

I'm pretty sure it will be back in short order, and with the intention of being passed. If pulling this keeps hundreds of thousands of teachers from getting laid off (see: NYT today), it was a worthy retreat, and we'll get it back in a different bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. I'd Consider That To Be The Overwhelmingly Most Likely Scenario.
Every major bill has them, and this one seemed perfect to fill the role.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
48. Agreed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanctified Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
31. Doesn't an unplanned pregnancy increase spending?
You know what would not be a bad idea is to ask every couple who makes over $100k a year to have a baby in the name of increasing spending and fixing the economy. If we had a rich baby boom right now that would flood the economy with new dollars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
43. How long have you been following politics?
You have been incredibily ignorant over the past few months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #43
51. Coming from such a neophyte
I'll take that as a compliment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #43
65. Cecile Richards's biography
call her a lot of things, but ignorant of politics is a laugh.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cecile_Richards

Cecile Richards is the current president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America. She previously founded and served as president of America Votes, a coalition of more than thirty national organizations. Before that she was deputy chief of staff to Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic majority leader in the U.S. House of Representatives. She has also worked at the Turner Foundation.
She is the daughter of former Texas governor Ann Richards. She attended St. Stephen's Episcopal School in Austin, Texas and graduated from Brown University in 1980. In 1995, she founded the Texas Freedom Network. She is married to Kirk Adams, a labor organizer with the Service Employees International Union, and has three teenage children. She lives in New York City.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
44. Obama using Ortega Nicaragua playbook-Left allies with Church against Women to get re-elected

The sooner women create alternatives to total dependence on Left , the greater our chances for freedom and equality.

Rick Warren/Obama Alliance is designed to be mutually beneficial to them---throw in Obama's silence on plight of women in certain Muslim countries is to see handwriting on the wall.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NavyDavy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #44
52. I think ur in some fantasy world if you think that is what President
Obama did.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #52
61. I think the new Left-Church Alliance is real, known to Obama, and dangerous to women.

He had an opportunity to stand strong for women's health and women in poverty and he chose to strengthen his alliance with backward religious leaders who will deliver votes to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
54. I know, it's ridiculous
Contraception should be a key player for a successful stimulus. :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
55. of course it got taken out of the bill
all the republicons did was go on tv and snicker and talk about how obama put contraceptives in a stimulus bill, making dirty little jokes about what exactly would be stimulated by this.

they are such motherfuckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
57. I actually like the stimulus bill to be filled with stimuli and not a laundry list of good things
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
63. And why are women's issues being used as "bait" or a political
football once again? I notoce that theire is still NOTHING on FOCA and it was "promised that it would be the very first legislation signed. Well, it wasn't was it? Whatever.Political mCapital could have been used to get it out od committee but I guess as a "fringe" issue it it wasn't "important enough.:sarcasm: But its all okay. We are funding family planning overseas! ( not that that isn't a good thing but American women should be helped first!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThisThreadIsSatire Donating Member (697 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
64. I'm hoping they'll still do it through
Health & Human Services...

That would be a sensible solution that can be done without holding up the stimulus plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC