Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Holder Aide: We Made No Special Promises to Bond

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 04:54 PM
Original message
Holder Aide: We Made No Special Promises to Bond
Holder Aide: We Made No Special Promises to Bond
By Elana Schor - January 28, 2009, 4:35PM

My colleague Zack at TPMmuck just heard from an aide to Attorney General nominee Eric Holder. The aide definitively denied Sen. Kit Bond's (R-MO) claim that Holder had given him "assurances" of avoiding future prosecutions of Bush intelligence officials who engaged in torturous interrogations.

"Eric Holder has not made any commitments about who would or would not be prosecuted," the aide said via e-mail. "He explained his position to Senator Bond as he did in the public hearing and in his responses to written questions."

The aide pointed to Holder's written response to a question from Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ):

Prosecutorial and investigative judgments must depend on the facts, and no one is above the law. But where it is clear that a government agent has acted in "reasonable and good-faith reliance on Justice Department legal opinions" authoritatively permitting his conduct, I would find it difficult to justify commencing a full-blown criminal investigation, let alone a prosecution.

snip

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/01/holder-aide-we-made-no-special-promises-to-bond.php

GREAT NEWS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Republicons & Allied Propaganda Puppets lying again?
Edited on Wed Jan-28-09 04:56 PM by SpiralHawk
OMG! Who'd a thunk it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 04:57 PM
Original message
So this leaves a path clear to investigating and prosecuting
those who crafted and ordered actions BASED on these "legal opinions" of the Justice Dept??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Holder leak was probably face saving bullshit from the republicans
To make it look like they didn't cave. They took an indefensible position in the first place, so they put themselves in this position. Morans!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Repugs will do anything to derail this appointment. It wouldn't surprise...
Edited on Wed Jan-28-09 04:59 PM by LakeSamish706
me to hear that Rove was initiating this whole endeavor to get Holder out of this position. They are all scared shitless of this guy as AG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I hope kkkarl is one of the first to go down.
I will dance in the street the day that man faces the justice he attempted to subvert!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I agree, hope they hang him from highest light standard.... He is despicable. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. then the washington times should lose their license.....or whatever
Edited on Wed Jan-28-09 05:01 PM by spanone
it's still prominent on their website
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. AG Holder - Prosecute Kit Bond first. Thank you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. Thank you. Kit Bond - you suck. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. His statement contradicts itself.
Edited on Wed Jan-28-09 05:14 PM by mmonk
He says no one is above the law and at the same time says there won't be a full investigation on illegal activities if the person was acting on good faith reliance on Justice Department legal opinions. I have not heard of the Justice Department superseding the Constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights. Just where in the Constitution is that article or where is that statute?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. The Republicans need to push this hard. Insist on full immunity...
Make a nice fat list of allegations and accused parties. Demand in the loudest maximum terms that Holder make individual assurances of never pursuing any of these cases as a condition of his appointment. Have party leaders Sarah Palin and Rush Limbaugh do a joint press conference calling for a nationwide Freeper mobilization in defense of blanket eternal immunity for every last Bush regime member.

Don't back down!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. I really think the target might be the Justice scandal and
not the torture, necessarily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC