Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NSF and porn

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 11:35 AM
Original message
NSF and porn
Great, now the anti-intellectuals have leverage over the NSF budget.


http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2009/01/28/Grassley_calls_for_NSF_porn_surfing_probe/UPI-33381233169317/

Grassley calls for NSF porn surfing probe
Published: Jan. 28, 2009 at 2:01 PM
Order reprints | Feedback
Sen. Chuck Grassley

WASHINGTON, Jan. 28 (UPI) -- U.S. Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, says he wants to know more about a National Science Foundation probe that found employees surfing pornography Web sites.

Grassley, the ranking minority member of the Senate Finance Committee, has ordered the NSF's inspector general to send him all documents relating to an in-house investigation that found "numerous reports" of NSF officials spending large amounts of time viewing porn and engaging in sexually explicit online "chats," the Washington publication Politico reported Wednesday.

The allegations were tucked into the foundation's 68-page semiannual report to Congress under the heading "Abuse of NSF IT Resources." It cited one instance in which an NSF "senior official" was found to have spent as much as 20 percent of his working hours over a two-year span "viewing sexually explicit images and engaging in sexually explicit online 'chats' with various women," Politico said.

"The semiannual report raises real questions about how the National Science Foundation manages its resources, and Congress ought to demand a full accounting before it gives the agency another $3 billion in the stimulus bill," Grassley said. An NSF spokeswoman told Politico the agency had no comment on the report or its content.

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. I betcha Senate staffers never, ever, ever, ever EVER EVER look at porn online. Ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. More anti-science hoseshit from the folks that underfunded science over the last 8 years
Edited on Thu Jan-29-09 11:47 AM by jpak
How much time do republic House and Senate staff members spend surfing porn.

Glass houses and all that.

Grassley should investigate the behavior of republic Senators in public bathrooms and House members sexually abusing pages.

Yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. The director of the NSF is a presidential appointment, so perhaps the
person that Obama appoints will clean up any messes that festered under Bush's appointee.

At the same time, I'd be curious to see the internet logs from Grassley's office... ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. Why JUST the NSF?
This is a problem in all govertment agencies...Does anyone really think that people at the Pentagon, CIA etc don't do this?
Sounds like the luddites creationist crowd is looking for a chance to keep control over those dangerous scientific "ideas"..:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. +1
does the good senator 'really' want to go there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yep. Notice he wants to use this as an excuse to hold up funding
Not to get to the problem itself. Bastards never stop, do they.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmileyRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. NSF - Non sufficient funds
I honestly am so not surprised. I'd take a bet in a heartbeat that every gubmit computer in this country with internet access has been used for porn unless there's a damn good "nanny" filter on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Salviati Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. For pete's sake...
Edited on Thu Jan-29-09 12:11 PM by Salviati
Can't those pervs keep their pants on for 8 hours a day? I mean I'm a perv, and I have managed to never use a work or school computer to surf pr0n... I mean you should just assume if you're on a work computer or internet connection that you're being watched 100% of the time. I honestly don't care about what people do in their own homes, and I understand that to some extent personal business is going to be done on work computers, (shopping, updating netflix queue, etc...) but if pr0n is something that someone can't live 8 hours without, then I assure you that it's going to take up MUCH more time on the job than would be acceptable for ANY personal related activity...

(And this goes for the rest of the guys working for us in other agencies as well... You can't tell me that there aren't some people with serious voyeur fantasies over at the NSA and CIA who are doing lots of things they shouldn't...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC