Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senators Feinstein and Brownback Introduce Lung Cancer Mortality Reduction Act

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 01:00 PM
Original message
Senators Feinstein and Brownback Introduce Lung Cancer Mortality Reduction Act
Senators Feinstein and Brownback Introduce Lung Cancer Mortality Reduction Act

-Goal is to cut lung cancer deaths in half by 2015-

Washington, D.C. –Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Sam Brownback (R-Kan.) today introduced legislation requiring the government to make fighting lung cancer a priority by better coordinating federal research initiatives and speeding up the development of prevention drugs and treatments for lung cancer.

When the National Cancer Act was passed in 1971, lung cancer had a 5-year survival rate of only 12 percent. After decades of research efforts and scientific advances, the survival rate remains at only 15 percent. In contrast, the 5-year survival rates of breast, prostate, and colon cancer have risen to 89 percent, 99 percent and 65 percent respectively.

“Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death in both men and women, but funding of research and innovative new drug therapies have lagged behind that of other cancers,” said Senator Feinstein, who co-chairs the Senate Cancer Coalition along with Senator Brownback. “This needed legislation would boost funding and expand research into possible preventive treatments of this deadly disease. It’s time for the federal government to make fighting lung cancer a national priority.”

“More research and funding are certainly needed to stop the unnecessary suffering and death caused by lung cancer,” said Senator Brownback. “Senator Feinstein and I are committed to making cancer prevention and treatment a priority; the legislation we introduced today will save lives.”

The Lung Cancer Mortality Reduction Act of 2009 also would improve current tobacco cessation programs and disparity programs within the Department of Health and Human Services and create a lung cancer early detection research program for veterans who may be at higher risk for lung cancer.

“I believe that we have the expertise and technology to make serious progress against this deadly cancer, and to reach the goal of halving lung cancer mortality by 2015,” Senator Feinstein said. “This legislation will ensure that our government’s resources are focused on this mission in the most efficient way possible. Every part of the National Institutes of Health that may have some ideas to lend should be participating.”

Bill Summary

The Lung Cancer Mortality Reduction Act of 2009 will renew and improve the federal government’s efforts to combat lung cancer. It will:

* Affirm the goal of a 50 percent reduction in lung cancer deaths by 2015.
* Authorize a Lung Cancer Mortality Reduction Program, with interagency coordination, to develop and implement a plan to meet this goal.
* Authorizes $75 million for lung cancer research programs in the National Heart Lung Blood Institute (NHLB), National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) and National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) and Centers for Disease Control (CDC).
* Create a new incentive program in the Food and Drug Administration modeled after the Orphan Drug Act to develop chemoprevention drugs for lung cancer and precancerous lung disease. These are drugs that could prevent pre-cancer from progressing into full blown disease.
* Better coordinate tobacco cessation programs and disparity programs to ensure that the burdens of lung cancer on minority populations are addressed.

http://feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=NewsRoom.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=19e420e8-b1a9-1ea5-daaf-abcd01e3aac6
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. And of course, zero dollars on discouraging tobacco use n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. There's a ton of money spent on that already - but while they do things
like ban smoking inside a building - they never ban vehicles from the parking lot. Amazing how the industries have been branded so that people think that one sort of second hand smoke is worse for us than the other one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Don't we need this money for foreign "wars"?
If we spend money for things like this how will Halliburton ever survive? I mean come on people there is killing to be done and property to be destroyed..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildClarySage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. I just wish this had been done five years ago.
I lost my dad last year to lung cancer. Its a horrible way to go. But better late than never, and hopefully we can increase the survival rate significantly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I lost my father and my uncle to lung cancer last year...
Last year sucked the big one.

I'm sorry for your loss, WildClarySage...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC