Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Brookings Study Confirms Bulk Of Housing Bubble Arose Under Solid GOP Rule

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 04:22 PM
Original message
Brookings Study Confirms Bulk Of Housing Bubble Arose Under Solid GOP Rule
The corporate media and GOP are working overtime to try to spin the current recession as the fault of the Democrats notwithstanding the fact that the GOP controlled all three branches of government until 2007. GOP members of Congress are being interviewed by the cable networks at far greater frequency than their Democratic counterparts while the RW media is still pushing the theme that the media has a liberal bias.

When, oh when, will a major network ask the question of whether the MSM has a right wing bias? Never.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/01/29/economic.crisis.explainer/index.html?iref=mpstoryview

/snip

On its face, there is nothing devious or illegal about a high interest "subprime" loan. Its simply a case of lender taking on a higher risk and receiving a higher interest rate in return.

However, nearly half of the loans made in 2006 were of the subprime variety, which increased the risk of borrowers defaulting on many banks' balance sheets.

"Prime mortgages dropped to 64 percent of the total in 2004, 56 percent in 2005 and 52 percent in 2006," the Brookings study notes.

Even so, many banks and brokerage firms continued bundling the mortgages, many of them bad loans, and Wall Street kept buying them and selling them to investors. And the people who could have put a brake on the increasing amount of risk -- the agencies that regulate the U.S. financial sector -- weren't paying attention.

/snip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. If the rating agencies would've acted morally, this wouldn't be as bad as it is
But, they chose to rate trash paper as AAA, because they made more money off rating a mortgage-backed security or asset-backed security than they did a corporate bond (and the higher they rated them, the more investors wanted them).

Why do private rating agencies get to decide what is a good investment? Why do they get so much power as to downgrade an entire country, if they so choose, with zero accountability?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Media ignored 2004 plank in Dem platform addressing upcoming credit/mortgage crisis
that was specifically placed there by Dem nominee. No GOPs had to argue against it and no Dems had to bolster it, because newsmedia WOULDN'T DISCUSS IT. Not SEXY enough for them - neither was Kerry's call to immediately fund the 16 billion dollar project to strengthen the Gulf Coast and its levees. Gee - why would any newsmedia be interested in THAT boring subject in 2004?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Also there was too too much overbuilding
Banks were too free just doling out money to contractors and investors. I see tons of empty new houses out in the middle of farm fields. In fact, I just saw one where there was a farm and butt up on two sides were housing projects. Ugly ones. We have a brand new on the Mississippi River set of town homes that have been empty for two years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ecumenist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Amen Glinda!! Same thing here in the Sacramento Valley...
There are a number of abandoned half finished subdivisions here in Sactown, the nearest within walking distance and it was LOVELY farmland just 2 years ago. This subdivision has 8 empty models and about 50 acres of stubbed out lots surrounded by chain link fencing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yup! Funny how the world could use food but it is like a nasty devious plot when
they planted the projects right in the middle of farm land. Even my elderly mother kept complaining that in Minneapolis and burbs, there was too much housing being built. That was four-five years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ecumenist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Well, I tell you what... I talked my husband into buying 25 acres of land
in North-northwestern California. It had LOVELY WATER,( one of the best aquifers on the west coast! Contractor told us that putting our well was like placing a straw in the ocean). We're building a home but it will be completely independent and self sustaining. Planning on putting in a large solar array and wind power too. Will be growing our own food too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. No surprise. The party of uber-materialism...
...is going to foster a society that believes everyone should expect to have any size home they want just because their ego demands it.

In our town, not far from us are block after block of perfectly wonderful, well kept, safe city neighborhoods loaded with two and three bedroom houses of modest size that were built in the first half of the 20th Century. For many years, they were perfectly acceptable as places to raise families and see the owners through life and into retirement.

Nowadays, they are occupied by Americans in their 20s and 30s who see them as nothing more than "starter homes," places best left before the children enter middle school in order to find McMansions or sprawling ranch houses with more room than the owners can manage.

It's disgusting how different the priorities and expectations of many of these people are now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. Well of course it did, the rest is just bullshit, it was all part of bush's 'ownership society'...
and America's service economy he helped introduce with his blind, liaises fare eye. All those republican financial instruments, mechanisms, privatizations and all out from under regulation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. 6 months before November elections in 2004, SEC unbridled banks.
Viola! The economy LOOKED BETTER, and looked good, and then backloaded a bunch of overly leveraged time bombs into itself ready to go off when either a Dem or McCain took office -- did not matter which.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. Considering the housing market started to burst in mid-2006, I say "No shit".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC