Bin Laden not determined to attack the US after 9/11?
by Quincy Adams
Bin Laden may have had no intention to attack the US again after 9/11. This sheds further doubt on the Bush administration's claim to have "kept us safe" since.
I've just noticed an article called The Unraveling by Peter Bergen and Paul Cruickshank in the New Republic
http://www.peterbergen.com/bergen/services/print.aspx?id=346 from late Spring 2008. The article discusses several Islamic militants who have come to preach against Al Qaeda. This has been reported elsewhere, but perhaps not so succinctly.
The new thing to me in the article was an account of a summer 2000 meeting in Kandahar -- a global jihadist strategy session hosted by Bin Laden. One attendee, the Libyan Noman Benotman, complained that Bin Laden's war against the U.S. -- the "far enemy"-- would impede his efforts against secular Arab governments -- the "near enemy." They quote Benotman as follows:
"We made a clear-cut request for him to stop his campaign against the United States because it was going to lead to nowhere," Benotman recalls, "but they laughed when I told them that America would attack the whole region if they launched another attack against it."
Benotman says that bin Laden tried to placate him with a promise: "I have one more operation, and after that I will quit"--an apparent reference to September 11. "I can't call this one back because that would demoralize the whole organization," Benotman remembers bin Laden saying.
This is the first evidence I have heard that Al Qaeda may have formed an explicit intention against further attacks on the United States.
more at:
http://www.samefacts.com/archives/terrorism_and_its_control_/2009/01/bin_laden_not_determined_to_attack_the_us_after_911.php