Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Mexico's medical cannabis regulations: Just one more bureaucratic dime-bag

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Fly by night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 08:15 PM
Original message
New Mexico's medical cannabis regulations: Just one more bureaucratic dime-bag
(The following article appeared today in the (on-line) Drug War Chronicles. It is reprinted here in its entirety with the permission of the author and the publication. If nothing else, the article seems to answer the question: How many attorneys does it take to screw up good legislation? In New Mexico, the answer appears to be "6". It took six well-paid attorneys fifteen months past the legislatively mandated deadline to release regulations that are unworkable, uninformed and unlikely to help 99%+ of eligible New Mexico patients to access medical-grade cannabis when they need it at a reasonable price. Given how much passive aggressiveness has surrounded the delay in the development of New Mexico's regulations, that may in fact have been the intent of at least some of those six attorneys.)

Feature: New Mexico Issues Regulations for Nonprofit Medical Marijuana Grows (Drug War Chronicle, Issue #570, 1/30/09)

Earlier this month, the New Mexico Department of Health issued its long overdue regulations for state-licensed, nonprofit medical marijuana providers, making it the first state to do so. Advocates say the new rules will allow for expanded access to medical marijuana for qualified patients. Not everyone is happy.

The process was long and involved, with numerous state agencies and law enforcement entities, as well as patients and advocates all trying to ensure that their interests and concerns were met. Originally mandated to be done by October 2007, the regulations were only finalized this month, with the Department of Health making late revisions based on public comments to earlier versions.

Under the newly promulgated regulations, nonprofit providers can grow no more than 95 plants, including both mature plants and seedlings, and can possess an amount of medical marijuana "that reflects current qualified patient needs." The nonprofits must sell medicine at constant unit prices and without volume discounts.

In order to apply for provider status, the nonprofits must provide copies of their articles of incorporation and bylaws, a list of all people involved in operating the facility, a list of all people who have a 5% or greater ownership in the facility, and have a board of directors that includes at least one health care professional and three qualified New Mexico medical marijuana patients. All of these people must also undergo a criminal background check.

But wait, there's more. As the regulations state:

All applicants must develop, implement and maintain on the premises policies and procedures relating to the medical cannabis program. At a minimum, the policies and procedures will include the following criteria:

* Distribution criteria for qualified patients or caregivers appropriate for medical cannabis services.
* Distribution criteria must include a clear identifiable photocopy of each registry identification card of a qualified patient and the patient's caregiver (if applicable) who are served by the nonprofit.
* Policies and procedures relating to an alcohol and drug free workplace program.
* A job description or employment contract developed for all employees, which includes duties, authority, responsibilities, qualifications and supervision.
* A personnel record for each employee that includes an application for employment and a record of any disciplinary action taken.
* On-site training curriculum, or enter into contractual relationships with outside resources capable of meeting employee training needs, which includes but is not limited to:
a) Professional conduct, ethics and patient confidentiality.
b) Informational developments in the field of medical cannabis.
* Training in security measures and specific instructions on how to respond to an emergency, including robbery or a violent accident.
* All nonprofits will prepare training documentation for each employee and have employees sign a statement indicating the date, time and place the employee received training and topics discussed, to include the name and title of presenters. The nonprofit will maintain documentation of an employee's training for at least six (6) months after termination of employment.

The new regulations also require patients who are growing their own to submit an application. Patients can grow up to four flowering plants and 12 seedlings. They can also possess up to six ounces of usable marijuana.

"We have worked hard to create a medical cannabis program that will be viable and meet the needs of patients in New Mexico," said Health Secretary Dr. Alfredo Vigil when the regulations were announced. "Now patients can get medical cannabis for their chronic health conditions in a way that is safe and legal under state law."

"I think the regulations will serve the patients of New Mexico well," said Melissa Milam, administrator of the Medical Cannabis Program in the state Department of Health. "I'm really happy that we are moving forward; I think that's better than to continue having this drawn-out debate over the regulations."

The first application by a nonprofit organization was accepted last week, said Milam. "We expect several more soon," she added. One hold-up, she said, was the requirement that all members of the nonprofit's board of directors pass a background check. "We're asking them to do that through the state Department of Public Safety, and those take about two weeks to process," Milam said.

Advocates are hoping the new regulations are a first step only. "We were able to get a lot of the changes we wanted into the regulations, so we're glad that the governor's office was receptive, but we didn't get everything we wanted," said Reena Szczepanski, head of the Drug Policy Alliance New Mexico office, which worked closely with Gov. Richardson for years to push medical marijuana through the legislature. "There will be room in the future to look at things like the regulations on nonprofits and plant limits."

That's because the regulations call for an annual evaluation report, Sczcepanski said. "We were able to get that yearly evaluation in there, and that will give us a chance to look at revisions in the future in light of how well the program is meeting the needs of patients. We also wanted state-run providers and didn't get that. That's another thing we can look at in coming years," she said.

Some advocates wish the department had gotten it right the first time around. Bernie Ellis, MA, MPH, an epidemiologist with more than 20 years experience in substance abuse-related research and administration, is one of them. Ellis has worked for medical marijuana in New Mexico for years, dating back to the days of Gov. Gary Johnson. Ellis also brings with him the bitter experience of a federal medical marijuana prosecution in Tennessee where he currently resides. He submitted detailed recommendations on the regulations during the public comment period last year, which interested readers can obtain by contacting him via the link above.

"The biggest frustration that I share with other medical marijuana activists nationally is that the New Mexico legislation could have been the gold standard for administering medical cannabis programs, but instead it has turned out to be just one more 'same old-same old' program with unrealistically low limits on the amount of cannabis patients can possess and providers can grow," said Ellis. "Limiting patients to no more than six ounces of medicine means that patients who grow outdoors will face arrest for possessing any more cannabis than their first six weeks supply. Limiting providers to 95 plants, including those in vegetative growth, means the producers will be able to produce medicine for no more than six patients apiece."

According to Ellis, there are at least 46,000 New Mexicans whose medical conditions currently make them eligible for the state's program, and the state is now considering adding more qualifying conditions. "With these regulations, we are talking about the potential need to license about 7,500 producers (or more) to serve a population like that, instead of licensing a smaller number of producers who could produce at a more realistic level," he said.

Ellis had argued for much larger state-licensed medicinal grows. "I have done preliminary cost and staffing estimates for providers growing an acre of cannabis, which would serve several hundred patients," he said. "There is no state better than New Mexico to do this right. The population there has centuries of medicinal use of this substance, the cultural climate is very favorable for success, and Gov. Richardson put a considerable amount of his own political capital to work to get this passed. But now, after a fifteen month delay releasing the program regulations, we have a program with unrealistically low limits on patients and providers, which will allow patents to be 'legal' only a few months of the year."

"The federal government doesn't seem to get involved with less than 99 plants or 99 pounds; that's where that number comes from," said Milam. "It is a measure to protect providers."

More importantly, said Milam, the patients seem satisfied. "No patients have complained to me about the plant limits," she said. "If they don't have a problem with it, I don't either."

The regulations contain a safety valve for patients, Sczcepanski noted. "If a need is indicated by their medical provider, patients can apply to possess amounts over the limit," she pointed out.

The limits on providers also have another negative consequence, Ellis argued. "With those sorts of limits, producers will not have the ability to reduce the price for medical cannabis below the current illicit price, which would defeat the goals of a program like New Mexico's," he said. "If you tell a nonprofit it is limited to 95 plants and it has to set up an elaborate security system and staff the effort commensurate with the security and horticultural needs, I don't see how they will be able to reduce the market price doing that. A larger, properly staffed facility could bring those prices down. Right now, the few providers I've talked to in New Mexico say they're just buying cannabis for patients from the illegal market and paying $200-$500 an ounce for it. I think if it were done right, we could get the cost down to around $50 an ounce."

"We're a very poor state, and many of the patients are on Medicaid or disability," said Milam. "California may have dispensaries everywhere, but they're charging black market prices. Our patients can't afford to pay $400 an ounce on top of their other medications. We're trying to set it up so marijuana is an affordable medication," she said, adding that she was sure licensed growers could beat black market prices.

"The state of New Mexico said it wanted to make cannabis available on demand to patients," Ellis continued, "but the way they're treating medical marijuana patients is analogous to telling a patient with a major infection that she needs penicillin immediately, and then handing her a loaf of bread and instructions on growing her own antibiotics. If a cancer patient has to undergo chemotherapy soon after diagnosis, he needs access to medical cannabis then, not five to seven months down the road when his first harvest might be ready."

Milam didn't disagree. "I've had doctors call me saying their patient needed medical marijuana on an emergency basis, and I have had to tell them to tell their patients to go find it themselves. This is a prime example of why the federal government needs to get marijuana rescheduled as Schedule II. The patients need to be able to go to the pharmacy and pick it up when they need it."

Despite his litany of criticisms of the new regulations, Ellis took pains to emphasize he supports the New Mexico medical marijuana program. "I am a proponent of the New Mexico approach as outlined in their legislation, but an opponent of the current regulations. Martin Luther King once said he would not have had the success he did in the civil rights arena without Stokely Carmichael and others agitating for change. I'm trying to be Stokely Carmichael on this. If we don't watch out, they can incrementalize us, and too many patients, to death."

There are currently 207 patients registered with the New Mexico Department of Health. Now, they will soon have the opportunity to procure their medicine through the nonprofits -- or at least a few months after one actually gets up and running. In addition to the one application already in process, said Milam, at least two more are going through the criminal background check requirement and should be applying soon.

Whether and how well the new regulations will serve the needs of patients remains to be seen. "We will be monitoring the implementation, and we've been doing that through this whole process," said Sczcepanski. "As these nonprofits are going forward, we will be watching to see if they are approved and if not, why not, and making sure the regs are being followed."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fly by night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. One self-kick for the Friday night OP log-jam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fly by night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. One more self-kick for cannabis sanity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. One heterokick
because the thread needs it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'll give you a Rec
and raise you a :kick: to sweeten the POT.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ms liberty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. kicking for Bernie...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fly by night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Thanks Ghost. If we never stop fighting, we cannot lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Any time, my friend... here's another kick
:kick:

Keep up the good fight brother, we'll win one of these days....


Peace,

Ghost

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oldenuff Donating Member (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. Non profit?

Exception for the Lawyers that is....nothing will screw things up more than putting an attorney (or attorneys) in charge. (feel free to replace the term lawyer/attorney,with politician)


It's absolutely amazing to me,that in a country that professes personal liberty...truth and justice,that this plant is still so demeaned and vilified...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BalancedGoat Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
8. I question the math used in the article.
"Limiting patients to no more than six ounces of medicine means that patients who grow outdoors will face arrest for possessing any more cannabis than their first six weeks supply"

They assume an ounce a week for the average patient. Assuming we're talking about good pot that seems like a lot to me. I understand that certain patients would require more than others, it just seems high for an average. That would be like going through around 65$ worth of pot a day based on the local market.

"Limiting providers to 95 plants, including those in vegetative growth, means the producers will be able to produce medicine for no more than six patients apiece."

An ounce a week per 6 patients over the course of a 16 week growth cycle (I took an average from figures listed here) would require 96 ounces. Their math seems to assume an average yeild of only around 1 ounce per plant. A good grower should be able to get a few times that.

That aside, I do agree with the points the author is trying to make. Just disagree with their math.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fly by night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. A response
I have provided medical cannabis to sick and dying people for the past two decades. The majority of these patients used about one ounce a week. Of course, I provided it free of charge so they did not have to ration a ridiculously expensive medicine but could use it as needed.

Your own math suggests that pot in your local area costs $400/ounce. It is not surprising that patients in your area would have to ration their medicine. BTW, I have heard of patients having to pay as much as $600/ounce. Just like privatized medicine, charging patients that much for medical cannabis is immoral.

As far as the ounce/week production, I would presume that most producers would choose to grow outdoors, since New Mexico's climate is ideal for superior medical cannabis production. If the producers follow the plant limits imposed by the state, they could not have any more than 24 plants in flowering state (the remaining 72 would have to be in vegetative state -- AND under 12 inches tall and twelve inches wide -- to be legal). Using the DEA estimates of four ounces of harvestable bud per plant (which, BTW, has been my general experience, though I have certainly produced more per plant occasionally and less more often), the producers' harvest would be about four pounds of bud to last those six patients for an entire year until the next harvest. That's a little more than 10 ounces per patient to last them the entire year.

If producers decide to grow indoors, they would still face the same limits. In that case, moving 12 inch tall vegetative plants to the flowering stage (and averaging 8 weeks from then until harvest) would result in plants that are still pretty small at harvest. One NM producer I know (who has decades of indoor experience) told me that two ounces of bud per plant would be an exceptional harvest, with one ounce per plant being more common under those circumstances. Neither of those harvest amounts would meet most patients' needs even in the short run, again in my experience.

I am sure the DEA is laughing out loud that, once again, fear of the feds has resulted in the castration of an excellent piece of medical cannabis legislation.

I am happy to share more about the problems with this New Mexico legislation if DUers will PM me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SsevenN Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Fly by night
Edited on Wed Feb-04-09 03:58 PM by SsevenN
Hello,

I am a New Mexico resident. I am a younger guy developing his career as a graphic artist.

I have issues including a repressed appetite, and a general anxiety that leads to depression when it goes on unchecked for extended periods of time. I have self-medicated (illegally, hmph) with cannabis my entire adult life to relieve my self of these issues. Until this point it has worked well enough, as I have always made enough to support my self and the ridiculous cost of my medication.

Unfortunately, my employer has now enacted a random drug test policy. I am in the middle of building a career, gaining experience, and expertise, and now this!

I am 100% unwilling to be forced upon other persciption medication, I refuse to be a guinea pig for others to test. I do not wish to undergo 'mood swings' and 'adjustments' to new, man-made cocktails. I have found a medication that works, and have been using it a long time, my life is good, and fulfilled, I don't need to start messing with that, especially now.

Obviously, I am a little nervous about going through the 'official' channels to obtain my medication. I've been treated like, and felt like a closet criminal for the last 8 years of my life. But in order to continue on my career path I need a *&%&^%* approval from big brother, or I will eventually either loose face with the company, or my job.

So please, fly by night. If you wouldn't mind, I need some local advise on what to do, and how to do it.

Since this is my first post, I can't P.M. you, or I would have. If you wouldn't mind setting me on the right direction, I would much appreciate it.

Thanks and good day.

Edited to add.

If anyone could P.M. fly by night to check this thread when he has a chance. That also would be much appreciated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
duhneece Donating Member (967 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. Good post, Bernie.
I'm watching all of this closely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wiley50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. Kick (to late to R)
Hang in there Bernie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC