Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

General Motors to Invest $1 Billion in Brazil Operations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 10:04 AM
Original message
General Motors to Invest $1 Billion in Brazil Operations
Source: Latin America Herald Tribune

SAO PAULO -- General Motors plans to invest $1 billion in Brazil to avoid the kind of problems the U.S. automaker is facing in its home market, said the beleaguered car maker.

According to the president of GM Brazil-Mercosur, Jaime Ardila, the funding will come from the package of financial aid that the manufacturer will receive from the U.S. government and will be used to "complete the renovation of the line of products up to 2012."

"It wouldn't be logical to withdraw the investment from where we're growing, and our goal is to protect investments in emerging markets," he said in a statement published by the business daily Gazeta Mercantil.

Meanwhile, he cut the company's revenue forecast for this year by 14% to $9.5 billion from $11 billion, as the economic crisis began to cause rapid slowdowns in sales.

Read more: http://www.laht.com/article.asp?CategoryId=12396&ArticleId=320909



Why are we funding jobs in Brazil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. because our leaders put corporations before people, just like always....
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well, is Congress aproval rating going up or down with the bailout vote ?
they were against the bailout before they voted for it......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. There had better not be one nut bolt or widget coming back to the US from this.
Let alone whole cars.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Hey, soon we'll all be bell-boys/girls for the Chinese Tourists driving Brazillian cars.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaybeat Donating Member (729 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. GM should build the same cars here they build there
Compact, four-door, four-cylinder bio-diesel fueled pickups? Brazil and the rest of the world has 'em, but not us.

How about we change CAFE standards so that every car company's US offering has to be as or more fuel efficient than the models they sell in any other country. Ford, Toyota, etc., they all do it.


(Chevy Colorado diesel, Thailand)


(Ford Ranger, Australia)


(Toyota Hilux, Asia)

Instead of whining that "American's need their pickups," how about we get a clue that the same companies sell us V-8s w/MPG in the single digits know the rest of the world won't buy 'em, so they don't sell them there. Instead, they sell cars that get 3-4 times the mpg.

How about no more government money (that includes local tax breaks--bribes--from you anti-union red state Republicans, too) unless you give us the best you've got (*and* build 'em here).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CRF450 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 05:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
52. lol, v8's get much better than "single digit" fuel milage.
Sure in a truck they get 15 or 16mpg, but in a lightweight car they can easily average in the 20's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shardik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. That's really going to help the economy.
In Brazil.

I'm so happy that my tax money is going to help create Brazilian jobs.

This is unfucking believable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. Time to bring back Tariffs. No more free trade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Tariffs won't stop GM from investing in Brazil, unless their operations there were going
to export to the US which I don't think is the case. It produces for the Brazilian market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
8. Err... thanks?
Please don't hate me, mmmkay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
9. That pisses me off. This is the reason we don't have jobs now.
Edited on Sat Jan-31-09 11:35 AM by firedupdem
They can do everything " some place else for cheaper" and meanwhile there is nothing here at home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
10. Our tax payer dollars at work. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChromeFoundry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
11. Off to the greatest.... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
12. mutherfoookers!! and in the meantime
Edited on Sat Jan-31-09 11:45 AM by Mari333
they are seeking Union concessions here

http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1875057,00.html


k n r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
13. I just posted a link to VP Biden's Middle Class Task Force - Guess what I am going to tell him?
You got that right - What are they thinking? We are dying here and GM is taking 1 Billion to Brazil???

Here is the link if you want to chime in!

http://www.whitehouse.gov/strongmiddleclass/

Say what?:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justaregularperson Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
51. I just emailed him too, If this is what they are going to do with taxpayer funds time to stop the
money!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluecollarcharlie Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. "This is unfucking believable!" There is a reason for that.
Somebody is throwing shit in the game. This same item was posted two months ago. Same story, words, same everything. And i'm a 100% convinced that this is completely false. Just doing a cursory search on Google News yielded the following results:

The Socialist World Worker reports that GM just announced 802 layoffs at it Sao Paulo plant even though it broke various sales records and got a ton of tax breaks and was profitable enough to send money northward to Detroit. No mention U.S. bailout money though.

Just123.com reports that GM's sales in Brazil were up 10%, where they sold 549,000 units. No mention of them getting money from anywhere.

Bloomberg reports that GM will layoff 1633 workers at it's Sao Caetano do Sul plant because of slowing sales. Again, no money from the U.S. seems involved.

The Latin Business Chronicle reports that the LAAM is the only region in which GM was profitable in the last quarter and that those 802 laid off employees i spoke of earlier were protesting because they got sacked and wanted their jobs back. Still no mention of US bailout money.

This story, as i said, has been kickin' around for the last two months. The original publication date, as far as i can tell, was 11-18-08. Right about the same time that GM, Ford and Chrysler went to Washington. Before this, no one had even heard of the Latin American Herald Tribune. Somehow it's suddenly become a gold standard in reporting? A paragon of truth? Why aren't more major organizations reporting this? Ask yourself that. I obviously do not know how to post links here, if i did i'd have done so. However, go do a Google search and you'll find the same stuff i did and if you look at the posting from Autoblog.com dated November 22. 2008 you'll see that this story has no basis in fact. You'll also find that this same nonsense was posted at Freerepublic as well.Like i said somebody is just throwing shit in the game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. Yep, this story seems like bullshit
And this 'Latin American Herald Tribune' looks to be uh...interesting. Just the bio on the 'President and Editor' raises red flags.

By the way, it's easy to do links here. Just type in (or copy/paste) the link address.

Here's a link to the Prez bio:

http://www.laht.com/article.asp?ArticleId=318362&CategoryId=13282
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. The part you find "uh...interesting" is what?
"Russ Dallen has worked for a number of leading publications all over the world. He worked as a foreign correspondent for Newsweek in London and an editor of the Journal of International Affairs in New York. He cut his teeth in the newspaper industry as a paper-boy for the New Orleans Times-Picayune in Gulfport, Mississippi at the age of 13. Since then, he has published numerous award-winning journal, magazine and newspaper articles and editorials, including in Newsweek, The Daily Telegraph (London), The Christian Science Monitor, The Daily Herald (Biloxi, Mississippi) and The Oxford Eagle (Oxford, Mississippi). He is author and contributing author of several scholarly works, including 4 books."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Oh, not his experience. His ties
Morgan Stanley, Oppenheimer, etc. And when a Capitalist Banker-friendly dude like that serves on Venzuelan/American "media" committees, it seems weird.

Plus this gem: As Editor-in-chief of The Daily Journal, Dallen took a lead in assisting in the spread of English-language, (with its associated culture and laws)

wtf does that mean?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. Oh, I see now. Yeah, glitch in the matrix stuff. well, apparently GM *is* investing 1 billion
in Brazil:

http://www.autoblog.com/2008/11/22/gm-not-sending-any-bailout-money-to-brazilian-operation

But it's not bailout money, which (imo) is a distinction w/o a difference, since GM's a centrally-managed multinational. However, GM's laying off in brasil too, though they built a state-of-the-art plant there in 2000.

As for US banking ties to Venezuela, they go back at least 100 years. Who knows exactly what the deep politics are, but fairly certain the standard public storyline on chavez/venezuela/gm/banking crisis/oil is bullshit.

If some faction of international bankers is publicizing the fact that GM's expanding in brasil & asking for bailout $$ at home, why might that be?

Several scenarios come to mind...but ordinary people can only guess which is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. DON'T BUY GM!!!! BOYCOTT!!!! Time to invest in NEW US AUTO COMPANY
Edited on Sat Jan-31-09 12:23 PM by goforit
COMPETE AGAINST THEIR ASSES AND WIN!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Township75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
17. And even the Dems pushed for the GM bail-out.
What a fucking disgrace! This shit pisses me off, becuase I know so many people out of work.

And now money we could have used to help people in hard times is going to make plants overseas so more of us will be out of work.

Brilliant!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
primavera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. American capitalism at its finest -n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
19. I can't believe nobody said this yet...
One brazillion dollars???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dave From Canada Donating Member (932 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
20. Because coporations can remain more competitive elsewhere. That's why high corporate tax rates are
ultimately a job killer, even though it may feel good to make them pay more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radicalman Donating Member (170 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Re: Corporate Taxes
Paul Krugman: "Now, the thing you have to realize about corporate taxes is that the statutory rate — the rate you pay after allowed deductions and all that — means very little. That’s because corporations have lots of potential deductions — and can hire the very best accountants to find them, and lawyers to justify them. So any time you see a table that compares the nasty 35% US rate with other countries, you know you’re being snowed.

"A much better indicator is the amount of taxes corporations actually pay. From OECD data (behind a paywall, I think, unfortunately), I get the following for percentage of GDP paid in corporate taxes in some major economies, in 2005:

Canada 3.5
US 3.1
Japan 4.3
France 2.8
Germany 1.7
UK 3.4."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bkkyosemite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Our citizens are being scammed big time. The lie about what is really happening goes on.
We will no longer be the most powerful country in the world because of the greed of the elite. They could care less just so they get their dough...Where is Karma when you need it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. As job-killers go, SarbOx is hard to top n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
21. What a minute, can I ask a question here?
First, I agree, this described most "lean" of all automobile assembly plants operation should be run without that money, absolutely.

But I want to be enlightened- Is it true that the UAW has no room in their agreements for their workers to co-exist with other companies who make things like Fisher Body used to in Detroit, but on site. So called "supplier integration" in that video looked really efficient, and must make these plants run "lean".

Would anyone explain the pro's and con's on this supplier integration thing where you basically have an agreement that your suppliers have a spot to manufacturer, send their assembly down the pike so that it is efficiently tied in to the car assembly?

Thanks in advance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antimatter98 Donating Member (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
23. In 2007, GM opened a 'green car' research center in China.
http://www.zimbio.com/Business+in+China/articles/17/GM+Invests+250+Million+China+Green+Research

GM to continue to invest in China:

http://news.alibaba.com/article/detail/business-in-china/100026817-1-gm-stick-china-investment-strategy.html

From GM China's website: http://www.gmchina.com/english
"GM takes seriously its responsibility to improve the lives of China's citizens by using its resources to contribute to their social welfare, and to build a cleaner, safer and healthier environment. "


So, tell me again why we are bailing out GM?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 05:22 AM
Response to Reply #23
53. check out the links between us car corps & chinese ones as well.
i think there aren't really any "national" car corps anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
24. Why isn't the Government demanding by law that none of it go elsewhere????
It is my money!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bkkyosemite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
26. I said in another thread something smells of all these U.S. companies layoffs like a jumping ship
but that something smells. This is what smells. They are laying off not because they have to but because they are using the economy as an excuse and shield to dump the U.S. citizens jobs for the cheaper labor of another country. They will still be able to be as greedy as hell and get their bonuses at our expense. Very worst expense of Americans having no jobs. This smells throughout the Universe.................And it was so obvious to me that day after day thousands of jobs being zapped. Watch the others who have dumped will follow GM.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
28. No. There should be a law. Our tax dollars must be spent in this country to upgrade
factories and conditions in our country.

Especially when it is given as a bail out to keep these companies going.

Either that, or that or the company has just sold us that much of their stock. Thus, we the people would become majority share owners.

I'm willing to bet that the people would vote to over turn the decision to send the bail outs and loans out of the country to fund jobs elsewhere... (Except, unless, of course, industry lobbiers get the jobs as the people's representative. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mayahbird Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
29. Senator Durbin
I copied your message and sent it to my Senator Durbin and my Rep. in Congress with the heading: How does this make you feel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
david13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
30. Hey, I don't buy GM anyway
Plus I was not the one to say bail them out. I said they have sunk themselves, let them go.
I wouldn't buy Ford or Chrysler ever again either.
dc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TommyO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Why wouldn't you buy a Ford?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
33. Tsk, tsk, silly people, you're thinking about this all wrong.
Our betters at CorpoCongressCEO-KleptoKrats., Inc., have merely rebalanced our investment portfolios for us, by allocating a portion of our dollars to an emerging market, namely Brazil.

An example of sound financial planning that will reward us all handsomely in our "Retirement Years."*

* Past results do not guarantee future performance; or a retirement, for that matter.

All investments carry risk (for you, the Little Guys, also known as Chumps, Suckers and Bag-Holders; Big-Shots make dough on the way up and on the way down; not to mention sideways.)

See prospectus for further details; the prospectus is not available to Little Guys; hey, just trust us; when have we ever steered you wrong before?


:banghead:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
34. They shouldn't be allowed to send even one penny of that bailout money out of this country.
This is getting ridiculous. But every time these corporate fat cats stick it to us in eye the government just goes ahead and gives them more money. Mark my word, GM will be back for more billions and they will probably get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
37. This is from Nov 2008
this is an article from Nov.
http://wordpress.com/tag/gm-brazil-mercosur-jaime-ardila /


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x4514151

GM not sending any bailout money to Brazilian operation
by Sam Abuelsamid on Nov 22nd 2008 at 8:49PM

A story has surfaced on the Latin American Herald Tribune (a publication we hadn't previously heard of) stating that General Motors was planning to invest $1 billion in it's Brazilian operations to update its South American products. So far, that part of the story is true. However, that's where the truth apparently ends. The story goes on to say that GM plans to use money obtained from the proposed government bailout package to pay for the Brazilian investment.

We contacted General Motors to check on the story and spokesman Richard James replied, "I don't know if something got lost in translation but Jaime Ardila, President of GM Brazil did NOT say that funding for GMB projects would come from the US financial aid package. GM Brazil has $1 billion in investments that have already been approved but they will be financed by our Brazilian operations through local sources."

Just as Opel (GM's German division) is going to the German government for assistance, GM Brazil-Mercosur is raising capital in that country. During the congressional hearings this week, CEO Rick Wagoner also indicated that GM operations in different regions are each funding projects locally in response to a question about a recent expansion in Russia. It appears that any money that GM gets from the US government will stay here.

http://www.autoblog.com/2008/11/22/gm-not-sending-any-bailout-money-to-brazilian-operation/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4 t 4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. So that must be from
the first total of 700 Billion now this pisses me off beyond belief they should have to give back everything they received immediately. How in the world is that going to help the good old USA WTF ? The CEO's Of GM should be arrested for false pretense and I don't care how they spin it all of their overseas operation should be shut down now until they get it straight here. Any and all of that supposed bail out money should stay in the us it is tax payer money-right? how dare they, those criminals. My god have they stolen from us. By the way where is Hank he's just gone now he took 700 billion dollars that he said was needed Right Now and now he is just out of it all How lovely for him. Thanks for letting me rant. I am sitting here with no job and no unemployment and I read this and it just kills me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #41
48. for the most part I don't disagree with a thing you posted
I posted this because it was originally in LBN and since the article was over well over 12 hrs old we moved it. Just wanted to give a bit of background. :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
38. HAHAHA! I knew they'd pull this shit with our money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
39. and yet they asked US for handouts..
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
40. what the hell??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4 t 4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. so what can we do about this
Edited on Sat Jan-31-09 05:27 PM by 4 t 4
any ideas ? Shouldn't it be mandatory that they shut down any and all operations outside of the us until they fix their us branches or is it just me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. Please go here and leave your thoughts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
44. Next time around the U.S. taxpayer should wish them the best
and let them sink or swim. Their choice. If they hadn't outsourced so many jobs maybe people would be able to buy their products.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4 t 4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. I really doubt if there will be a next
time. This "bail out" of funds should only be used in the US period-right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
45. Bullshit
There should have been conditions that OUR money be used here in THIS country.
This is bullshit.
The government should have taken the money they gave the banks and the money they gave GM and let US stimulate the economy.

1. House sales would have picked up
2. Car sales would pick up
3. People that couldn't afford to send their kids to college...could
4. Retail sales would have picked up
5. Homeless people could have purchased homes

The car business wouldn't have needed the money because people would be buying, the banks wouldn't need money because people could have paid their bills off and invested, it would have been a win-win for everyone.

Instead--billions of OUR dollars lined fatcat pockets who (just as many thought) would do nothing to help the country or us as individuals. We are right back at square 1--minus several billion dollars!:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
49. Any Democratic Congressmen or Congresswomen reading this thread?
Well, what the fuck are you going to do about it and when in the fuck are you dumb fucks going to learn?

You will always win elections, when you place people above corporations. Rule #1: Corporations will fuck over the American people, whenever they get a chance. The people stood up for you... Now where in the Hell are you when it is time to stand up for the people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
50. Can't make cars people want? Then go cut down more rainforest!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
54. Any criticism of GM's management practices is a dagger in the heart of the UAW.
I don't really believe this but since the usual bullies are mysteriously absent from this thread, I thought I'd be courteous and spread their talking points for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC