Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

All federal legislators and top fed officials should have their taxes audited

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:06 PM
Original message
All federal legislators and top fed officials should have their taxes audited
as a show of good faith.

After hearing about all these tax scandals, I think everyone from both parties should be reviewed to see just how rampant this is in D.C.

I believe such a proposal would be very popular with the public right now. With so many in crisis and struggling to pay their bills and taxes, we need to restore public faith in government by conducting a full audit.

And who knows? Maybe we can come up with a couple million in the process?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. AUTOMATICALLY
GOSH, THE TREASURY WILL GET A BUNDLE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. the IRS should focus on government officials and leave us poor peeps alone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obviously they have...
or at least the ones appointed by Obama. I think it's hilarious that these are considered "tax scandals" considering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It only has come up through the vetting process
I'm talking every federal legislator, A to Z. I'm wondering who the biggest cheats will be, Democrats or Republicans. Or, maybe it's just rich people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I myself would be considered a 'tax-cheat'..
We were audited about 15 years ago, and had to pay back taxes. I guess you can determine guilt by who the IRS chooses to audit, but I don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Did you do it knowingly and hope you wouldn't get caught?
Or just made an honest mistake.

These people have money to pay accountants do their taxes to avoid such mistakes.

It's laughable that Geitner was using TurboTax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I wouldn't know how to do it 'willingly'..
but what difference does it make? Obviously if anyone has a 'tax-problem', they are a 'tax-cheat' right? We've has our taxes done by an accountant ever since..and guess what..he screwed us and filed late one year. So..that means we're really, really 'tax-cheats', right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. When did I call you a tax cheat?
You sure are personalizing this.

No, if you've done due diligence and make a mistake or pay someone who screws up, no, I don't think you are a tax cheat. I think most people are clear that this is not what I am talking about.

BTW, I certainly hope you went after the accountant for any fines or penalties levied against you for it as a result of his negligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. No we didn't...it was just another ordeal...
and when all was said and done, we got all our files and switched accountants. It wasn't so much that he made a mistake, but that he lied about it. But regardless of that why would I be any different than Daschle, or this woman, or Geittner? They are all judged to be "tax-cheats", why wouldn't I be as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. That's not what I said
or likely not what anyone else here thinks.

And, yes, it is VERY different for the reasons I state previously. If someone you paid lies to you and doesn't file your tax documents, how could you logically argue that this is the same as any of these cases?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I can't argue that any cases are the same...
and at the same time I can't argue that mine is any different. What is the same is that I obviously made a mistake..and I got caught in that mistake, and had to pay back taxes. It was years later that my accountant made a mistake...and got caught in it. Looks like we're all human, unlike so many others who claim perfection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Me too! Over 20 years ago, we bought an old VW Beetle that was
mechanically pretty goo, but the body was shot. It was in Pittsburgh, and suffered from a lot of body rot from the salted roads. We bought several cans of body putty, some sand paper, and a gal. of paint and fixed it up. Well, some little vegrant (age 12) from down the street stole it and totaled it by running into a tree. Alll we had was liability ins. on it, so I claimed the loss on my tax return. I carefully clipped the classified from several papers to document how I came up with the value and claimed the loss. We were audited that year, and the IRS said I couldn't claim that amount as actual value beecause I couldn't charge for MY LABOR TIME in fixing it up! Yep, I had to pay $200+ in back taxes. Am I a tax cheat? I don't think so.

HOWEVER, back when people were allowed to deduct a certain amount of the Fed. Tax that was paid on cigaretts, EVERYBODY I knew claimed they smoked! THAT included my old Aunt who wouldn't even let a cigarette inside her house!

Before computerized matching by the IRS, NOT ALL 1099 income was reported.

People who wore mandatory uniforms ALL deducted the cost of having their uniforms dry cleaned/laundered, wether they did them themselves or had them done.

Face it folks, the majority of taxpayers would pay less if they thought they could get away with it!!!!!! I'm disappointed in so many holier than thou's gripeing about Obama's picks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. the worst part of all of this is...
that our tax code is so fucked up, and the real criminals write the frigging laws. People get played so easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Then this is karma - you wrote the laws, you obey them or else this is what you get.
No sympathy from me for them at ALL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. you can't be serious...
the tax laws are written by and for industry. I don't expect you to have any sympathy for anyone who makes a mistake on their tax returns, but I would expect you would know where the major fraud occurs in regards to paying taxes and the IRS itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I expect people to have sympathy, especially for mistakes
Seems to me that's one of the characteristics of a decent person - having sympathy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Do you sympathize with lawbreakers, too?
??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. uh, yeah, considering that I am one
I think I ran 3 or 4 stop signs today while riding my bicycle. Many lawbreakers get caught speeding or failing to wear their seatbelt or smoking a blunt or some other minor infraction. That doesn't make them total a$$holes or mass murderers or cereal rapists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. $125,000 is not jaywalking.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. $125,000 is pretty small potatoes at his income level
There is no proof that he deliberately broke the law, except that the cynics "just know he's guilty". He's declared guilty and even though he paid for this "mistake" without ever being caught, there's no way for him to prove his innocence to a crowd of progressives who already hate him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. If it's small potatoes at his income level, why did he wait to pay such a small amount until Obama
chose him for a cabinet position? Coincidence? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. he says that he thought his accountant was taking care of it
or had taken care of it. That cannot be true though, can it? It must be a deep conspiracy involving bad motives. Simply must be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. something lost it seems...
it's not even the sympathy, it's the empathy. Who are these perfect people who have made no mistakes in life? The willingness to pounce on any human being that doesn't measure up to expectations stuns me. And this is politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. In all fairness, I would be willing to challenge ANYONE who has
filed a tax return more complicated than the norm (like most Americans who are employed by someone else and receive a W2) to go through an audit and come out 100% correct! There's always SOMETHING! Judgements are made that the IRS disagrees. Mistakes are made by accountants. Things are forgotten by the taxpayers.

The lady who was to be the Chief Performance Officer and resigned today was guilty of a very stupid error, but one she certainly KNOWN about. Geitner & Daschel, I honestly believe were stupid oversights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I don't
But I'm sure they are not the only ones in D.C. who are doing it.

If it would have happened to us, how much trouble would we have been for the "mistake"? What fees or penalties are they paying?

The little people get slammed with these. The IRS doesn't say, "Just give us what you owed and we'll call it even."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Even the news media stated that "They paid back taxes PLUS fines & penalties."
The only time anyone gets into REAL trouble with the IRS is when they commit fraud. Laundering $$, claiming more dependants than you actually have. Those offenses are mostly considered fraud, and criminal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Yeah, they both paid AFTER they learned Obama was going to choose them, not before.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ok, but after they audit every mf on Fraud Street first!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. This and the OP are great ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I think you could only tie that to taking taxpayer support
Just going on a fishing expedition into the taxes of a targeted group of private citizens would be unconstitutional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4 t 4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. They should all be audited
they are the law makers if they don't follow them why in the hell should we. Very bad examples they are setting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
28. No shit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC