Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If they had paid the TARP money out to individuals - they would have

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 03:53 PM
Original message
If they had paid the TARP money out to individuals - they would have
saved it or spent it. So there would have been an economic boost from the spenders AND the banks would have gotten recapitalized from the savers.

I'd like my share of the the $350,000,000,000 that's left to be direct deposited please...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, wasn't the amount per American citizen something like $30,000 each?
Should have just given it to the people to spend however they needed to.
Either way, it would have ended up back in the economy anyway.
We'd all been better for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. $3000 each
an email went out claiming 30k, bad math skills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Z_I_Peevey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. If I had an extra $3000 right now, I'd bank about half
and spend half on big-ticket consumer items, like a dishwasher and new cookstove. Just as you said, presto! Capital for my bank and consumer spending.

However, because I am patriotic and I love my country,I'd rather see that $3000 go toward infrastructure.

But if it's between me and the CEOs, I say give the money to the little guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. It would have been spent on personal items, not long term investments in
the American infrastructure, and any more savings to the banks would have come with no-strings-attached.

No thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Not talking about replacement for the Stimulus bill - just talking about
the balance of the TARP - cause we can all see how big a failure it was handing it over to the banks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. That money should have gone to the people-not the banks.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC