Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DU this poll on Michael Phelps

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 10:53 PM
Original message
DU this poll on Michael Phelps
Should Kelloggs have fired Michael Phelps for smoking pot?

It's 52 to 48 Yes right now.


http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2009/02/09/hot-seat-michael-phelps/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Done,
And North Dakota has the highest "no" vote score.

Bizarre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Stupid Floridians voting "Yes"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I know... how stupid...
most of Florida is comprised of pot smokers. :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Bunch a santcimonious
hypocrites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. Thats us!
The same people who still think Jeb Bush was the best thing to happen to Florida since sliced bread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. I wasn't expecting "Yes" to be ahead.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. If he had shoplifted, should he be fired?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I don't consider them morally equivalent. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. It a religious rather than legal issue then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Okay, I'll play
What if Phelps had gotten a parking ticket, which is the legal equivalent of personal possession of pot in many jurisdictions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. In many places it is not & apparently when given an opportunity
to make an argument like that, even Phelps chose not to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hay rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. And what if he stuck a banana in his speedo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. And... ?
Edited on Tue Feb-10-09 11:49 PM by The_Casual_Observer
Is that illegal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Bush did that on the Lincoln....LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NCDem60 Donating Member (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think Kelloggs was correct in dropping Phelps. Here's my reasoning.
Edited on Tue Feb-10-09 11:57 PM by NCDem60
First whether you think it should be legal to smoke MJ or not it isn't. Phelps was not involved in any kind of protest against what he felt was an unjust law. He was just getting a buzz at a party and was dumb enough to do it where a camera was present. While certainly not what I consider a serious offense it is enough of one that Kelloggs is justified in not putting his image on its products promoting him as a hero to children. It was a stupid thing to do and doing stupid things have consequences.

BTW he may have more problems over this. Today there were eight arrests in connection with this party. Not Phelps. Yet. The sheriff there is somewhat of a nut job and he was embarrassed over how this was played in the press. You don't have to live n the south too long to learn it is NEVER a good thing to mess with a southern sheriff. Especially one that last year bought a tank with a 50 caliber machine gun.

http://www.reason.com/blog/show/128482.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I think Kellogg's was right too.
Besides, I'm sure he's not suffering monetarily with his other endorsements. This will teach him a good lesson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Phelps certainly didn't defend what he had done, did he?
However, I doubt he would have offered up any spontaneous confession after that party had he not been caught red handed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. Consider this
Maybe in the case of an obviously unjust law, such as the prohibition of MJ, bystanders could use the Phelps situation to protest the law instead of supporting the actions of Kellogg's and the IOC because "well, it's illegal". It SHOULDN'T be. And don't hand me the "hero to children" crap. If he'd been chugging a brewski, no one would have said boo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NCDem60 Donating Member (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Bad analogy. Chugging a brewski is legal. I find it
Edited on Wed Feb-11-09 12:33 AM by NCDem60
strange that you find the hero to children aspect to be crap. It isn't, and it is a factor in more situations than you think. If Phelps was a teacher and that photo surfaced he would be gone. A factory worker would probably not have a problem. It's just the way it is and until things change those in sensitive positions would do well to remember it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Miscegenation used to be illegal.
Guess if it were 1959 you'd be saying "If Phelps were a teacher and a photo of him dating a black woman surfaced he would be gone. It's just the way it is and until things change those in sensitive positions* would do well to remember it."


*Since when is "swimmer" a sensitive position?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NCDem60 Donating Member (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #21
40. This is not a
racial issue so don't bring up that straw man. You are arguing based on how you want things to be. I am arguing based on how things are. If you are in a public position you have to base your decisions on reality. What is happening to Phelps proves it once again. As I said, it is not a rare occurrence. I support making MJ legal. Until it is there will continue to be various consequences for some who use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 03:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
41. I think so too
he violated his agreement with Kelloggs,it's their right to have a spokesperson that abides by the contract they signed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
20. You are assuming that DU is one giant self-think monolith?
Frankly I consider online polls to be a waste of time and basically of little or no value.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Now that we know what you think of online polls
Why don't you elaborate on your views on pot? Because really, I'd like to know who the authoritarian DUers are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
23. I voted yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Good to know
Like I said to the person just above you, I like knowing who the authoritarians on DU are.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Let's just break all the laws - who the hell cares.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Yeah, because all laws are justified.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Then work to change the ones you don't find
justified. I don't pick and chose which laws to obey. Try to be a law-abiding citizen as much as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Part of that "working to change the ones I don't find justified"
Is voting "no" to someone getting fired for breaking them. I can't imagine being so focused on following and enforcing the rules that I don't examine the rules themselves. I just can't imagine going through life like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. Each to his own. I managed nicely for 70 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. 70 years.
No offense, but that explains it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. What it explains is that I have common sense and respect for others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. What does that have to do with marijuana?
What are your actual views on marijuana? Should it stay illegal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. I have mixed feelings on it. If it's made
legal - won't upset me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 03:27 AM
Response to Reply #36
42. If you had common sense, you wouldn't support such draconian drug laws.
Marijuana prohibition is nothing more than a means of domination over liberals and minorities and a cash cow for right wing authoritarian groups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. Calm down
where did I post I support this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
24. I voted "yes"!
If this had been his first problem, I'd cut him some slack. But he made a phony apology for his DUI, and now he shows up at a party where witnesses say he was ALREADY drunk/doped up before this picture was even taken.

My father was killed by a DUI driver, and Phelps has at least TWICE risked hurting or killing someone else by driving when he's not sober.

He had a chance to straighten up, so fuck him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Do you know he was driving that night?
If he wasn't, then what's the big deal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #26
31. from Guardian Sports
swimmer Michael Phelps, who won six gold medals at the Olympics in Athens, has been charged with driving under the influence by police in Maryland.

Police stopped the 19-year old from Baltimore, after he jumped a red light. He was also in violation of a driver's license restriction.

Phelps has already admitted to, and apologized for the incident. "It was a mistake. Getting into a car with anything to drink is wrong," he said.

"It's dangerous and it's unacceptable. I'm 19, but was taught that no matter how old you are, you take responsibility for actions, which I will do.

"I'm extremely sorry."

According to the Baltimore Sun, if Phelps is convicted of driving while impaired, violation of a licence restriction and failure to obey a stop sign, he could receive a year in jail, a £540 fine and 12 points on his driver's licence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. Was that the same night?
I was under the impression it wasn't. Besides, how is it that the DUI didn't get him fired from Kellogg's but the pot did? Kinda whacked out priorities, if you ask me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. It should have. He talked his way out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #24
35. I am sorry about your father. My
daughter endured many months of physical therapy when a drunk driver ran a light. She and my grandsons are lucky to be alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
43. There's no answer for "Who gives a shit?"
Oh, well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
45. Some multi-millionaire jock
with more brawn than brain lets himself be photgraphed violating a clause in his contract and I should care what Kelloggs does about it :eyes: no thanks. :yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC