Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bills Introduced Yesterday Would Limit Use of 'State Secrets'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:36 PM
Original message
Bills Introduced Yesterday Would Limit Use of 'State Secrets'
Bills Would Limit Use of 'State Secrets'
Obama backs privilege in torture case

by Joseph Williams


WASHINGTON - House and Senate committees yesterday introduced bills that would sharply curtail the government's use of the "state secrets" privilege, a policy used by President Bush to argue that a lawsuit involving allegations of torture should be dismissed - and a position that the Obama administration has now adopted.

Drafted and filed separately by the House and Senate Judiciary committees, the legislation was filed just days after Justice Department lawyers working for the new administration told a federal appeals court that its position did not differ from the Bush administration's: the court should throw out a lawsuit that accuses Jeppesen Inc., of helping the CIA secretly transport five terrorism suspects overseas for harsh interrogations, on the grounds that the suit involved state secrets that, if revealed, could jeopardize national security.

snip//

Nadler said protecting sensitive information "is an important responsibility for any administration and requires that courts protect legitimate state secrets while preventing the premature and sweeping dismissal of entire cases."

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, a Vermont Democrat, said the Senate version of the bill "will help guide the courts to balance the government's interests in secrecy with accountability and the rights of citizens to seek judicial redress" in cases of wrongdoing. The bill, he said, "does not restrict the government's ability to assert the privilege in appropriate cases. In light of the pending cases where this privilege has been invoked, involving issues including torture, rendition and warrantless wiretapping, we can ill afford to delay consideration of this important legislation."

Caroline Frederickson, director of the ACLU's Washington office, said she was "very pleased" by the legislation, which she called an important step to correct a doctrine that has been abused.

more...

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2009/02/12-6
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick for some - any eyes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's the way it should be handled..with
appropriate legislation and not left up to the executive branch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I agree. Who knows? Maybe it will be. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
and eyes :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Add your support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC