Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oklahoma Votes on Taking Gitmo Detainees: Thanks, but No Thanks!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 10:04 AM
Original message
Oklahoma Votes on Taking Gitmo Detainees: Thanks, but No Thanks!
Heard about this last night from a friend in OKC.
These guys really come off sounding like total (GOP) idiots.



Resolution passes to restrict Guantanamo Bay transfers into Oklahoma


House members spent more than an hour Thursday on a nonbinding resolution asking President Barack Obama and Congress to keep terrorist detainees out of Oklahoma.

House Resolution 1008 passed easily, 81-12. Those opposed said they were as patriotic as supporters, but that Oklahoma is prepared to handle the task and it could bring economic security to the state.

The resolution, authored by Reps. T.W. Shannon, R-Lawton, Mike Reynolds, R-Oklahoma City, and Fred Jordan, R-Jenks, requests that Guantanamo Bay detainees not be transferred to any prison in Oklahoma and mentions the Federal Correctional Institution in El Reno, the Fort Sill Regional Confinement Center and the Federal Transfer Center in Oklahoma City. It cites a concern that Oklahoma, by housing terrorist detainees, could become a terrorist target.

"Since when did Oklahomans become a bunch of stinking cowards?” asked Rep. Terry Harrison, D-McAlester. "Let’s bring them to Oklahoma. ... Let’s build a fence around them. ... Let’s charge them with a crime. Let’s try them. If they’re convicted, let’s execute them.”

Support for the resolution
Rep. Rex Duncan, R-Sand Springs, said the resolution is "the most biggest, no-brainer bill” that House members would vote on this session, saying he hoped anyone who voted against the resolution either is term-limited or would be defeated in the 2010 elections.

Rep. Shane Jett, RTecumseh, said keeping the detainees could result in federal funds coming to the state.

Any detainee who would escape wouldn’t get far before some "country boys” and the Oklahoma Highway Patrol would catch them, the lawmaker said.

a bit more:
http://newsok.com/resolution-passes-to-restrict-transfers/article/3345546
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. sick puppies
torture people abroad, don't charge them, hold them indefinitely, but please, keep it out of our backyard.

These people make me ill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. And fear mongers as well
It cites a concern that Oklahoma, by housing terrorist detainees, could become a terrorist target.


I understand that the horror of 1995 Murrah Building bombing still has an effect on many in Oklahoma, but these state legislators are disgusting in their remarks that are now part of the state record.

As a native Oklahoman, am disgusted and embarrassed, but am also not surprised.
Jesus leads the way on every street corner there.
And then those political "leaders" go out of their way to amp up racism and hatred.
...and they're proud of it. :puke:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC