Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GODDAMN FUCKING CANCER. Know how much cancer research/treatment Iraq MISTAKE would have bought?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:14 PM
Original message
GODDAMN FUCKING CANCER. Know how much cancer research/treatment Iraq MISTAKE would have bought?
Edited on Tue Mar-27-07 02:35 PM by Proud2BAmurkin
I think I read the money spent on the Iraq DISASTER would have paid for 40 years of cancer research.

FUCK THOSE FILTHY REPUKE SCUMBAGS.

40 years of research and millions of deaths so coward deserter PISSYPANTS could pretend he was "fighting" a war.

If Democrats would make this point they would have no problem selling a pullout deadline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Or alternative energy R&D?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. yep millions more lives nt
But what about Pissypants codpiece?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. How much would it have bought?
All of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. it would certainly have paid for Universal Healthcare
Which would allow many more people to get regularly checkups and allow folks to catch cancer much earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Yep how many prostate exams/mammagrams will 500 billion buy?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. And colonoscopys...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. Or, even better than diagnosis,
prevention?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. That would be the best investment, I think.

Not that I don't want cures found for cancer and all the other diseases that ruin people's lives and kill them. Just that universal health care would mean earlier detection and treatment for more people.

More money for health education would also help -- PSAs on radio and tv, shown at movie theaters, in newspapers and magazines, etc.

It's a mistake to think that more money given to research will guarantee a cure. Cancer research is well-funded already. There are "orphan" diseases that affect many people and get very little of the research money pie.

I do care about cancer, lost my mother and one friend to it so far. My mother would have lived longer had her doctor listened to her when she told him her cough had changed. She had emphysema so he just blew her off for four months, kept telling her to lose weight and her emphysema would get better. She went in every month for four months, trying to convince him something different was wrong. FInally he did a chest X-ray and saw the inoperable cancer.

More money for research isn't going to do anything about idiot doctors who don't listen to their patients.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ah, the real cost of the war.
Edited on Tue Mar-27-07 02:18 PM by Deep13
The death and destruction is easy to see. The lost opportunities are less obvious. It is not only the real cost for the war, but a big part of the real reason for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Add a little stem cell research into the mix nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. sure. We could have afforded a few decades of that too
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's a long, long list.
The printing costs of the list alone would be significant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. $411,000,000,000+ could have gotten use a lot farther to a cure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. And as someone mentioned upthread enough prevention for millions not to need one
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yup, all that money we spent on Iraq could go towards:
Finding a cure for cancer, AIDS, and several major diseases and disorders.

It could have gone toward finding an alternative energy source.

It could have gone toward providing health care for EVERY American citizen.

Instead, it goes to the senseless killing of Iraqi citizens who had NOTHING to do with the events of September 11th, 2001. NOTHING.

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. Bush wants to cut the funding for the National Cancer Institute for second year in a row —
this time by $40 million.

From article:

"We are pulling the rug out from the world's best infrastructure for cancer research and for all biomedical research. It doesn't make any sense to me," says Dr. Shelton Earp of UNC's Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Funding for the National Cancer Institute had been going up steadily for a decade, but now President Bush wants to cut the funding for the second year in a row — this time by $40 million.

The newest cancer research may be especially threatened by these cuts. Money has always been tight. Even back in 2002, when the budget was growing, the government approved only one in five promising proposals for new research. Now only one in 10 is funded.

It's not only the research, but the researchers themselves that are affected. Some worry these cuts will have chilling effect on recruiting up-and-coming scientists.


http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/25/eveningnews/main2400032.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crim son Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
15. It makes me furious.
Cancer research, food or medicine for the poor, repairing our country's infrastructure... this is where the money was needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. this sick regime just does not care, and with that sick ideology
they have show how immoral they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crim son Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. May I tell you something that has me so pissed off right now?
I woke on Saturday morning to hear my husband having a huge fight with his mother (by phone) over her tireless and sickening support for the shrub. The man can do no wrong and it doesn't matter what evidence you put in front of her face, she disregards it. Why? Because she votes around one issue: abortion. Putting aside the argument that the shrub has accomplished very little in terms of limiting/denying women the right to choose, isn't it freaking illogical to vote to save lives, in theory, and in so voting ensuring the deaths of perhaps hundreds of thousands, and potentially denying hope to millions more? It BOGGLES my mind. Needless to say, the woman thinks she has God on her side. It makes me ill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cabcere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. People like that really irritate me
and I will never, ever understand why they care more about fetuses than they do about those who are already alive. :grr: :shrug: Why does right-to-life end at birth for these people? I just don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. It just makes me sick to think of all the good, positive things that money
could have been spent on instead of Bush's Optional Iraq War.

I hope George Bush pays dearly for his lies and greed. He needs to serve out the rest of his years incarcerated!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. I'm still waiting for some Democratic candidate to MAKE THIS POINT
Then they would have no trouble passing a pullout deadline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #16
30. in todays threads it mentions how the Pope believes in Hell
well, that is where W is going full time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
momto3 Donating Member (497 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
19. I totally agree
This is my first post to DU even though I have lurked for a long time. PA Democrat is absolutely correct. As a young cancer scientist, the future opportunities for me are bleak. The NIH budget was slashed 20% last year across the board. This cut applies to all funded NIH research - not just cancer research. The only way to get grants funded is to do what has already been done. New ideas won't get funded, simply because money is so tight that new ideas are too "risky". I have recently been giving serious thought to becoming an industry scientist. I have always been drawn to academia - the haven of new ideas and the freedom to follow my own lead. But, since funding is so bad, I have considered selling out. I have a family to feed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Welcome!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Welcome to the fight
phDmom, I'm glad you decided to chime in :hi: We could have done so much with the dollars we threw away for lil boots* ego.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Welcome to DU, PhDmom!
The Bush administration seems to dislike scientists (or at the least the ones who have principles) in general, don't they? How sad that we are going to lose some of the best minds available to solve the world's biggest problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. Hi!
Welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
31. Hi PhDmom!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
25. healing and comforting rather than killing and destroying- no shock, genuine
awe.

We will never 'beat' death- it's a necessary part of life. But the opportunity to fully live the days we're given, the ability to ease pain and lessen suffering, using our technology and energy to control disease - actions which are life GIVINGwould be a positive not only for the USA, but the whole world.

You can tell a lot about a society by looking at the things they spend their time, money, and energy on. Some rather sad stuff being written about this generation of our nation-

It's time to turn it all around, while we can, if we can-

peace,
blu
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
29. A piddly $4billion would "solve" homelessness
according to the National Coalition For The Homeless.

What a bargain!!

Do you have any idea of the health problems of homeless people?

Yet, I'm willing to bet nobody will even read this, let alone reply.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. bobbolink, it's shameful
How much money? How much debt? How many lives? All for a pack of lies.

We could have solved homelessness and provided healthcare.

It's a disgrace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. Yet, it doesn't matter. How many here give a rip?
As Sapphire Blue said, there's maybe about 50 of you, and I think that's a generous estimate.

For the rest of the DUers, I and other poor folk can die and it won't matter one iota.

I'm sick to death.

Literally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
32. treatments for cancer, AIDS, and malaria -- not to mention clean water worldwide
... would sure generate more international goodwill than Bush has done so far. I suspect that terrorists would have a much harder time convincing people to turn against a country that has saved the lives of their children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
34. This was brought up among friends today....money can always be found for wars....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
35. You know how much we're paying
in just interest on the foreign debt, thanks to that cropsucker's borrowing? Three quarters of a billion dollars a day !

Heard it on C-Span last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC