Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EARMARKS - modest suggestions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 08:26 AM
Original message
EARMARKS - modest suggestions
yesterday, a co-worker blathered on about "earmarks" and "pork" - you could have run an audio of limbaugh side-by-side with him and wouldn't notice a difference.

so I asked him - if the Republicans were soooo upset by earmarks, why haven't they withdrawn their own earmarks from the budget? Of course the co-worker had no answer and went into ditto-heading another limbaugh blather.

This got me to thinking - how to address the issue of earmarks.

Some suggestions:

1. no earmarks are allowed to be added to a bill which are not related directly related to the bill. Example: An infrastructure bill to repair bridges can't have an earmark in it for promoting free-range chickens.

2. OPEN and TRANSPARENT disclosure of who requested the earmark. There are several sites which track earmarks but it takes some digging to find out who requested what. there's an OMB page dealing with earmarks, but it doesn't specifically list who requested the earmark. If a congress critter wants $X for an earmark - their name should be on it and we should be able to know who they are.

3. If a congress-critter objects to $x for a particular earmark, they should be willing to withdraw an equal $x for their earmark. (Double or nothing rule.) If repubs objects to $50k to study med-fly mating rituals, the repubs would with draw $50k worth of their own earmarks - same would apply to Dems.

4. No earmarks in budget, supplementals, or any other bill. Earmarks would be handled by it's own separate bill, complete with a listing of who asked for what and how much.

---------Remember if you hear someone on TV/Radio mentioning any/all of these - you saw it here first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's kind of related to my longterm desire to
have politicians, ALL politicians, wear a uniform similar to the ones worn by NASCAR racers, with all the sponsors on it. Any company who contributes large amounts of money to a politician gets free advertisement on the politician.

I think that one thing alone would do wonders for fixing our corrupt system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I have this image of
a few critters having to have signs that say "see other suit for more sponsers"

and others with chalk marked spots saying "this space available"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC