Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Have you seen next week's cover of Newsweek?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 02:03 PM
Original message
Have you seen next week's cover of Newsweek?
"ENOUGH"



http://www.newsweek.com/id/188335

From the article:

""It's the tonalities, it's the anger," says Sam Tanenhaus, the Whittaker Chambers and William F. Buckley Jr. biographer who is writing a book about conservatism's intellectual collapse. "Rush and CPAC want to work themselves up, but the great middle of the country is not going to listen to them."

Complete with an angry freeper in the comments section barking about the injustice of using a "Newsweek pole" to prove the point.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wouldn't touch that with a ten foot poll. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's too bad magazine cover paper is too stiff and nonabsorbent to be used as TP.
Newsweek could sell a lot more magazines if their cover page for this issue were printed on Charmin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sammythecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Perfect!
I hope what we're witnessing now turns out to be the "death throes" of the radical right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. All those conservative icons from the past 20 years
are old and establishment. They won it all and have nothing left to fight for, with only progress to fight against.

There is nothing more damning to any movement than having it's leaders get old and unattractive and its dogma pushed as something written in stone and passed down through the ages. It's old, worn out, ossified, and ready to be overturned by young people chafing against its certainty.

They've lost any semblance of moral outrage because the liberals have been out of power since 1969. Every problem in this country is now due to 40 years of their rule in both parties.

They were left in 2008 with a querulous old man spouting "change" but completely unable to define what shape it might take beyond "secret plans" to remake the economy and win all the wars.

Much has been made of Limbaugh's profusely sweaty performance at the CPAC convention. It was perfectly normal to those of us who grew up in showbiz. It was flop sweat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. God, I forgot about the "secret plans" schtick. Pathetic. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. And posthumous Reagan fellatio isn't going to cut the mustard, either
All the bright, enthusiastic and oh-so-energized Young Republicans who were the "Reagan Revolution" footsoldiers are pushing 50, and the parents and grandparents and uncles and aunts who looked on approvingly as they got into politics are gone, for the most part, to their rewards.

Rush et. al. are conveniently forgetting something about the nature of time - Reagan means less and less with every election cycle, and shouting his name louder isn't going to change that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. ~snicker~
It breaks my heart to see them all fighting like this. Poor right wing. All discombobulated and desperate. What a shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. the great thing about this is that Rush is loyal to Rush, not the party
So he's not going to quiet down even if he were somehow made to understand that it would be best for conservatism if he faded into the background. He's loving this and so are we--a win-win!

The whole article, including the parts that aren't about Rush as much as they're about the shift in the electorate, is great news--thanks for the link!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The pic in your sig line says it all. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. 'Newsweek pole" lol. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. Frum is onto what's happening!
http://www.newsweek.com/id/188279

On the one side, the president of the United States: soft-spoken and conciliatory, never angry, always invoking the recession and its victims. This president invokes the language of "responsibility," and in his own life seems to epitomize that ideal: He is physically honed and disciplined, his worst vice an occasional cigarette. He is at the same time an apparently devoted husband and father. Unsurprisingly, women voters trust and admire him.

And for the leader of the Republicans? A man who is aggressive and bombastic, cutting and sarcastic, who dismisses the concerned citizens in network news focus groups as "losers." With his private plane and his cigars, his history of drug dependency and his personal bulk, not to mention his tangled marital history, Rush is a walking stereotype of self-indulgence—exactly the image that Barack Obama most wants to affix to our philosophy and our party. And we're cooperating! Those images of crowds of CPACers cheering Rush's every rancorous word—we'll be seeing them rebroadcast for a long time.


I love it. All the White House had to do was a few simple statements here and there and this civil war among the Republicans took off.

And the best part of it is, the Republicans that eshew the Limbaugh wing of the party have to cooperate with him in making policy. He's got the carrot and he's letting Rush Limbaugh be the personification of the stick. Brilliant politics!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. Very interesting read from Frum
There's going to be a bloodbath in the Rushican civil war. :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. Obama never angry? Don't make the mistake of believing that.
BHO is quite capable of getting angry. He just doesn't let it cloud his judgement, much less lose control. The Repugs don't understand genuine outrage, only the showboating, manufactured form. And that gives the long-term advantage to BHO and the Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. Somebody will lambast him because he writes "DemocratIC Party."
If they haven't already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. I FUCKING HATE THESE PEOPLE.
Edited on Sun Mar-08-09 03:07 PM by WilliamPitt
From the article:

===

I'm a conservative Republican, have been all my adult life. I volunteered for the Reagan campaign in 1980. I've attended every Republican convention since 1988. I was president of the Federalist Society chapter at my law school, worked on the editorial page of The Wall Street Journal and wrote speeches for President Bush—not the "Read My Lips" Bush, the "Axis of Evil" Bush. I served on the Giuliani campaign in 2008 and voted for John McCain in November. I supported the Iraq War and (although I feel kind of silly about it in retrospect) the impeachment of Bill Clinton. I could go on, but you get the idea.

===

OK.

You supported the Iraq war...but feel silly about impeaching a sitting president for lying to his wife about an affair.

Thank God you don't feel silly about supporting the war and stuff. That would probably suck.

P.S. That silly impeachment was what got you your Iraq war. The impeachment killed Gore's chances in 2000 (hmmm...could that be why they did it?) and paved the way for George and the Boys...but yeah, you were there, writing speeches and stuff, so yoiu know all this.

Silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. And THAT guy is in the process of being hounded with shrieks of "RINO."
He's right about one thing:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. who is worse? Frum or Rush????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. Crap and Poop
Toss-up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. Not for nothing, Rush is one butt-ugly being. He looks like an incarnated wild boar. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
17. OH man. They ought to be shipped in brown paper with a warning
That's one scary sight!

(And "Newsweek pole" LOL! Why are so many of those people complete illiterates?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemical Bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
19. But they put him on the cover, didn't they?
And they give the "liberal media" lies more apparent backing.

Bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
20. It is inspirational.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC