Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bushco disproves the Peter Principle. (Another fine Jackpine rant)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 10:36 AM
Original message
Bushco disproves the Peter Principle. (Another fine Jackpine rant)
According to the Peter Principle as expounded by Laurence Peter, people rise in bureaucracies (public or private) until they hit their level of incompetence, at which point they cease to rise, so over time the higher rungs tend to become filled with incompetent people.

In the Bush administration, however, people tend to overshoot their levels of competence by several orders of magnitude. Take Shrub himself, for example. If he had ceased his upward trajectory when he hit his level of incompetence, he'd still be a drunken cheerleader at Yale. However, the rules are different for members of the privileged classes, just as they were in the British military of 3 centuries ago, where the higher ranks were filled with the moronic, inbred younger sons of the aristocracy.

Bush rose in the world for the same reason British Navy officers did in the 17th and 18th centuries: because of connections to the aristocracy. Bush was useful to the rangers not because of any personal competence, but because they could leverage his name in the process of eminent-domain takings of land on which to build their stadium. He was likewise useful to the oil industry because his presence guaranteed that countries like Dubai, who sought favor with his father, would shower all sorts of special concessions on any company that employed him in a figurehead role.

According to my analysis, Karl Rove's role in all this was to manage Bush's public image so as to maintain him as a viable figurehead. He does this by manipulating the complicit mass media with the same bag of dirty tricks that his mentor, Lee Atwater, developed and used for Reagan and Bush 1. The media are willing distributors for Rove's venomous messages. Rove succeeds with his brazen lies and distortions because the blaring and thoroughly corrupt media permit him to saturate the public consciousness with them, permitting no meaningful expression of any alternative messages. Thus even today, when all sorts of revelations are coming forward about the US Attorney scandal, the Plame affair, the coverup of global warming data, etc., the public is not yet in the streets with pitchforks.

It is not possible to keep up the Big Lie method forever in politics. The Russians knew they were being lied to, and developed afinely tuned ability to read between the lines of Pravda and Trud. They observed changes in the political winds by studying pictures of the big shots on the reviewing platform at the May Day parades to see who was standing nearest to whom. They smuggled messages and ran off samizdat publications on illicit mimeograph machines. They knew.

The Russians never had the Internet, never had a DU. We do, despite budding attempts to control it. We have a few publications like the Nation and the Progressive, and once in a while the bigger newspapers have a fleeting attack of conscience that flashes across the editorial page. And of course there are CSPAN and FSTV. There are Air America and Amy Goodman. One way or another, the truth gets around.

At this point the majority of people oppose the war. They want single-payer health care. B a huge majority they want the Congressional investigations to go on. By these and other signs a new truth is coming to light, and it is this:

Rove, too, has overshot his level of competence. And it will cost him his head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. So has Rice long time ago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. I read that book over 20 years ago
Interesting principles and oooohhhh so true. Highly recommend it all on the DU...

I may just have to locate a copy and re-read it....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yeah. I read it back then too. I was reminded of it on another thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yes indeed.....
this IS another fine Jackpine rant! :)

Thing is....pretty sure that * is only the tip of the incompetency iceberg.

:hi::loveya::hug:
DR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Hello, DR.
Thank you :blush:

and :hi: :loveya: :hug: back at ya.

How's things in the desert?

Hey, it just dawned on me--I don't think I've seen ZombyWoof around here in ages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaksavage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. Bush is the poster boy
for privilage trumps intelligence

And those around him are like the specialty
bees that tend the queens needs
living off of the power she yields

only this group is malicious

IMPEACH!!!!!!!!!!
all of them

thx JP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyOrangeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
8. Their arrogance and inability to see beyond their own self-
interests did most of them in. I agree bush** was always an intellectual lightweight. The others weren't. They were/are just greedy and corrupt.

And as Dr. Lawrence T. Peter said, their have advanced to their own particular level of incompetence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC