Bush: Dem meddling could harm troops - But Bush sending thousands of them to their deaths doesn't?

NNN0LHI

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Mar-28-07 12:41 PM
Original message

Bush: Dem meddling could harm troops - But Bush sending thousands of them to their deaths doesn't?

http://www.leadingthecharge.com/ViewArticle.aspx?id=9893&source=2

Bush: Dem meddling could harm troops
2007/3

By ANNE FLAHERTY, Associated Press Writer 9 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - President Bush accused congressional Democrats Wednesday of meddling in Iraq war policy and said setting a deadline for a pull-out of U.S. forces would have disastrous repercussions for both Iraq and America.

"We would hope th, , ) said after the Senate voted to uphold a timeline proposal in a war spending bill.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

BOSSHOG

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Mar-28-07 12:44 PM
Response to Original message

1. Conservatives support our troops

by keeping them in harm's way forever for no apparent reason.

Dems meddling could save thousands of lives but bush backers don't give a fuck about the troops because they would have to admit they have been wrong all along.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

wicket

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Mar-28-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #1

8. The right-wingers support the troops when they come back in bodybags

:grr: :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

wuushew

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Mar-28-07 12:52 PM
Response to Original message

2. Does the President use a veto stamp?

If he misspells veto, does a bill still become law? I seem to recall Bush famously signed the wrong version of a bill and it still went into effect so I am not hopeful.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

bdamomma

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Mar-28-07 01:00 PM
Response to Original message

3. mr bush needs a lesson that there are 3 co equal branches

of government, gee, he hates, checks and balances and oversight, too bad George!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

sinkingfeeling

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Mar-28-07 01:06 PM
Response to Original message

4. Nor, I guess, does his destroying the National Guard and taking 1/3 of their equipment

to Iraq. Most military officers say the military can only go on another year without irreversible damage.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

NNN0LHI

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Mar-28-07 01:23 PM
Response to Original message

5. Funny how are media is unable to make this connection?

Well not really funny.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

bdamomma

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Mar-28-07 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #5

7. we are so vulnerable as a nation right now, can we hold them

(this administration) as a threat to our national security, with a serious decrease of National Guardsmen to protect our states.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

bdamomma

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Mar-28-07 01:26 PM
Response to Original message

6. I'm going to avoid hearing this stupid man tonite say this on the

news, I probably throw something at the TV.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

whistle

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Mar-28-07 02:01 PM
Response to Original message

9. There really is no limit to stupidity and Shrub* proves that again and again

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Wed May 01st 2024, 03:32 PM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.