Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

One of Specter's first phone calls re EFCA was to Grover Norquist.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 06:11 PM
Original message
One of Specter's first phone calls re EFCA was to Grover Norquist.
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/03/24/specter-no-efca/

Today on the Senate floor, Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) announced his intention to vote against cloture on the Employee Free Choice Act. Specter was the only Republican to vote for cloture when the measure was last considered in 2007. During his announcement, Specter noted his previous support for EFCA, but suggested that the current condition of the economy makes “this a particularly bad time to enact employee’s choice legislation”:

SPECTER: The problem of the recession make this a particularly bad time to enact employees choice legislation. … I am announcing my decision now because I have consulted with a very large number of interested parties on both sides and I have made up my mind. Knowing that I will not support cloture on this bill, Senators may choose to move on and amend the , as I have suggested, or otherwise.

(snip)

As evidence of the right-wing pressure he was facing, one of Specter’s first calls was to Grover Norquist, the head of Americans for Tax Reform, to inform him of his decision. Further, as Sam Stein notes, Specter is “likely to face a major primary challenge from Club For Growth president Pat Toomey in the 2010 election, which may have factored into this apparent decision.”

(snip)

Responding to Specter's announcement, Norquist told the Washington Times, "This is huge. This ends card check for the year. Now we have to make sure the Democrats don't pick up two or three Senate seats."

(end snip)

This is HUGH!!!11!? In your own bathtub, maybe, Grover.

Was another of his phone calls to Rushbo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. So Specter won't get primaried.
Still has to win the vote against a Democrat.

The guy is a snake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah, that's what I figured it to be.
Moving right to head off a Repug challenger, then mishmushing leftward for the General.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. And he'll have more money in his war chest to campaign against
the Democratic challenger if he doesn't have to fight a war of attrition in a primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. "Primaried" is a verb now? A threat!?
Fascinating.

(Nothing against you, it just seems to me the GOP have made everything a threat.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I think it has more to do with a trend towards verbifying than a trend towards threatifying.
Edited on Tue Mar-24-09 06:33 PM by DireStrike
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Very cromulent argument. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Cromulent, perhaps, but hardly prenugent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 03:05 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Prenugence is not necessary when one is homo-chronulously truthy ...
Edited on Wed Mar-25-09 03:07 AM by ColbertWatcher
... and Dubyanificent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Yep. That's how they whack the moderates back into line.
They threaten them with a primary, making them spend more money than they would unopposed, and also makes the candidate weaker in the general after getting beat up by one of his own.

They'll do it to Bunning in Kentucky as he is seen as a liability now. He'll get primaried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. So, the GOP has successfully made the campaigns 24/7. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Lots of stick.
Not much carrot for the useful idiots of the Predator Class like Specter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Did I do okay, Mr Norquist? Am I still in the club now?"
Not hard to visualize this slimy mf'er groveling to the lunatic fringe of the party in an effort to keep his seat. It'd be ironic and easy to predict that they'd run somebody against him anyhow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 03:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. That would explain Specter's sudden expertise in what is "socialist". n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes, and then he sent out this bullshit email to people who contacted him to support the EFCA
Dear Pennsylvania Constituent,



After giving exhaustive consideration to the Employee Free Choice legislation, I have decided to oppose the bill for reasons specified in my Senate floor statement which is contained below or you may read here and watch here.

http://specter.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=NewsRoom.NewsReleases&ContentRecord_id=39dce122-fce9-5df9-bc36-a3d7dc60fa54

I remain open to working to correct the imbalance which exists with so many jobs being exported and substantial labor losses in areas like pensions and health care.



In my floor statement, I have also laid out some suggested revisions to the National Labor Relations Act which could provide the basis for correcting the current imbalance.



Sincerely,



Arlen Specter




So workers, Arlen feels your pain, but chooses to screw you anyway.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. Does this really end EFCA for the year?
Why do republicans get to pass bills when they have 50 votes, but Democrats need 60?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
14. Specter is going down
The unions will be gunning for him and he's never had that problem in PA.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC