Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LAT: 'If There Was Criminal Wrongdoing (By Bushco)-THERE SHOULD BE PROSECUTIONS'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:05 AM
Original message
LAT: 'If There Was Criminal Wrongdoing (By Bushco)-THERE SHOULD BE PROSECUTIONS'
Editorial
Judging the war on terror
The U.S., and now other countries, are conducting legal inquiries into Bush-era policies.
April 4, 2009

The Obama administration has deleted the term "global war on terror" from the government lexicon but is finding it more difficult to wipe the slate on some of the dark activities that rhetoric was used to justify. Since his election, President Obama has said he would prefer to look forward instead of backward at charges that the Bush administration used illegal detention and torture to prosecute its campaign against terrorism. That's an understandable political impulse, but it may prove difficult to sustain.

A Spanish court has opened criminal proceedings against six senior Bush administration officials accused of providing the legal framework to allow the torture of prisoners at the Guantanamo Bay detention center ...

The Spanish case comes on the heels of a British investigation into whether an MI5 security official colluded with American agents to torture Binyam Mohamed, a British resident held at Guantanamo. The two cases reflect a growing international determination to find out whether the Bush administration abandoned the rule of law in pursuit of terrorists. We too want to know. ...

The Obama administration must restore the international community's confidence in the U.S. rule of law, as well as our own. That means that investigations into possible criminal wrongdoing in the terror war should proceed with all due care and vigor. Once the probes are completed, the findings should be made public, whenever possible. And, as Obama has said, if there was criminal wrongdoing, there should be prosecutions.

more at:
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-torture4-2009apr04,0,3397737.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ain't gonna happen.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not in this country anyway.
Other countries, just give them time. It is early yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. True, though it's unclear to me how that would be done,
given jurisdiction issues and sovereign immunity.

Wasn't Kissinger convicted in some parts of Europe, and if so, how was that done? I guess what I'm asking is, is there a precedent for this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antiwarmonger Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Should never give up hope of prosecutions
And hopefully, there are those who will never stop tryng to prosecute.

First sign of hope is in Spain. Several indictments were brought against Bush cronies for torture/war crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. If we don't do it, someone else almost surely will
Right now, the nation of Francisco Franco seems to be taking the lead in prosecuting crimes against humanity committed by the United States government. Thankfully, at this time, they're following rules of criminal procedure and developing evidence. Other groups of people might not be quite so circumspect about the rules of law, and decide to exact punishment in a more ad hoc manner. But I'm sure that nobody here or anywhere in the United States could possibly get too upset about having to pay with their lives for the crimes of the Bush administration, right?

Those are our options, folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC