Stalking the Shadows: Does DU need its own "Boogeyman"?

Why have we gotten so mean here?

Some days I barely recognize my beloved DU, and I take partial blame as many of us should. I can't believe I would almost long for the days of George W Bush when we seemed to be united against our common foe and enemy of true freedom everywhere despite his bullshit to the contrary.

Sure the Primaries were brutal around here and I’m told I was lucky to have joined after the 2004 election. I know I’m still nursing bruises from this one.

So we won. Yay team! Hoo fucking rah!!! Do we go back to sleep or even worse turn the guns on each other? I’m ashamed to say I’ve engaged in a bit of both. I’m almost comfortably apathetic now, perhaps more relieved, and have tried to be patient, but then like an idiot I log in and start reading my favorite forum again and all I see is red.

The internets are bloody with our infamous Democratic “Circular firing squad” and the guns are well cleaned, oiled and their users still riding adrenaline from the kill.

I fully realize this is a private forum designed to support our Democratic representatives, but I can’t believe that Skinner et al. really want to suppress any reasonable criticism of our new President’s directions and there is no evidence they are engaged in that. There has been a rash of tombstonings even since the primes but those were, in my experience, justly executed trolls, of which there seems to be an infestation of lately.

No, as usual, the majority of the bloodletting has been from our distinguished members, some who seemed the best of allies in “The Bush Years”. We’ve always been combative with each other, normally in constructive ways, but lately there just seems to be a darker cloud here. We’re at each others throats. Very vile and hurtful and, to use a cliché, “Un-PC”, comments and insults are being hurled at each other with alarming regularity. Is it just me seeing this?

Maybe it’s the “hippie at heart” in me but, peace, guys and gals. Can we put the flowers in the barrels of our rifles for awhile and agree to disagree on how our new President is doing without becoming generic internet assholes to each other?

Please help me to stop having to wish that we had our own “Al Qaeda” AKA George W Bush back to unite our community and once again make this forum a place for friends, activism for our Constitutional ideals, intriguing discussion and even love. Because, as anonymous as a forum might be for some of us it is a kind of family that has loved and supported some of us in ways we can never repay; and that’s what family does, or is supposed to do anyway.

Yeah, families fight too, but no one likes it when they do.
Peace
-S

I have no problem with people of no religion, they most certainly are entitled to their beliefs or non-beliefs. However, these are pretty high holy days, especially today for both Christians and Jews. I'd appreciate it if the non-believers could dial it back a little on their comments. That's pretty much it. Let the snark and flames begin, I'm checking into the Masters tourney and let the rest of the world go by.

<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPAbAmR_S_4>

I see left-wing infighting as a process. There are glaring inconsistancies within the left. They are starting to surface. As in workers rights vs DLC/Wall Street issues. I see a big fight coming over immigration. It's inconsistant to be for workers rights then throw those same workers under the bus for slave illegal immigrant labor. What will the Unions do? I know my head exploded yesterday when the media starting hinting that Obama was going to nationalize 12 million illegals. During all this job loss. WTF? I hope this is just a rumor because it's a really stupid idea. It would also put him back in question for being anti-left when it comes to MONEY! The Goldman Sachs/TARP/TALF/Geithner/Summers problem we don't need more of that right now. Labor crossing borders is Adam Smith part two. Just like "free-trade agreements. It's ALL Adam Smith. I never understand why certain people on the left don't get that.

The other fight could be gay marriage and the re-awakening of the Christian right. I'm not as worried about this as I used to be. The Christians voted to give Wall Street more power for the last 30 years. It kinda blows their image. "Jesus loves the money changers". They can't explain that away so they're going to try to change the subject back to the wedge issues. I don't think it will work this time. All we need are signs saying "Pro-life or Pro-Wall Street". The gig is up and they been exposed for the heretics they are. I think the game is over but we'll see. If they try it I'm ready. I'd like nothing better than to put the Christian right down for good. They're the fascist foot-soldiers and without them the GOP is nothing. Bring it on.

No justice, no peace.

Really, I don't know what I have in common with some of Obama's zombie horde of blinkered supporters anymore. There is no Democratic principle that they respect more than the personality at the center of their cult.

With the daily outrages from Obama mounting nearly as fast as they did under bush, it's hard to know what subjects would be possible in such a "peaceful forum."

:shrug:

Best party stories (as far as we can remember), music, art, writing. Oh yeah, we already have all those and they get 10 posts a day, maybe. Fuck it, maybe its just the human condition in it's rawest form. Anonymity can cause a "Lord of the Flies" type effect IMO.

But what you said right now is exactly the point that is being made in this post. I still like Obama and yet somehow that makes me a sheeple and a coward. I know you probably won't care what I have to say but I'm just saying. Don't be so outraged when people don't turn against Obama at the drop of a dime. They aren't your sheeple either.

is a BIG part of the problem.

Or are there just outrage manufacturers with many willing buyers? It always seems to me that the outrage brigade finds 5% that is wrong and that is so terribly awfully wrong that it ruins everything.

I reserve my outrage for a few important, basic things:

+ constitutionally guaranteed rights and civil liberties

+ war crimes and crimes against humanity

+ worker's rights and an economy and national infrastructure that allow my children to live well

+ planetary damage that won't recover from our rapacious ways



So far, I can't say he's doing so hot on the first three.

Yes- people have been ripping each other to shreds for the past year.

Lots of nerves are so raw it doesn't take much to get tempers flaring these days......myself included.

B-)

hehehe ~smootch~

has to be a good omen right? Wearing it now. Also blessed the house with some sage and a candle and sealed the doors from negativity.

Sorry if I'm scaring the straights. Witches talking here.

I bet things are going to turn around for you!

I also suggest leaving it out under the light from the full moon tonight to re-consecrate :)

~big hugs~

:shrug:

I don't see it.

but then I don't go to the "dungeons."

Just my opinion though

We have had the good fortune of having our candidate become that leader.

a) now what? In many ways the policy distinctions between the old boss and the new one (particularly in the economy, executive overreaching, civil rights, health care and the war) are too subtle for my tastes.
b) I don't speak cheerleader.
c) Those who are nursing bruises from the primary are the survivors. The operating primary rules were described in the Lord of the Flies. We lost dozens of good contributors, ostracized by the majority.

To some degree "the combat" is healthy. One of my problems with DU has always been doctrine. I have no desire to be tombstoned, but I'm here because the guiding principles of DU are consistent with my world view, not the reverse; I don't hold the opinions I do because the rules dictate it. I'm perfectly happy debating issues with those who (given the same facts) see the world differently. In fact, I think that's pretty much the whole point.

The left needs to put as much pressure on Obama as the right does. Granted, that pressure should take a different form, but we cannot simply shut up and hope for the best.

Glen Beck will bring us together!

had plenty of mean-ness at times here. And it hasn't always been reserved for 'the others'.
but I agree with you-
If we can't disagree without being assholes, then we are just another part of what is wrong.

I appreciate the way you've said this. And I hope we can all learn to treat each other better.
It has to start with each of us individually.

:grouphug:

i'm weary of all the anger- justified or not.

blu

Karl Rove just snarled at Vice President Biden, openly and without shame. Dick Cheney is out of office, but supposedly gives advice and consent to a murder squad in the government. Glenn Beck is producing rants that make Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh look like rational citizens by comparison. The less crazy Republican Lie Machine keeps cranking out nonsense.

There is no reason to wish for Bush to come back. His buddies are here in force. Actually, Bush was little more than a drunken puppet. The real people of his administration are still cranking along. And the people BEHIND the people haven't been thrown out of their corporate offices.

There are still real enemies out there, although many people on DU seem to be unaware of them.

Nance Greggs wrote a really good op a couple months ago praising DU for the lively debate necessary for a healthy democracy and recognized the coalescing of the community into sides on different issues. I tried to find it but couldn't.

would be helpful. For some time the attitude of a great many well-intentioned people here has been, "I'm right and you're a troll/a fascist/a racist/a homophobe if you disagree with even 1% of what I'm saying."

Big Tent, people...remember?

Hug for the OP! :grouphug:

And this one is no exception...

My only quibble is with your use of the word "well intentioned." I don't think that many of the folks throwing around some of the adjectives you mentioned have anything even close to resembling good intentions.

And I do agree, some such people are not well-intentioned; just trying to give the benefit of the doubt. Most are, I believe, committed liberals, but they tend to see things in black and white on some issues.

It really grinds my gears to see DUers treating each other like freepers, and that goes for both sides of the Obama-divide.

But you know, if you participated, you have been part of the problem. Everyone seems to feel that they need to participate at the same level of vitriol as their opponents, and that is where this community breaks down. The admonition to have thick skin has to do with people disgreeing with you, not slamming you upside the head with rhetorical morning stars.

If we want this community to remain healthy, we need to police our own and speak up when someone goes over the line. It will save the mods a lot of time if we put some negative pressure on those that just cannot help but to treat fellow DUers like punching bags.

and I too notice a lot of, uh, juvenile comments. Obama ran as a centrist. He is well funded by Wall St. He cannot do much but he will do nothing if we do not keep informed (reality, not wishful thinking), and save our energy to push back corporate everything.

It's rare to see DU march in lockstep. For better or for worse, it is who we are.

And it's WAY better than the alternative.

:dem:

-Laelth

:rofl:

WOOOOOOAH, they were scary!

DU is, like all communities, a conglomeration of folks who just like to hang out, have a brew, and argue. Where better? There's intelligence, wit, compassion, insanity, fun, jelly beans and popcorn!!

I love this place - and you're right - nothing, NOTHING like family.

DU?

:hug::grouphug::thumbsup::grouphug::hug: