Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More On Monica Goodling...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 12:03 PM
Original message
More On Monica Goodling...
Bush Loyalist Rose Quickly at Justice

By Alan Cooperman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, March 30, 2007

<snip>

When a college intern in the Justice Department whined that all he was doing was filing and answering phones, Monica M. Goodling took him aside. If he wanted to do "substantive work," she told him, he was going to have to prove himself first.

The intern walked out of the office in a huff, and when he returned an hour later, Goodling took him aside again. "You're fired," she said.

"Some people in the office thought: 'Wow! That was tough,' " said Mark Corallo, her former boss in Justice's Office of Public Affairs, who recalled the incident. "But I thought, 'Good for her.' "

Part of a generation of young religious conservatives who swept into the federal government after the election of President Bush in 2000, Goodling displayed unblinking devotion to the administration and expected others to do the same. When she started at Justice, "no job was too small for her," and as she moved rapidly up the ranks, none "was too large," Corallo said.

"She was the embodiment of a hardworking young conservative who believed strongly in the president and his mission," said David Ayres, former chief of staff to Bush's first attorney general, John D. Ashcroft.

This week, Goodling, 33, became the most prominent federal official to invoke the Fifth Amendment to avoid testifying before Congress since Lt. Col. Oliver L. North refused to answer questions -- until he received immunity -- during the 1986 Iran-contra hearings.

<snip>

More: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/29/AR2007032901964.html

Gee Monica... way to rise to the top there girl!

So, are you afraid that congress is gonna treat you with the same understanding and compassion as you did that intern many moons ago???

Wassa matta tuff girl???

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueJac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. She is a f**king coward and a traitor to this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Pleading the Fifth should have constituted her resignation
and in an honest administration, it would have.

Admitting that one is guilty of a crime is bad enough in most parts of the government; it is unconscionable in the DOJ.

What sort of justice can honest people expect from criminals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. the republican way to f*ck your way to the top
by f*cking people over
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazer47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. All of these nut jobs sooner of later
will wind up with a felony conviction,, it may take awhile but it WILL happen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. before she worked at the DoJ...
..she was the protege of Barbara Comstock at the RNC's opposition research team. I kid you not. She is the product of Comstock's scorched earth style of politics of personal destruction.

And then she worked for Comstock at DoJ.

And Tim Griffin also worked under Comstock at DoJ as Barbara's deputy.

This is a bunch of thugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. I was listening to a nutjob on the radio who said pleading the 5th
does not necessarily mean you have done something wrong. What does it mean then?

IMHO, she need to be immediately investigated to see what she has done that she needs to plea the 5th. If she and her lawyers think she needs to invoke the 5th, then she has done something criminal that the truth will expose.

Wrote my congressman also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. That certainly is the implication - just what criminal act might she
implicate herself for? There is no right to avoid subpeona - the fifth is strictly, as you point out, about not implicating self in criminal act(s).

Clearly that nutjob thinks there is no need for courts in this country - as if "pleading the fifth" means not having to testify because one doesn't want to, or because the lawyers might be hostile ... doesn't work that way. If it did - imagine all of the courtcases grinding to a stop. Perhaps that rw radio nutjob is "pro criminal"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. Guess She Pleading The 5th To The House Too !!!
Link: http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/002931.php

I guess she flunked Morality 101 at Robertson's University.

And she seems so nice...



:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC