Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you think we will obtain convictions against Bush Officials for torture memos?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TheCoxwain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 11:36 AM
Original message
Poll question: Do you think we will obtain convictions against Bush Officials for torture memos?

Not rubukes, not Censures ...BUT CONVICTIONS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. from Holder's DoJ? Nope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. We would in a perfect world, but this isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. If they get to court, then the answer is yes. The trick is getting to court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah, sure. As soon as we convict Andrew Jackson for the Trail of Tears. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. Who is we? What is a conviction?
They've been tried and convicted on these pages by us.

US courts will never see a case brought to trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. Only if it's tightly crafted/scripted toward predetermined results that mimic "accountability"
M$M will spin and sell accordingly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corruptmewithpower Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. Justice for crimes against humanity is a rare occurance.
The International Military Tribunal was opened on 18 October 1945, in the Palace of Justice in Nuremberg. The first session was presided over by the Soviet judge, Nikitchenko. The prosecution entered indictments against 24 major war criminals and six criminal organizations - the leadership of the Nazi party, the Schutzstaffel (SS) and Sicherheitsdienst (SD), the Gestapo, the Sturmabteilung (SA) and the High Command of the German armed forces (OKW).
The indictments were for:
Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of crime against peace
Planning, initiating and waging wars of aggression and other crimes against peace
War crimes
Crimes against humanity

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Trials
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. As long as the US is an independent country, and the biggest kid on the block, no
If there were a real international/global system that the US answered to, then that would be a different story. However, as long as the US Government can choose to bomb/torture/sanction/whatever anyone it wants to, and no entity can actually stop it from doing so, then the answer is no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Trying to sue someone because of their analysis and personal judgement
is going to take one heck of a barrel of imagination and creativity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCoxwain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. If you can prove that the opinion was shaped with the INTENT to enabling torture - then I
Edited on Wed Apr-22-09 12:48 PM by TheCoxwain
think we have a case. Evidence DOJ can cite is that defendants ignored previous US cases in Vietnam where Convictions were brought against Water Boarding ( I heard this on WNYC - an NPR station)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. maybe not in this country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC