Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House may relieve DHS of cybersecurity role

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 08:14 AM
Original message
White House may relieve DHS of cybersecurity role


April 22, 2009 4:47 PM PDT
White House may relieve DHS of cybersecurity role
by Declan McCullagh


AN FRANCISCO--The federal official overseeing a 60-day review of the U.S. government's cybersecurity efforts indicated Wednesday that the final report recommends shifting more responsibilities to the White House.

"It provides the president with recommendations for a White House organizational structure that can effectively address cyberspace-related issues," Melissa Hathaway, acting cyberspace director for the White House's National Security and Homeland Security councils, said at the RSA computer security conference here.

At the moment, a division of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security coordinates nonmilitary cybersecurity activities and is responsible for building a national "response system" for online attacks and creating a "risk management program" for critical infrastructure.

Hathaway said her report--which has not yet been made public--was finished on Friday and has been sent to President Obama for his approval.

"This responsibility transcends the jurisdictional purview of individual departments and agencies because, although each agency has a unique contribution to make, no single agency has a broad enough perspective to match the sweep of the challenges," Hathaway said.

The announcement of the review led to speculation that the White House's National Security Council or the National Security Agency would be handed more cybersecurity responsibilities, along with a larger budget to carry them out. Although the 2002 law creating DHS centralized cybersecurity responsibilities, it has been repeatedly criticized by government auditors who concluded that DHS failed to live up to its responsibilities and may be "unprepared" for emergencies.

On Tuesday, NSA Director Keith Alexander downplayed reports of a power grab by his agency, saying, "We do not want to run cybersecurity for the U.S. government." The NSA has cybersecurity responsibilities for the U.S. military.

Alexander's remarks appeared to be a response to Rod Beckstrom, former director of Homeland Security's National Cybersecurity Center, whose resignation letter last month blasted what he described as an NSA power grab that could threaten "our democratic processes." That led some members of Congress--including the Democratic chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee--to object to NSA control, which Clinton-era FBI director Louis Freeh echoed a day later.

(...)


The RSA conference was punctuated by news reports of a discovery of $1.9 million infected zombie computers in a botnet and a report that hackers stole some specifications from the $300 billion Joint Strike Fighter project. (The Pentagon and Lockheed Martin, the primary contractor, said Wednesday that the report was incorrect.)


more:http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10225415-38.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. I wish they would relieve the US of DHS...
and TSA and the MCA and the unPATRIOTic Act, and the rest of the fascist creations of BushCo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's a long long list, that's for sure, for a conservative political party that used to claim
Edited on Thu Apr-23-09 09:38 AM by chill_wind
it wanted to be able to drown all of government in a small bathtub...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC