Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Rice Approved Torture - What Was Zelikow Trying To Do The Other Night......

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 02:13 PM
Original message
If Rice Approved Torture - What Was Zelikow Trying To Do The Other Night......
on Rachel's program? Didn't he say that Rice wasn't for the tactics either?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. While I don't recall every specific of what he said
Edited on Thu Apr-23-09 02:17 PM by Duer 157099
it's possible that he wrote the opposing memo and that when Rice saw how soundly they rejected (and then tried to destroy the evidence that it had ever existed!) she may have had a change of mind.

Good nazis are like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. I have to rewatch the State Department lawyer again to see if he exempted Rice.
I think Republicans are offering up Rice to see if that will be enough of a scapegoat. I'm sure they have all kinds of documents Cheney drew up with her signature on them.

I say if they take her down, the rest of the Bush administration should go with her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Hell Hath No Fury Like A Woman Scorned.......
I think if they try to scapegoat or sacrifice Rice to protect themselves - that Rice will not sit back and take it. I think she'll turn on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. cover his own ass
But as another DUer pointed out in another thread, The 9/11 Commission Report used evidence obtained by waterboarding.

They admit in their own document that they submitted the questions to the waterboarders, with the intent of using this information as evidence in their official report. Under the Nuremberg principles, any claims that those Commissioners make now, that they didn’t know about how the info was obtained, is completely irrelevant. This act of including information obtained by torture in an official proceeding is strictly verboten by all modern jurisprudence.

It stinks to high heaven, and you only have to be fair-minded to see that it all stinks. It’s just plain wrong!


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2841686#2841967

Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment

Article 15

Each State Party shall ensure that any statement which is established to have been made as a result of torture shall not be invoked as evidence in any proceedings, except against a person accused of torture as evidence that the statement was made.

http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/h_cat39.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yes, he did say Rice "who had grave concerns about all this"...
that is his exact quote from Rachel's interview. He is trying to protect his own ass, first and foremost, imo, but wasn't going to throw Rice under the bus....at least not yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. I don't think that he was wrth Rice at the time; Z was at State and Rice at the NSC
but I could be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. At the time he wrote the memo, he was working for her in the State Dep....
he makes that very clear in the interview.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. what is unclear is when Rice approved waterboarding -- while she was at NSC or at State
It was clear to me that Z was at State, but I had the impression that he served at State while she was still at the NSC.

If Z was objecting to the memos, that would have been during Bush's first term...sense the memos were rescinded around December of 2003.

Z is a hard guy to keep track of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. As has been reported, Rice approved of the torture in 2002 while she was
National Security Advisor and, it seems, Mr. Zelikow was working for her in re-drafting "an overview of America's national security strategy":

In Rise of the Vulcans (Viking, 2004), James Mann reports that when Richard Haass, a senior aide to Secretary of State Colin Powell and the director of policy planning at the State Department, drafted for the administration an overview of America’s national security strategy following the September 11, 2001 attacks, Dr. Rice, the national security advisor, "ordered that the document be completely rewritten. She thought the Bush administration needed something bolder, something that would represent a more dramatic break with the ideas of the past. Rice turned the writing over to her old colleague, University of Virginia Professor Philip Zelikow." This document, issued on September 17, 2002, is generally recognized as a significant document in the War on Terrorism.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Zelikow

From the Washington Post article yesterday:

Condoleezza Rice, John D. Ashcroft and other top Bush administration officials approved as early as the summer of 2002 the CIA's use at secret prisons of harsh interrogation methods, including waterboarding, a technique that new Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. has described as illegal torture, according to a chronology prepared by the Senate intelligence committee and declassified by Holder.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/22/AR2009042203141.html?hpid=topnews

Looking at the dates when Mr. Zelikow was doing the re-write and when Ms. Rice approved the torture, Mr. Zelikow would have been working for Ms. Rice at the time she okayed it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. CYA. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC