Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UAW Says Won't Control Chrysler

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:39 PM
Original message
UAW Says Won't Control Chrysler
The United Auto Workers president is seeking to distance his union from direct responsibility for the future of Chrysler LLC, noting 55% of the auto maker will be owned by a retiree health care trust fund and not the union itself.

"It's this independent trust that will own these shares," UAW President Ron Gettelfinger said...The trust--known as a Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association, or VEBA--is supposed to take ownership of 55% of Chrysler as part of a government-brokered cost-cutting plan that union workers ratified earlier this week...Mr. Gettelfinger also implied in the Fox interview that the UAW would be able to act independently, even strike if necessary, despite the fact that the union would own a critical piece of the company through the VEBA trust...

"The VEBA is CONTROLLED BY THE OUTSIDE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS who have been appointed by a judge to serve on that," he said. "We have less UAW representation on the VEBA. And as far as the board seat that the VEBA is going to get with the approval of the UAW, the voting will be done by independent directors….So, I don't see that conflict of interest issue."

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124120108093077927.html

So much for "The workers will own the company". For this joke the workers lost $5.3 BILLION in health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well thats why getting Healhcare done is very important.
Having said that, this deal was better than having the company go completely under and then what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. This was very predictable, but what's tragic is how little choice there was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Chrysler UAW workers approve concessions
ROCKFORD — If ever a landslide victory could be termed “reluctant,” it was today's approval by United Auto Workers Local 1268 members of contract concessions...“There’s not a lot of other options,” said Jeremy Endress of Capron, who has worked at the Belvidere plant for 10 years. “Either this goes through and we have work, or we’re all on the unemployment line.”

Even though the UAW would be a major beneficiary if Chrysler returns to profitability, the union will have no role in the day-to-day management of the company.

“I asked that question,” Jacques Walker of Rockford said. He was working for Chrysler in Detroit when he transferred to the Belvidere plant three years ago. “We’ll have someone sitting on the board of the (group administering health benefits), but we’ll have no say in how the company is run.”

Many of the concessions were related to health care, and several hurt Chrysler’s retirees. Workers said the new contract calls for higher co-pays, less prescription coverage, and the elimination of dental and vision care for retirees as of July 1.

Steve Kitzman, who lives near Waukegan and retired from the plant after 35 years, drove in only to be told that only active members could vote. “It’s kind of disappointing to drive down here,” Kitzman said. “They did make changes to some of the programs set up for retirees, and we don’t have any say in it.”


http://www.rrstar.com/archive/x303487643/Belvidere-Chrysler-workers-vote-on-concessions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. kicking it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. How many threads are you going to start about this one subject?
I appreciate you feel strongly about it, but is it worth multiple overlapping threads?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. works for pig flu.
Edited on Sat May-02-09 02:20 AM by Hannah Bell
maybe we could have a daily dedicated thread, tracing each shutdown & layoffs in every state, loss of promised health care, retirees whose pensions get cut...& every lie told...

because i'd bet good money right now there have been more us deaths traceable to this financial crisis than pig flu.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Not really. I've stopped reading flu threads here for just that reason.
Call me a stick-in-the-mud, but I don't really think shotgunning a topic gets more people on board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. Chrysler is going to go under regardless and now the union can be blamed
UAW knows this and is trying to distance itself from it, but in the public's mind it will be held as gospel that the unions destroyed the company
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC