Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Victim of Saddam Hussein's regime: 'Iraq was better off with tyrant Saddam in charge'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 11:18 AM
Original message
Victim of Saddam Hussein's regime: 'Iraq was better off with tyrant Saddam in charge'

http://www.bromleytimes.co.uk/content/bromley/times/news/story.aspx?brand=BMLYTOnline&category=news&tBrand=northlondon24&tCategory=newsbmlyt&itemid=WeED06%20May%202009%2016%3A31%3A30%3A157

A VICTIM of Saddam Hussein's regime claims Iraq was better under his rule and is calling for an inquiry into the war.

British forces officially pulled out of Iraq last Thursday, six bloody years after invading the wartorn country, but Tahrir Swift, from Orpington, claims her homeland has been left like a 'festering wound'.

She said: "This is not what the British people needed. Anybody who lives in Iraq will tell you it is worse than when Saddam was in power.

"Women cannot go out without a chaperone. There are murders and rapes happening all the time. The water is dirty and there is rubbish everywhere.

...

"I used to live on a nice street which was quite well off by the Tigress. Now everybody has gone. I say to my mother 'if you go back there you will be dead in 10 minutes'.

"The Iraqi people will never accept domination. Now the country is like Palestine, a festering wound. There should be an inquiry and not a whitewash like the Hutton Inquiry. It is easy to destroy and bomb and demolish. Rebuilding is a different story. I was a victim of Saddam. It is quite something when you can say it was better under a genocidal dictator."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rcrush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. DOH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. ditto DOH! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. "Now the country is like Palestine"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Mission Accomplished, eh? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Ugh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. but you can't convince the vast majority of US citizens that this
is the truth - I mean, we brought them democracy and Saddam was so evil, they have to be better off.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's a good thing they made a solid case of Saddam being a torturing murderer
that must be toppled while B*sh was being ah uhhhhh..... well you get the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. My old question.
"Who were Saddam Hussein's last 20 or so (serious) victims and when were they victimized?"

Was it the 1991 slaughter of Shiites whom Poppy Bush encourged to revolt but offered no protection? Did Saddam clean up his act after that? Why no discussion of this in the media?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conspirator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. For people with intelligence Iraq was never about human rights, it was about oil and
military industrial complex profiteering. And also ground testing of weaponry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yep
They openly admitted they had NO plan for peace.

6 years now. 6 bloody years. I wonder, Mr. Republicans, can I have empathy for the Iraqi people now? Would that be all right with you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. There were other reasons
The oil motive wasn't insignificant, but the two main reasons were in the PNAC doctrine:

1. It gives us a foothold in the ME, so that we're not beholden to places like Saudi Arabia or Pakistan to allow us to set up military bases. This lets us have a dominant presence in the ME. And it gives us a launching pad against other countries that might try to get uppity.

2. Another goal of US foreign policy is to keep other areas of the world in constant disruption. We don't want a unified ME, because they may unify against us. So, we keep them off balance, it allows the US to continue as the dominant military and economic power in the world. So, yes the Iraq invasion destabilized the ME -- that was its goal. Any talk of "spreading democracy" is just propaganda bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. A festering wound. Great analogy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. lol But the Iraqi people DID accept domination. That's the only thing they understand.
Which is why we need to withdraw ASAP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. This is all too tragic, but you have to at least giggle at the wording
British forces officially pulled out of Iraq last Thursday, six bloody years after invading the wartorn country,"

I wonder if the writer meant that in more than one way...:think:

It just jumped out at me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC