Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Our producers were instructed to feature two conservatives for every liberal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:20 PM
Original message
Our producers were instructed to feature two conservatives for every liberal
Edited on Wed May-13-09 08:28 PM by NNN0LHI
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/05/29/yellin/

Thursday May 29, 2008 06:03 EDT

CNN/MSNBC reporter: Corporate executives forced pro-Bush, pro-war narrative

<snip>In April of 2003, then-MSNBC star Ashleigh Banfield delivered a speech at Kansas State University and said that American news coverage of the Iraq war attracted high ratings but "wasn't journalism," because "there are horrors that were completely left out of this war." She added, echoing Couric:

The other thing is that so many voices were silent in this war. We all know what happened to Susan Sarandon for speaking out, and her husband, and we all know that this is not the way Americans truly want to be. Free speech is a wonderful thing, it's what we fight for, but the minute it's unpalatable we fight against it for some reason.

That just seems to be a trend of late, and l am worried that it may be a reflection of what the news was and how the news coverage was coming across. . . . I think there were a lot of dissenting voices before this war about the horrors of war, but I'm very concerned about this three-week TV show and how it may have changed people's opinions. It was very sanitized.

Shortly thereafter, Banfield was demoted, then fired altogether, and -- as Digby put it in her great analysis of Banfield's speech -- "she's now a co-anchor on a Court TV show."

At the same time, MSNBC fired the only real war opponent it had, Phil Donahue, despite very healthy ratings (the highest of any show on MSNBC, including "Hardball"). When interviewed for Bill Moyers' truly superb 2007 documentary on press behavior in the run-up to the war, Donahue reported much the same thing as Yellin, Couric, and Banfield revealed: snip

PHIL DONOHUE: You could have the supporters of the President alone. And they would say why this war is important. You couldn't have a dissenter alone. Our producers were instructed to feature two conservatives for every liberal.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. That damn liberal media!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
d_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Canning Donohue wasn't good enough
They had to bring in Savage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah, yeah, I know: We KNEW this was going on, but I'm going to K&R anyway.
It's about time people started talking about this openly. And often.

We're never going to be any good again unless and until we get our free press back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. 2004: Unlimited air to Swiftliars - OK. Kerry speech to Firefighters attacking Swifts - No airtime
Dem nominee's speech was DENIED airtime by every single news network. Few even reported it occurred and NONE would run the clips of the speech in even a regular news rotation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. Oh nooooooo!
The liberal media is taking over..... You can't turn on the teeeeeveeee without seeing a liberal -----
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well as an investor in GE, i certainly don't want their propoganda arm to work against the interests
of their military contractor/war profiteering arm. 'Twould be lunacy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. k&r n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. yet another reason I dumped my TV back then
never looked back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's good to see people still talking about this
The propaganda they inflicted on the citizens of this country should not be overlooked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livefreest Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. K&R we will still be discovering more crazy stuff about these last 8 years, 30 years from now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. Restore the Fairness Doctrine
The media did a far better job before Reagan repealed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Yeah...what the hell happened to the FCC under Obama?
SILENCE~!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoSheep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. Naturally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. It was blatant and egregious. I am still mad as all hell about it.
Edited on Thu May-14-09 08:16 PM by annabanana
That and the blackout on all coverage of the massive "Don't attack Iraq" and "Get out of Iraq" demonstrations, where millions of Americans hit the streets.. . The massive marches in DC that we had to catch on TRAFFIC CAMS for God's sake.

It left a taste in my mouth that will probably never clear. I'm nearly 60 and I don't see it getting cleansed in my lifetime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
konnichi wa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Millions all around the world too. We only got snips and bits of those...
from 'unapproved' sources.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
15. After Reading About This a Couple of Years Ago, I Wrote to Ashleigh Banfield...
At Court TV to tell her that I love her!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Getting fired was Ashleigh's reward for almost getting herself
killed on 9/11 reporting for those sleezebags. No good deed goes unpunished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. K&R...too late to vote...but thanks for this important post.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
19. Break up big media.
The problem isn't so much that media outlets are biased towards the ownership-- that's always been true. The problem is that there are exceedingly few owners, and they're all cross pollinated with the weapons industry, the energy industry, etc. Big media outlets are essentially PR wings for the conglomerates that own them.

Break them up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
21. I can understand why they had to schedule them 2:1.
It wouldn't have been a fair fight if it had been 1:1, now would it?:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
22. Sanitized, you betcha (graphic descriptions for the weak of stomach)
while USAmericans watched fearless reporters taking Tikrit on their own... (and that was funny and surreal for those of us watching at strange hours of the night)...

What did their counterparts in Mexico see? Well there was this piece of footage I saw on the news service. A Corpsman taking care of a US Trooper, I think Marine, at Nasaryah. The camera panned down to the missing two legs, Well rather mangled two legs, with white bone sticking up, and a pool of blood and a couple of tourniquets, and then to the face of the young man, pure sheer pain and eyes full of tears. And then it panned to the reporter describing the mess in that lone road, a mike in his hand, and an IV bag on the other.

And while USAmericans watched fearless troops advancing on Baghdad, their counterparts in Canada saw on CBC the collapsed building where the only thing visible were a pool of blood, and two legs covered in blue pants. Oh and a tank that had just run over an Iraqi, the run over victim was a tad flat... not kidding.

So yes, you could say it was sanitized...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC