Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Angers ACLU

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BlueJessamine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 07:36 AM
Original message
Obama Angers ACLU
Source: U.S.News

In what media reports are broadly describing as an about-face, President Obama announced yesterday that he will fight the release of photos allegedly showing US soldiers abusing detainees in Iraq and Afghanistan. The story generated coverage in all three network newscasts including the lead in two of them and earned front-page headlines in major newspapers. The ACLU and other groups are reported to be furious over the President's decision, but the overall tone of the coverage with some exceptions is more analytical that it is critical. On ABC World News, for example, George Stephanopoulos said: "The White House argues that first of all, the President did realize he could make new legal arguments. The second is, these commanders came in hard on the President. Gen. Odierno in Iraq, Gen. McKiernan in Afghanistan, Gen. Petraeus, and they said, you are harming our troops. The President was convinced by this argument."

NBC Nightly News said Obama's "reversal" was caused by "the concerns of US military commanders in Iraq and Afghanistan," who "warned the pictures could spark renewed attacks on US forces." The Politico, however, reports "legal experts are scoffing at the White House's chances of persuading the courts to consider new arguments against the release of photos of abused detainees, though a legislative fix under discussion in Congress might give...Obama the leeway he's seeking to keep the pictures secret."

McClatchy notes that "the timing of the president's decision suggests that a key factor behind his switch of position could have been a desire to prevent the release of the photos before a speech that he's to give June 4 in Egypt aimed at convincing the world's Muslims that the United States isn't at war with them." The AP says that "Obama, realizing how high emotions run on detainee treatment during the Bush administration and now, made it a point to personally explain his change of heart, stopping to address TV cameras late in the day as he left the White House for a flight to Arizona."

ABC World News added that "last week, the President told White House Council Greg Craig to prepare new legal arguments that releasing the photographs would harm national security -- an about-face that devastated officials of the ACLU, who thought they had an ally in the White House on issues of transparency about detainee abuse and torture." USA Today says "Obama's reversal puts him in step with some Republicans. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., sent kudos via Twitter. 'Strongly agree,' he said."


Read more: http://www.usnews.com/usnews/politics/bulletin/bulletin_090514.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks. Reminds me to donate MORE to the ACLU.
:thumbsup: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJessamine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Your welcome.
:fistbump:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. I am an ACLU card carrying member for a ton of years.
I sent my donation yesterday...they can thank the bullcrap from Obama for the large amount of money they got from me on this last donation.

They are on the correct side of this issue ~~ Obama is on the wrong side. Anytime Mitch and Lindsay line up with a position, simple logic tells us all it is the WRONG decision. IMO, Obama needs to look around and see who is lined up on his side of this controversy. Hint...

JMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Seems Cheney got to Obama.
All that Cheney the Dick talk on all the corporate medias finally did what it was suppose to do. Stop Obama from releasing evidence of Cheney's crimes. Good job FOX, ABC, NBC, AP and all you other corporate whores. This con job was about as good as convincing millions of Americans to back an illegal war in Iraq over imaginary WMDs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Excellent analysis.
By the way -- Lindsay Graham called. He wants his logic back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. Why would we worry about torture revelations in a speech in Egypt?
They torture suspects. The speech must be for our consumption and not Egypt's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. The ACLU? They're nuthin' but a bunch of lefty, extremist, troublemaking, Obama haters.
Aren't they? I expect the torture apologists will show up to tell you that soon enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC