Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dick Cheney Is Hoist On His Own Secrecy Petard

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 12:27 PM
Original message
Dick Cheney Is Hoist On His Own Secrecy Petard
http://www.openleft.com/diary/13351/dick-cheney-is-hoist-on-his-own-secrecy-petard

Dick Cheney Is Hoist On His Own Secrecy Petard
by: AdamGreen
Fri May 15, 2009 at 02:08


In my infinite spare time, I teach an Internet & Politics class at George Washington University's School of Media and Public Affairs.

One of my students, Farhan Daredia, now edits a legal news site called Main Justice with former WSJ/Salon reporter Mary Jacoby -- where he posted some interesting analysis about how Dick Cheney got screwed by Bush-Cheney anti-transparency policies:

The CIA on Thursday denied former Vice President Dick Cheney’s March 31 request to the National Archives and Records Administration for classified intelligence documents regarding the effectiveness and necessity of torture. Why? Because of an executive order made by President George W. Bush intended to complicate and overrule the Mandatory Declassification Review process. Oops.

In 1995, President Bill Clinton filed Executive Order 12958, an order intended to make the government more transparent...But Clinton was overruled by Executive Order 13292, signed by President George W. Bush on March 25, 2003. It amended the Clinton executive order, giving the Vice President essentially the same authority as the President in the classification process, and adding a number of exemptions to reject declassification requests:

{See lots of legal stuff on Farhan's post at link.}

What’s the conflicting litigation holding Cheney up? According to the letter rejecting Cheney’s request:

we have discovered that it is currently the subject of pending FOIA litigation (Bloche v. Department of Defense, Amnesty International v. Central Intelligence Agency).


...So, long story short, the documents Cheney wants declassified cannot be declassified because there is already a FOIA request to have the documents declassified, now that sounds like good old-fashioned Bush administration logic!


Good post, Farhan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not to mention, if it was important to our national security to
Edited on Fri May-15-09 12:30 PM by hedgehog
classify this information in the first place, what exactly has changed since then to make it safe to declassify this material now?


You don't suppose Cheney used military secrecy laws for political purposes, do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. What is a petard?
I'll have to look that up. Anything that would hoist that vile semi-human piece of shit though is good in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Here, from dictionary.com~
—Idiom
4. hoist by or with one's own petard, hurt, ruined, or destroyed by the very device or plot one had intended for another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dollface Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Noun - Etymology: Middle French, from peter to break wind, from pet expulsion of intestinal gas -
Somehow that seems fitting too in reference to Cheney
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think cheney knew that it couldn't be released
and that's why he asked for it. I think the GOP was hoping to spin it to make it seem that the Obama administration was refusing to release them to make the new admin look just as bad as bush's. I think they're trying to chip away slowly at Obama's approval ratings by implying that the new administrations stance on transparency was nothing but lip service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Bingo.
He can make any ridiculous and out of whack claim he wants and he knows he'll never have to account for it. All he has to do is say "Hey, I asked for the information, but now my hands are tied." He knew exactly what would happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. I wish Gibbs would point this out. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC