Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It sounds like this credit card legislation DOES control the APR

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TwixVoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 05:05 AM
Original message
It sounds like this credit card legislation DOES control the APR
From what I have read this credit card legislation will do the following (among other things)

*APR for past balances can NOT be changed just because the lender feels like it.

*APR for past balances can ONLY be increased if payments are not made for over 60 days.

*Even if payments are not made for over 60 days, the rate must go back down if the person continues to pay for six months

Sounds pretty good to me. People know how much they are going to pay APR wise if they carry a balance, and that rate can not be changed randomly on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's why they're all raising it now
BEFORE any new laws take effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. the msm has been talking about how the credit card companies will make a profit.
they can't target college kid, supposedly either... which i like. so, to make profits the cc companies may bring back annual fees and get rid of the perks. good. and a question i have is.... when did we get to the need for super crazy profits? i mean, wouldn't it be better to have a steady consistent profit rather than a super profit from those who may not be able to pay but you may not get paid? i tend to not have much sympathy for cc companies who courted folks with financial troubles already just because they could charge more interest. or courting college students, many of which who didn't even understand the concept of the credit cards. me, the only cc i have is connected to my bank account. and my husband has a home depot card because he needed a revolving credit for his credit score. the fact that they can rig our whole worthiness for credit to make it so we HAVE to have credit cards ticks me off. gotta have it to rent a hotel room or a car. grr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. Some people think borrowing money w/o collateral should be relatively cheap and easy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwixVoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Hopefully it won't be anymore
However... when you have an entire economy that produces little and is based on consumption using credit......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. This legislation is not as good as the
congressional leaders or the White House will claim. Nor is it as bad as some here would claim. I would have liked to see an absolute cap at 20% (some here have suggested 15%) to prevent usury. That is not in this bill because of the influence of the bankers on Congress. The protections against arbitrary rate hikes being applied to past balances is good.

If credit card companies start/continue jacking up rates in advance of this new law they should be called out on it. In the old days, we could count on some in the MSM to do that. Today not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. That's not how this reads....CS Monitor
http://features.csmonitor.com/politics/2009/05/19/credit-card-bill-what-it-does-what-it-doesnt-do/

Bank of America is raising rates right now on past balances. They can do it because they told us were going to do it.

Since I use it moderately, I will continue to use the card for online purchases. Hubby and I will put off other purchases we don't pay cash for.

Yes, they can jack up the rates with no limits on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. "-No cap on interest rates or fees."
-No cap on interest rates or fees. It does not put a maximum on the interest rates or fees that credit-card companies can charge consumers.

http://features.csmonitor.com/politics/2009/05/19/credit-card-bill-what-it-does-what-it-doesnt-do/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC