Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sibel Edmonds describes how media self-censorship subverts democracy.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 12:23 PM
Original message
Sibel Edmonds describes how media self-censorship subverts democracy.
Edited on Wed May-20-09 12:26 PM by JohnyCanuck
by keeping the public in the dark about the misdeeds of their government. Mind you, it allegedly to protect this "democracy" and to bring the benefits of "democracy" to the poor, benighted foreigners that the US military is fighting foreign wars and killing people half way around the globe.

From her blog:

I am going to provide you with another first-hand witnessed and documented incident. The only reason I am not naming ‘the well-known reporter & publication’ is to protect the source who obtained and passed on the incriminating documented evidence - the communication that occurred in writing between him and this particular ‘reporter.’

The individual who dealt with the congressional and press side of my case during the early stages of my whistleblowing journey wrote an e-mail to a well-known and well-placed journalist, saying, ‘Man, I can’t believe you guys did not cover this!!! Ashcroft comes out and invokes the State Secrets Privilege, first time ever asserted by the Bush administration, and you don’t write about it?! What the hell, man?! What’s the deal? I sent you the press release and attached a bunch of documents on that e-mail…’

Here is the response from that well-known journalist, and stupidly enough in writing: ‘I was going to call you. A few months ago I finally got this big DOJ guy, I mean BIG! Our deal-exclusive. You can’t do better than that in Washington. Anyhow, he doesn’t want us to touch Edmonds’ story. Period. I am not going to piss off my source for some God Damn translator whistleblower…’ (emphasis added /JC)

Oops, edited to add the link:
http://123realchange.blogspot.com/2009/05/dissecting-mainstream-media.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. We are not a meritocracy. We ARE an Aristocracy.
And anyone who disagrees with that statement is quite possibly an Aristocrat defending him/her-self from the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes and it is at such an epidemic proportion that it no longer
can really be classified as a free or independent press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. People in positions of power have convergent intere$ts, and it isn't "democracy" or altruism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. evening kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Does no one care anymore?
A statement like that from Sibel would have drawn 70 recs or so, back in the day.

:shrug:

Outrage fatigue?

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Everyone should visit her blog and offer support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thanks for mentioning that - I just went and signed up for her blog and left a comment
Mainstream news in this country should not be allowed to call itself news - it is nothing more than a distraction to keep the masses pacified. The info Sibel has IS news - vital news - and it is purposely passed over. They won't be able to keep her silent forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Very good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Found a comment of yours.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC