Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, Gavin Newsom asked the CA Supreme Court to delay its H8 ruling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 03:11 PM
Original message
So, Gavin Newsom asked the CA Supreme Court to delay its H8 ruling
so it won't coincide with the anniversary of the White Night Riots, and probably, with Harvey Milk's birthday on the 22nd:

Exclusive: SF Mayor Gavin Newsom Asked Court to Delay Prop 8 Ruling

Confidential sources close to San Francisco City Hall told Towleroad's Corey Johnson that the California Supreme Court was prepared to release its opinion on Proposition 8 tomorrow, but decided to delay the ruling after a call from Mayor Gavin Newsom.

Newsom"Newsom reached out to the Supreme Court and asked them to hold off releasing their decision so it did not coincide with the White Night riots," said our source.

As mentioned earlier, a ruling Thursday would have fallen on the 30th anniversary of the San Francisco riots, which were set off when the court handed down the most lenient decision possible (voluntary manslaughter) against Dan White for the murders of supervisor Harvey Milk and Mayor George Moscone. The ensuing riots in San Francisco on May 21, 1979 caused hundreds of thousands of dollars in damage.

http://www.towleroad.com/2009/05/exclusive-sf-mayor-gavin-newsom-asked-court-to-delay-prop-8-ruling.html#comments

This sounds very ominous to me. :(

Does anyone know if there are any demonstrations planned in the event of the worst case scenario?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ComtesseDeSpair Donating Member (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. All I know is...
Mormon churches better batten down the hatches!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The puppeteer was our Arch Bishop here in San Francisco.
He invited them into it.

I was hoping someone would organize a march to his HQ.

The archdiocese is currently led by Archbishop George Hugh Niederauer, who was formerly the bishop of the Diocese of Salt Lake City and installed on February 15, 2006. The current auxiliary bishop of the archdiocese is Ignatius C. Wang, the first Asian-American and Chinese-American appointed to the office of bishop. <4> On 10 April 2008 it was announced that Pope Benedict XVI appointed William J. Justice as the Auxiliary Bishop to serve the Archdiocese of San Francisco. <5> Pope Benedict XVI did this announcement, along with the appointment of five other bishops, five days before he began his Apostolic Journey to the United States. He was installed as Auxiliary Bishop of San Francisco by Metropolitan Archbishop of San Francisco George Hugh Niederauer on 28 May 2008 at the Cathedral of Saint Mary of the Assumption.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Catholic_Archdiocese_of_San_Francisco
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. THE WHITE NIGHT RIOT


On May 21, 1979. ex-cop, ex-fireman, ex-supervisor of San Francisco, Dan White was found guilty of manslaughter for the murder of Mayor George Moscone and Gay Supervisor Harvey Milk. White was given a 7-year sentence (in truth, 4 years) for killing two of our leaders. The entire city was in shock. As evening approached, a crowd gathered at Castro and Market. We were angry. We wanted the world to know we were angry. We took over Castro Street and stood around with no idea of what we should do. Eventually the crowd moved into the intersection of Castro and Market. Traffic came to a standstill. There were only a few policemen present and they did nothing more than observe the scene. As time passed, the crowd grew larger, eventually exceeding 1000. TV News trucks arrived. More police arrived. Amid the shouting and whistle blowing, there were shouts from the crowd. "CITY HALL" became the rallying cry.

http://thecastro.net/milk/whitenight.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cecilfirefox Donating Member (404 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I suspect this was probably a good decision. Again, let's not assume anyone knows the decision prior
to it's release. It's very possible the San Fran police department just asked the court to give it a heads up regardless. Remember, there were people in the street when In Re: Marriage Cases was passed celebrating. We may be reading into this, but I do suspect they will uphold the proposition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
konnichi wa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Do you think the court will invalidate the marriages performed when they were legal too?
If they do (and I have no reason to believe either way) it might very well ignite some violence. I hope not but I wouldn't blame some people...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cecilfirefox Donating Member (404 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Personally, I do not. Look in the post for further explanation.
The responses of Justices from all side of In Re: Marriage Cases showed a pretty staunch balking at the notion that Prop 8 would invalidate or forcibly divorce/annul the pre-existing marriages. Had the language of Prop 8 been explicit, then yes they would be non-existent now. However, whether it will have that effect now as it stands is open to interpretation. Personally, after having watched everything online, I can say I don't think they will do that.

However, I do think they will invalidate marriages performed after Prop 8 passed, of which there were several.

:/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Reading and reading into are two different things.
Newsom would have no reason to ask for a delay if the news was good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Newsom would (should) have no way of knowing
what the news will be. It seems to me that he is probably trying to be cautious in case the news turns out to be bad. I have seen speculation, based on the judges' demeanors during oral argument, that the news is bad, but that is not always an accurate predictor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Good point.
I don't want to borrow trouble. But, at the same time, I will never forgive me for not being more proactive ahead of H8. That's why I posted this thread. Being a straight ally is tricky. You want to take the lead from the community but if you only wait, you're not much of an ally, are you?

Let's see if we can gather up some information so we can be responsive and not only reactive this time.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Agreed.
I think a favorable decision could be every bit as likely as an unfavorable one. Trying to guess judge's decisions based on the questions they ask during argument is not always much of an indicator. Some judges like to be their own Devil's Advocate and love demonstrating that during oral argument.

Unfortunately, if it is close, jurists tend to have a hard time choosing to overturn a vote of the people. Hopefully this group decides that equality and equal justice under the law is an important enough basis for doing so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. Uncle Donald's page of Harvey Milk photographs + the story


http://thecastro.net/milk/milkpix.html

Harvey Milk was born May 22, 1930 in Woodmere, Long Island, New York. He became a successful Wall Street investment analyst and supported Barry Goldwater for president. In the late 1960's he got involved in Tom O'Horgan's Broadway production of HAIR through his boyfriend Jack McKinley, the stage manager. Exposure to the counterculture began eroding his conservative values. When HAIR opened in San Francisco in 1969, McKinley became the stage manager, and Harvey soon followed him west and took a job as a financial analyst in the City. Unhappy with the political scene, he decided that he wanted to be Mayor of San Francisco! His new found liberalism, his charisma, weird sense of humor, and belief in politics as theater, set the stage for his San Francisco political career.

http://thecastro.net/milk/milk.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. Gay Marriage Decision Expected Soon
Preliminary plans for protests and celebrations already put together
By JACKSON WEST
Updated 1:11 PM PDT, Wed, May 20, 2009

A ruling on the constitutionality of Proposition 8, the statewide ballot measure that bans same-sex marriages, is expected as early as next week. The ruling could have come as early as tomorrow, but the court announced Wednesday that it will not rule Thursday.

There are only three days left when they can rule. That means it will happen next Tuesday, next Thursday or Monday June 1.

`snip`

Organizers for both sides say they will be sending out emails and text messages the instant a decision is made public.

Plans are already in place for protests or celebrations, depending on the outcome and the organization.

http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Prop-8-Decision-Expected-Tomorrow-jw.html

It looks like there will be a rally at 5pm @ City Hall on the day of the ruling no matter which way it goes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keepCAblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. check out dayofdecision.com for a rally near you...also, on Sat following ruling, BIG meet in Fresno
http://www.dayofdecision.com/

http://www.meetinthemiddle4equality.com/

Fresno City Hall, 1 p.m., regardless of which way decision goes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Thank you, keepCAblue! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. Newsom's request makes me WANT to riot. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I sure tensed up when I heard about it.
I haven't done any demonstrating for about 18 months. But, I'm thinking we should organize a demonstration of some kind at the Archdiocese for the night of the verdict because that man is the real culprit in this situation. He was the architect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Already plans afoot
http://dayofdecision.wetpaint.com/page/San+Francisco

Though the diocese would be a good target.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I want to shove a sign in his face "Your H8 is a SIN, Father".
He was the quarterback in all of this and he's getting off, scot free. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
14. Kick for information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. With all the misinformation floating around to day...
why believe this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
21. This is not true - Newsom is denying it
"Lots of tweets about me and supreme court today, not correct – if I could influence court, would use it to support marriage equality."


http://twitter.com/GavinNewsom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Thanks, FreeState. If Newsom were on the ball, he'd issue a statement
today beyond twitter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. his office did
Statement from Nathan Ballard, Communications Director, Mayor Gavin Newsom on Propositon 8 Ruling

05/20/09 - Today a website posted an item that quoted a false allegation from an unnamed source: "Mayor Newsom reached out to the Supreme Court and asked them to hold off releasing their decision so it did not coincide with the White Night riots."

This allegation is not true. We have asked the website to correct the item immediately.
http://www.sfgov.org/site/mayor_index.asp?id=104640
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Right. Just got off the phone with his office.
Edited on Wed May-20-09 05:58 PM by EFerrari
But denying that allegation is not exactly an act of leadership during this tense moment. He should get out there and show some positive support and some direction for what looks to be an almost week long delay, imho.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
25. Can't get thru to Newsom's press office to ask if he will make a statement
ahead of the decision. Will keep trying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC