Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A. Q. Khan? Did you really go there Dick?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 07:55 PM
Original message
A. Q. Khan? Did you really go there Dick?
Edited on Thu May-21-09 08:12 PM by hootinholler
One of the thugs on the loose we needed to keep an eye on? Wasn't he one of the dudes that Brewster Jennings was keeping an eye on right before you leaked Valerie Plame's identity as an agent and dismantled that asset?

Was that a boast or a dig, Dick? You fucking traitor. I will see you in jail.

Edit to add the money quote:
This was the world in which Al Qaida was seeking nuclear technology and A.Q. Khan was selling nuclear technology on the black market. We had the anthrax attack from an unknown source. We had the training camps in Afghanistan and dictators like Saddam Hussein with known ties to Mideast terrorists.


I mean he really went there.


-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. It was Cheney's "I am not a crook" speech. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think it's stunning!
This was the world in which Al Qaida was seeking nuclear technology and A.Q. Khan was selling nuclear technology on the black market. We had the anthrax attack from an unknown source. We had the training camps in Afghanistan and dictators like Saddam Hussein with known ties to Mideast terrorists.


I mean he really went there.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. That really was
the icing on the cake.

Nominated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I wonder if anyone in the media will notice?
Thanks, I always know I'm on a reasonable path when you reply.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I do not believe
that anyone in the corporate media is allowed to notice this .... not in the sense of being able to point it out and discuss it honestly. Thank goodness for the internet, and people such as our friend Robert P., who did DU proud documenting that connection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. It may be time for a reprise of American Judas.
:shrug:

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. I agree!
"Calling RP!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #18
75. Present! Look who else is staying on top of this.
Luke Ryland is still doing great research on this subject:


Thursday, May 21, 2009
CIA and the Nuclear Black Market

In June 2008, I wrote about the destruction of evidence in a nuclear black market case involving A.Q. Khan, the CIA, and the Swiss government. Now we have some more interesting news.

Background
One of AQ Khan's key suppliers to his nuclear black market (as well as the Pakistani bomb) was a Swiss family - Urs, Marco and Friedrik Tinner. Urs Tinner was under investigation by the French authorities and the CIA told Tinner that they could make his French problems, and any other problems, go away if Tinner became an agent for the CIA.

Tinner agreed to inform for the CIA, and fed them some information when he was working for AQ Khan in Malaysia, building Libya's nuclear weapons program, but when the CIA eventually exposed the AQ Khan network, Tinner kept a digital copy of the 'nuclear blueprints' which he could then sell on the nuclear black market for his personal profit.

In 2004, Tinner was arrested in Germany, along with his brother and father, and extradited to Switzerland. In May 2008, while Urs Tinner was in jail awaiting prosecution, the Swiss President announced that, six months earlier, he had destroyed ALL files related to the Tinners case. These files included not just the nuclear blueprints, but also any evidence that the Tinners had been working with the CIA. This caused an uproar in Switzerland, with the Swiss courts and Swiss parliament outraged that the President apparently made this decision unilaterally. The President claimed that he destroyed the documents so that they didn't fall into the hands of terrorists, a patently nonsensical claim. Most observers agreed that the Swiss President was actually doing the bidding of the CIA.

more...

http://lukery.blogspot.com/2009/05/cia-and-nuclear-black-market.html


And continued ...


Thursday, May 21, 2009
Douglas Frantz and Nuclear Black Market

A couple of extra notes regarding my earlier post, CIA and the Nuclear Black Market. I was going to post them in that piece, but didn't want to cover too many issues at once.

Well Regarded
By all accounts, the SFRC's Douglas Frantz is a good investigator and well-regarded. His 2007 book (co-written with his wife) on AQ Khan, The Man from Pakistan: The True Story of the World's Most Dangerous Nuclear Smuggler, was well-received (also see Adrian Levy's Deception: Pakistan, the United States and the Secret Trade in Nuclear Weapons, and William Langewiesche's The Atomic Bazaar: Dispatches from the Underground World of Nuclear Trafficking).

From memory, Frantz' book did a reasonable job covering Turkey's role in the nuclear black market in terms of publicly-available facts, noting the role of Selim Alquadis and Gunes Cires in supplying Libya, Iran and Pakistan. He also noted that some of the equipment from Turkey that was supposed to be on the ship, BBC China, when it was intercepted in 2003 on the way to Libya, went missing.

Some Questions
On the other hand, Frantz did not mention some important information regarding Zeki Bilmen and his New Jersey-based company, Giza Technologies. Former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds overheard Zeki Bilmen on wiretaps, apparently organizing the sale and/or delivery of nuclear hardware with the Turkish embassy in Washington DC. Bilmen and Giza were finally exposed in 2003 , years after Sibel overheard them, when they were caught sending illegal nuclear hardware to the AQ Khan network.

more...

http://lukery.blogspot.com/2009/05/douglas-frantz-and-nuclear-black-market.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:42 PM
Original message
they never seemed to notice it
when it was news to begin with... doubt they will now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
23. La La!
You always make me smile when you pop my bubble :D

:hug:

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. LMAO
I don't mean to:( I am sorry. I just call it like i see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Oh but it feels so good out here in reality!
I'm a big boy, I can take it hon ;)

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #31
70. You can Google it and there's a lot there.
But I don't know how many of our vaunted press corps really keep up on this stuff. However, I'm certainly going to use it when I encounter a repuke bigmouth talking about how Cheney kept us safe...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
58. Dick Cheney is a stateman who tried his level best to keep us safe.
He's a pragmatic realist who understands that dirty work has to be done, "sometimes you have to work the dark side, a little". He is only coming out and saying these things because he just loves his country so so much. Obama is forcing him to come out, with his dangerous policies. Yes, he may have 'stretched the truth' in the past, but I'm sure he's not doing that now. And besides, if he did, it was for our own good. There are just some things we shouldn't ever have to know.



I know all these things are true because my TEEVEE told me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Ditto. He referenced so many of his own crimes with a straight face.
For me the jaw dropper was when he called Abu Ghraib a crime, ignoring the fact that he ordered it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. The guy made so many
statements that exposed the internal fears -- which he wants to infect the public with -- that I was at times amazed. It was really the ranting of a disturbed individual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Sneering about "Truth Commissions" - that was exactly the truth of why he made the speech
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. He ranted about
a possible "Truth Commission," as well as the possibility of criminal prosecution. It is obvious that these are thoughts that bother him. Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. It was really the ranting of a disturbed individual
Disturbed and scared 'shitless'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. He seemed to be
more concerned that he will eventually become a target of a legal investigation than I thought he would be. I suspect that he has sources of information telling him that he is not in the clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Absolutely
The line I found most telling today was:
Those are the basic facts on enhanced interrogation. And to call this a program of torture is to libel the dedicated professionals who have saved American lives and to cast terrorists and murderers as innocent victims. What's more, to completely rule out enhanced interrogation in the future is unwise in the extreme. It is recklessness cloaked in righteousness and would make the American people less safe.

Cheney is only concerned with 'the dedicated professional' Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. When I watched him,
I remembered how he had been scheduled to testify at his buddy Scooter's trial. He could have helped his friend. But, instead, when he realized the possible consequences, he sat the trial out on the sidelines. You may recall that he had his limo speed past the court, after the jury verdict was read.

Now, the guy is out in front, on various television shows, and giving the speech today. He isn't chattering to save anyone else. Just himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. It's always about the Dick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. It was despicable passing of the buck, saying the "dedicated professionals"
bore the responsibility for bearing the blame Obama was dishing out so fearlessly.

Like blaming Abu Ghraib on the soldiers. Cheney is a coward. He is still seeking deferments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. He's terrified by all the talk of truth commissions, he outright said so.
And that is the whole point of this media tour. Don't taze me, America!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #35
43. Poor Dick
He'll die a coward. As H2O man points out he left Scooter to fall because he was scared he'd be found guilty. Then he blamed Bush for not pardoning him.
No wonder he's so afraid. Poppy and W are dead quiet and Poppy will help take down Cheney if it sanitizes his idiot son's legacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. I'll see your Poppy card and raise you
a Rumsfeld. I've been wondering if Rummy may have positioned himself so that Cheney would have to take the fire if all this shit hit the fan.

And I agree that Poppy would sacrifice Cheney if it would rehabilitate one iota of W's reputation. Just as Rummy will sacrifice Cheney to preserve his own hide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. And just as Cheney left Scooter holding the bag n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. His demeanor was surprising to me.
I've never seen him so visibly nervous, defensive, and even fearful. The swagger and condescension were replaced by something almost like a mixture of pleading and scolding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why are we surprised?
Nothing that fat fuck does should surprise us, but, because we're not sociopaths, we are always surprised. And baffled. And warned.

He lies. That's all he does - he lies.

This thought just occurred to me (I'm rather slow) - if torture works so well, how come we didn't torture every detainee and just get all the information we wanted and needed?

I've now confused myself.......................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
46. If torture works so well
Edited on Thu May-21-09 09:46 PM by Patsy Stone
why do you have to do it 83 times? With this psychopath in charge, after the first one didn't work, the next 82 of them were probably just for sport.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. If there was a ticking time bomb, apparantly this ain't the way to go.
Unless the timer kept saying 00:02 for a month or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #48
56. Reading this speech is nauseating.
False choice alert!

"So we're left to draw one of two conclusions, and here is the great dividing line in our current debate over national security. You can look at the facts and conclude that the comprehensive strategy has worked and therefore needs to be continued as vigilantly as ever. Or you can look at the same set of facts and conclude that 9/11 was a one-off event, coordinated, devastating, but also unique and not sufficient to justify a sustained wartime effort."


Begging the question, Dick, where was this desire to protect the US on September 10th?

"9/11 made necessary a shift of policy, aimed at a clear strategic threat: what the Congress called an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. From that moment forward, instead of merely preparing to round up the suspects and count the victims after the next attack, we were determined to prevent attacks in the first place."


Sorry ass legal defense alert!

"We did not invent that authority. It's drawn from Article Two of the Constitution, and it was given specificity by Congress after 9/11 in a joint resolution authorizing all necessary and appropriate force to protect the American people."


Lawyers! You don't need no stinking lawyers!

"Maybe you've heard that when we captured Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, he said he would talk as soon as he got to New York City and saw his lawyer. But like many critics of interrogations, he clearly misunderstood the business at hand. American personnel were not there to commence an elaborate legal proceeding, but to extract information from him before al-Qaida could strike again and kill more of our people."


(ed note: Love the like many critics of interrogations bit; nice touch.)

I'm only half way through, and I'm not really even trying to put all the pieces together, but this whole speech reads like a confession of a Bond villain right before his hideout is destroyed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. Great points.
And, hearing the speech adds another dimension.

And your point about it reading like a Bond villain's final confession is eminently worthy of its own post, incorporating your other observations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. I still have to digest all that garbage.
There's way too much evil in there for a little girl to read right before bedtime.

p.s. Best response on an MSNBC message board about the speech:

"Cheney pooped in his pants on 9/11 and hasn't had the guts change his drawers yet b/c no other attacks have occurred while his pants have been dirty."

-- Jill, Philadelphia, PA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. Cheney is proof that stuff swept under the rug always resurfaces more disgusting than before. Here's
some background on A. Q. Kahn

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. I thought AQ Khan ceased direct involvement in nuclear smuggling in 2003.
Edited on Thu May-21-09 08:25 PM by Occam Bandage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. Saddam had known ties to US terrorists.
Cheney was trading with Iraq when he was head of Haliburton....why isn't this treasonous, war profiteering bastard in jail?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. i was frankly very shocked...
and that is an understatement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. It reminded me of GHW Bush bringing up the JFK assassination
at Ford's funeral.

It's like some kind of Tourette's Syndrome of political villiany.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. I am sure
others who heard this were plenty offended, ya know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
33. Good call.
By the way, have you read Russ Baker's book, "Family of Secrets"? It was published earlier this year. If you haven't read it, do. It reads like a good DU thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. I'm putting it at the top of my list.
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #33
67. I read it.
The Bushes make other family dynasties look like amateurs. They had their paws in everything if all is to be believed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. Paging robertpaulsen. robertpaulsen to the white courtesy phone, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
61. Mr. Paulsen's chronicles of treason deserve more than a Pulitzer.
Robert Paulsen deserves a Nobel Prize for Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #61
74. I normally don't have this type of reaction.
:blush::blush::blush::blush::blush::blush::blush::blush::blush::blush::blush::blush::blush::blush:

I would gladly share both prizes with you. You need to publish Know Your BFEE: The Novel. I will buy it the first day it hit the book stores!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #14
73. Speaking!
There is no depth to Cheney's depravity. None. If it was proven that the reason why Cheney was so paranoid in the days after 9/11 taking Cipro and wearing a gas mask was because he actually mailed the damn anthrax spores himself, it would not surprise me in the slightest. He is that evil.

I've had a number of people ask me to join a Facebook group Telling Dick Cheney to Shut the Hell Up. I say the more he talks, hopefully, the bigger the hole he digs for himself. If Obama and Holder are not willing to prosecute him federally, there will be an international day of reckoning. There must, or the very concept of justice is in grave danger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
19. Cheney sold Khan the works.
Thanks for catching the crook, hootinholler! The incompetent prick thinks people won't remember.

Know your BFEE: Cheney & Halliburton Sold Iran Nuke Technology

This should wipe the sneer of his puss:

How Cheney Got His SNEER: The Curse of Dick Cheney

Too bad sociopaths have no conscience. He might regret the life he's been living.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Just as surely
as Rumsfeld sold/gave arms to Saddam, during the war between Iraq and Iran. These people do not have the least bit of goodness in them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. Wow I seem to have attracted the old gang with this.
Edited on Thu May-21-09 08:59 PM by hootinholler
Now it's my turn Der Fishie, Thanks for giving a damn!

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Class reunion!
Great thread!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. Woo Hoo! Dick's back and so are we.
One day we'll nail that fucker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #36
60. He has a lot to account for.
On freeing A.Q. Khan and channeling our inner Cheney

What it means, there are a lot of loose nukes out there, thanks to Sneer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
25. "We had the anthrax attack from an unknown source."
The phrasing struck me as peculiar as soon as he said it, especially in juxtaposition to the Khan reference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #25
37. It was like the short list of his major crimes
Summed up for the jury
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. And the omissions are also instructive:
for example, the fact that so many of the interrogations were done by contractors. Contractors!! There's another whole thread of infamy to follow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Exactly! And calling Abu Ghraib criminal, when he ordered it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. And Lize Cheney is on CNN at this moment
repeating his lies, and being caught on it by Anderson Cooper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #42
49. Why is anyone listening to Liz Cheney
Having her on programs is beyond vulgarity. Never have I seen the child of a politician defend her parent's position, It's sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. Interestingly, someone told her to stop calling Dick "the vice president" and to call him "my dad".
She was very consistent in both her old habit and her new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizfeelinggreat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. but ...
she's not a child and she held a political position in her father's administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #25
47. The unknown source,
conveniently, turned out to be that dead guy over there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
50. A Q Khan is a SCARY, EVIL name which will SCARE people
It's probably made up, too. But it's SCARY. Sounds like an evil Star Trek character. SCARY! OOOOOOHHH. A Q Khan!! Be ascared! Really ascared!

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #50
54. AQ Khan is one of the scariest people of the past decade.
I'm actually surprised Bush didn't turn him into a household name. Probably to avoid offending Pakistan, where he's revered as a hero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #54
72. There's no way * would have gone there.
Put Khan on the table and it drags a bunch of other names in also. Like Poppy, Denny Hastert, Dick Cheney, possibly Rumsfeld and the whole Dubai gang.

-Hoot

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
53. Twice
He went there twice.

"We did all of these things and, with bipartisan support, put all of these policies in place. It has resulted in serious blows against enemy operations: the takedown of the A.Q. Khan network and the dismantling of Libya's nuclear program."

K&R


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
55. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
62. Goes with the territory (creating your own reality) as far as Dick is concerned irrelevant that NO
ONE else buys into his artificial reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
63. When Dick dropped that name,
I dropped my jaw.

I had the exact same reaction when Cheney said this during the 2004 Vice Presidential debate:

Twenty years ago we had a similar situation in El Salvador. We had—guerrilla insurgency controlled roughly a third of the country, 75,000 people dead, and we held free elections. I was there as an observer on behalf of the Congress.

The human drive for freedom, the determination of these people to vote, was unbelievable. And the terrorists would come in and shoot up polling places; as soon as they left, the voters would come back and get in line and would not be denied the right to vote...


Cheney is a special kind of evil, stuffing the skeletons of history with his lies and covering the body with the skin he sheds twice a year.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #63
64. "I was there as an observer."
That sends a chill up my spine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
65. AM kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
66. jaw dropping.. can't breathe...
stunning chutzpah. . . daring God to strike him dead on the spot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
68. I really don't think that AQ Khan
Edited on Fri May-22-09 06:53 AM by Are_grits_groceries
would even register with most Americans. They didn't gin up enough hysteria about him. That's probably because there are connections that they don't want to see the light of day.
If people think of Kahn, they think "Star Trek." The base probably now thinks Trekkies are terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #68
69. But Cheney couldn't help himself. He was compelled to deny everything so Khan made the list.
He set all of his crimes out there as a big FU to the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #69
71. Probably true.
If everyone runs to the intertubes to clog teh Google, they might get a twee bit disturbed, I'm not sure they would. I think people have "fear fatigue." With the economy, the wars, Swine flu and whatever else, I don't think most people have energy to waste on Dick's trip down memory lane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
76. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC