Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The house that taxpayers built

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 10:12 AM
Original message
The house that taxpayers built
The house that taxpayers built

New York's billionaire mayor used public funds to build the new Yankee Stadium for the richest team in sports.







The New York City mayoral race, which wound up becoming the most expensive non-Presidential race in U.S. history, pitted incumbent Mayor Michael Bloomberg (R) against Fernando Ferrer (D), a former Bronx Borough President (1987-2002). Bloomberg was first elected in November 2001 after a costly race to succeed the two-term mayor Rudolph Giuliani. Bloomberg ran against New York City Public Advocate Mark Green (Bloomberg ended up beating Green 50-47%) and was alleged to have spent $70 million of his fortune (Bloomberg was a partner at Salomon Brothers until 1981 and started his own securities data and media conglomerate in 1982) in the race.
http://www.lib.umich.edu/govdocs/elec2005/elec2005index3.html




By David Sirota

May. 23, 2009 |


Somewhere, likely in a basement, the next great documentarian is scavenging YouTube for clips of congressional inquisitions, Wall Street perp walks, and CNBC rants for a future Oscar-winning film about the times we're living through. I'm hoping this future star calls her film "Wall Street II: Cataclysmic Boogaloo," and more important, I'm hoping she gets footage of New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, preferably wearing a top hat and monocle.



Even amid CEO testimony, Bernie Madoff grimaces and Rick Santelli diatribes, nothing better captures the moment's destructive greed than a billionaire politician using the municipal office he bought to defend charging $2,500 a ticket to a new Yankee Stadium he forced the public to finance. If there is a single act showing how kleptocracy and let-them-eat-cake-ism are systemic and local rather than momentary and exclusively federal, Bloomberg turning the House that Ruth Built into the House That Taxpayers Built is it.



Foreign oligarchs use guns to confiscate citizens' wages. American oligarchs rely on government to give theft the aura of legitimacy, and Manhattan's richest man is no exception. As an investigation by Democratic Assemblyman Richard Brodsky documents:


Bloomberg used various public agencies to extract between $1 billion and $4 billion from taxpayers and then spent the cash on a new stadium for the Yankees, the wealthiest corporation in sports.







The move followed a Bloomberg-backed 2005 initiative giving infamous investment bank Goldman Sachs $1.6 billion in taxpayer-financed bonds to construct its new headquarters -- and amazingly, this encore rip-off is more spectacular. Mimicking tax cheats' deliberately complex transactions, the city owns the stadium, leases it to an agency, which then leases it to a corporate subsidiary, which then leases it to the Yankees. At the end of the Ponzi scheme, the team is permitted to use the taxes it already owes to pay off the mortgage on its new chateau.



New Yorkers might be celebrating if these giveaways delivered verifiable returns to taxpayers. But Brodsky’s report notes that "there is little in new job creation, private investment, or new economic activity" from the expenditure. Taxpayers don't even get affordable seats. According to Newsday, they get a stadium charging the highest ticket prices in baseball -- $2,500 for "premium" views (since reduced to "just" $1,250) and $410 for a family of four in the cheap seats.



Like Wall Street firms insisting that trillion-dollar bailouts are a small price for economic stability, Bloomberg justified everything first by saying taxpayers "put next to nothing" into the stadium. (In fairness, a media-mogul mayor who is the planet's 17th wealthiest man may genuinely believe a few billion is "next to nothing" -- but, for comparison, it's more than all the devastating cuts to police, firefighting, school and infrastructure budgets that he proposed in his budget.)



Then Bloomberg offered the same laissez-faire paean that financial CEOs cite in opposing executive pay caps. "Don't ever think sports is anything but a business," he said, joining bankers in selectively forgetting that arguments for free-market "business" ring hollow when government is propping up said "business."



If this tale of the House that Taxpayers Built was some anomaly, it might be vaguely funny. But while Bloomberg sets milestones for avarice, the bailout-ism he espouses is the norm.



In Washington, "The Obama administration has broken all records in the distribution of taxpayer dollars to American businesses, primarily banks, automobile manufacturers and insurance companies," reports the Huffington Post. At the local level, lawmakers trip over themselves to throw giveaways at corporate campaign donors.



In the new Gilded Age, socializing risk and privatizing profit has become the standard -- as American as General Motors, Bank of America and, yes, the New York Yankees.
http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2009/05/23/sirota/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's actually not as bad as Pittsburgh and Philly where taxpayers voted AGAINST
building these stadiums and the cities built them at taxpayers' expense anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. There must be no end to higher-ups
picking our pockets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. I can't be objective. I hate baseball.
I still don't understand how it is that taxpayer dollars need to be spent to build facilities for successful businesses. Why not build Chrysler a new building? The excuse is always the amount of revenue these teams supposedly generate. Ask the average person in St Petersburg Florida how much tangible prosperity the Devil Rays generate. I'm guessing a significant portion of them won't even know what you are talking about.

But I guess I am objective, I hate football too and I don't want taxes building stadiums for football teams so all the profit goes to the players and owners, and a handful of jobs are created selling ten dollar hot dogs.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC