Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill O'Reilly one of the intellectual authors of Tiller's murder:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 12:11 PM
Original message
Bill O'Reilly one of the intellectual authors of Tiller's murder:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, my. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Murderer!
I'm so fucking sick of the right wing terrorists hi-jacking our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. as long as they keep serving corporate interests...
....they'll keep foisting them on America via the screens and speakers that they own...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Is there anywhere we can get facts to counter this?
I see from his Wiki article that he was acquitted of any charges ever brought against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. How do you counter made-up absolute insanity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Well, with the facts.
The fact is Tiller was never charged with these items, and if there had been evidence, the Kansas attorney general would have been happy to charge Tiller with things like covering up child rape. He never did, so that's enough for me to recognize that Bill O'Reilly is full of it. (Actually, I start with that notion right off the bat.)

I was wondering, though, if anyone had dug deeper into these allegations and shown them to be false with the facts. That's like proving a negative, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Looks like Billo got his wish
"We're going to try to stop ... we're not going to let up... believe me, we will stay on this story. This is horrendous."

"...If we allow Dr. George Tiller and his acolytes to continue, we can no longer pass judgment on any behavior by anybody."

I think he should be brought in for questioning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. nope
it's free speech.

if i,as a cop, were to "bring him in for questioning", i would be fired and sued for civil rights violations.

as i should be.

advocating, especially as a "political pundit" that somebody be 'stopped' is not a crime.

it's called free speech.

amazes me how many people here are willing to gut the constitution for a little "safety".

no different than bushco et al.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. So I guess when Michael Reagan called for the murder of Mark Dice
Edited on Sun May-31-09 01:34 PM by TheWatcher
On the air, and said he'd "pay for the bullets", and was completely serious about it, and made open threats to murder another person on a national radio show, you'd call THAT Free Speech as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. i would have to see specifics of the transcripts, etc.
but that's not what we are talking about here.

we were talking about tiller and oreilly

and nobody has posted anything remotely illegal that oreilly said.

free speech matters.

TRUE civil rights advocates, of which many here are not, advocate free speech even for those we strongly disagree with.

and the final point. hate speech is not illegal (in the US).

do i think this is a good thing?
yes

does this make us better (in this regard) than most of the rest of the world?

yes

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Wrong. We are talking about "free speech"
what limitations, if any, should be on it.

Your turn now to insult me again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. not at all
when people are saying oreilly should be brought in for questioning, that hate speech should be banned, etc. that is what i am responding to.

we already know what the limits on speech are. there is ample case law to that effect.

and it is clear that nothing i have seen posted from oreilly transcripts is even REMOTELY close to illegal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. yet inciting imminent lawless action is not protected
from wiki, as you kindly provided elsewhere.
"The First Amendment holding in Schenck was later overturned by Brandenburg v. Ohio, which limited the scope of banned speech to that which would be directed to and likely to incite imminent lawless action (e.g. a riot)."

Inciting imminent lawless action (e.g. a murder) would then be banned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. of course it is
i've arrested people for that offense.

and what oreilly (and malloy and rhodes and savage) do is not incitement of imminent unlawful action.

NOBODY who understands case law would disagree that doing that is illegal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. Yes, as I figured. Only if it's Convenient.
Edited on Sun May-31-09 11:40 PM by TheWatcher
Specific transcripts.

What a trasparent little shill you are.

It was all over YouTube and EASILY accessible.

But then again isn't it CONVENIENT that Reagan had ALL existence of that program deleted from the Archives and the internet.

Luckily you can still find the video where he says it word for word.

Selective Reasoning asshat.

Off to the ignore list with you.

You're a COMPLETE waste of oxygen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I suppose
I was only half-serious.

Billo and his ilk ARE responsible for the hatred against this doctor, but I doubt there's direct connection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. you can argue that they are morally responsible
they are just not legally responsible. i don't think he's morally responsible, but i grok the argument

fwiw, there is nothing morally wrong (imo) with expressing hatred towards the actions of somebody(s) you believe are committing evil acts.

i don't believe tiller committed evil acts, but i certainly respect oreilly's right to call out evil that HE perceives.

heck, in many cases i think it's practically a moral duty to promote hatred against evil acts, if not the persons who are committing those acts (if you subscribe to the love the sinner, hate the sin thang).

if you call out what you perceive to be evil acts by somebody, and some whackjob kills that person that is moral indictment against you, imo.

i can say that i think many acts that bush did were evil.

i'm not responsible if some idjit listens to me, then goes out and commits a violent act.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. I guess it depends on the strength of the rhetoric
Edited on Sun May-31-09 06:32 PM by Canuckistanian
The radio stations in Rwanda actually encouraged people to literally slaughter their neighbors. And from what I've heard, they gave actual instructions. For that, I'd say yes, prosecute them as accessories to murder.

But in the case of Billo, you can say he might have created the atmosphere for people to disregard greater moral limits, but he didn't actually condone acts of violence.

But one's "belief" in the moral correctness does not excuse the fact that the "transgression" is still LEGAL.

If you don't think a practice is moral, then fight to get the law changed. You DON'T have the right to decide for yourself what the appropriate action is for the breach of your "morality".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. we agree
fwiw, i have seen examples of billo even creating an atmosphere where violence was ok.

i don't recall him ever even implicitly acknowledging that violence against the evil he perceives is ok.

there are LOTs of laws i disagree with, fwiw. i don't go out shooting people who enforce those laws.

heck, i am REQUIRED to enforce laws i disagree with (as well as those i agree with).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. "free speech" does not have limitations?
Edited on Sun May-31-09 04:12 PM by uppityperson
For instance, that old "yelling FIRE" in a theater item. Or, as found in Rwanda, advocating violence. Or, as has been pointed out on DU, saying something against the life of a president.

It amazes me that people think "free speech" already has no limitations.

Not going to insult by comparing to RW folks though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. There are many authors.
http://cdowk.org/advanceonline/2009/01/01/thousands-march-against-the-unthinkable/

You cannot invoke the term murder without expecting anyone to react.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mrs. Overall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. Someone should get a screen capture of this before it is removed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. not a screen capture, but here you go, don't have to go there to read it
Confronting Dr. George Tiller
November 22, 2006
The Factor has been investigating a late-term abortion clinic run by Dr. George Tiller in Wichita, Kansas. Dr. Tiller, known to his detractors as "Tiller the Baby Killer," stonewalled us when we asked over the last year if he'd performed illegal abortions and covered up child rape at his clinic. But recently the Factor learned that Tiller terminated late-term pregnancies by citing temporary "depression" on the part of the mother, and performed these abortions on girls as young as ten, never informing police these girls were victims of rape or incest.

Jumping on the story
O'Reilly laid out the details in his Talking Points Memo, on November 3rd.

"In the state of Kansas, there is a doctor, George Tiller, who will execute babies for $5,000 if the mother is depressed. And there are rapists impregnating 10-year-olds who are being protected by abortion clinics. It doesn't get worse than that. This is the absolute shame of America."

Kansas Attorney General Phill Kline (R), who'd suspected criminal activity at Tiller's clinic for some time, subpoenaed medical records of women who'd had abortions there. Kline came under fire for what some thought was an invasion of personal privacy, but he said he believed a child's privacy had already been violated if she'd been raped, and he shouldn't be prohibited from gathering evidence of the crime and seeking justice.

Kansas restricts abortions after 22 weeks of pregnancy when the fetus would be viable outside the womb, except when the pregnancy would endanger the life of the mother or severely impair a major bodily function. Kansas will also allow late-term abortions if the pregnancy would cause "substantial and irreversible impairment of a major mental function." Tiller has apparently interpreted this as meaning he can perform a late-term abortion if he diagnoses the mother as "depressed." O'Reilly decried this as "vague and undefined."

More details
The Factor has learned that Tiller was aborting babies of girls aged 10-15, including victims of forcible rape, "and those abortions were not reported to authorities as required by law," Bill said, "so the criminals who impregnated the girls have so far gotten away with it."

The guest on the Factor the night of November 3 was the aforementioned Kansas Attorney General Kline. " every single instance, there was not a late-term abortion performed on a viable child to save the life of the mother," Kline asserted, "and in every single instance, there was not an abortion performed for a physical reason." So according to the records, Tiller was using "depression" (and that, Bill concluded, "could be anything") as an excuse to terminate these pregnancies.

"When you have a 10- or 11-year-old child who is pregnant, and gets an abortion, and no one calls the police, it's likely a family member that is abusing that child," said Kline. In Kansas, sexual intercourse with a child under 14 is defined as "rape" because the child is below the age of consent, which means any pregnant girl under 14 getting an abortion at Tiller's clinic is the victim of a crime and Tiller is required to inform authorities. AG Kline indicated Tiller is not reporting the rapes, a felony under Kansas law.

The politics
Kline (R), the incumbent Attorney General, was—at that time—locked in a tight election race against Paul Morrison (D), who signaled he might drop the Tiller investigation if elected. A Factor Followup segment revealed that Tiller was tied to groups spending big money to defeat Kline and end the investigation. Tiller founded an abortion rights political action committee (PAC), "Pro Kan Do," which received over $100,000 from Tiller over the last two years, according to the Associated Press. Pro Kan Do's website actively solicits donations to oust Kline from office. Pro Kan Do was also funneling thousands of dollars to less regulated non-profit groups like "Kansans for Consumer Privacy Protection," which was spending money on mass mailings critical of Phill Kline all over the state.

The night before the election, O'Reilly interviewed Megan Mosack, a Kansas radio talk show host, one of the only people reporting on this special interest money. Mosack said Tiller was "intent on buying the office of Attorney General." Tiller's PACs and non-profits were spending $1 million to elect Paul Morrison, she estimated, and were completely "distorting" Phill Kline's record. The negative campaign mailings sent out by these non-profits called Kline "Snoop Dog" for seeking women's medical records, but Bill pointed out that the women's names were blacked out so Kline couldn't know their identity.

The confrontation on the steps
I was on assignment in the Midwest at the time, so Bill told me to travel to Topeka, Kansas and confront Tiller's attorney about the controversy involving his client's abortion clinic.

The crew and I arrived at Pedro Irigonegary's office on the afternoon of November 7th. He happened to be outside just as our van pulled in... and we sprang out with the cameras rolling.

"Do you believe that late-term babies should be terminated in the womb for 'depression'?" I asked after introducing myself.

"Look," he said, staring down at me from atop a flight of stairs. "What's important in this issue is not whether Mr. O'Reilly thinks that he is an expert on depression or not. What's important is what medical people and a woman going through a difficult process decided what's her best interest. I don't care what Mr. O'Reilly thinks."

I continued to question him about Tiller's definition of "depression" and he became agitated.

"That's the kind of junk journalism that I see from O'Reilly on a daily basis!" he argued. I told him that O'Reilly wasn't the issue and he responded, "You're talking about something to get ratings, that's all you're doing!"

I countered that his client's practices were "of questionable legality, and ethics."

"You and Mr. O'Reilly and the entire Fox network are not the individuals who should be make determinations of what is or what is not a legal abortion."

We continued back and forth for a few more minutes until Irigonegaray called me "shameful" and went back into his office.

The aftermath
The next night we aired video of the confrontation and O'Reilly interviewed Mary Kay Culp, executive director of "Kansans For Life," a pro-life organization. Culp said her statistics showed that in every late-term abortion performed since 1998, not one was performed to save the life of the mother. Furthermore, Culp alleged that Tiller and another abortionist were the ones who were making the medical determination of "depression."

"How does he terminate a fetus?" asked Bill.

"His preferred procedure is to find the baby's heart on the sonogram, inject with a poison, kill the baby and then put the mother into labor," explained Culp. The Factor obtained an official office letter signed by Dr. Tiller that seems to confirm this procedure.

"Then does what?" asked Bill.

"Reportedly, he has a funeral-sized crematorium on the property. And people that stand outside and pray report that there are days when ashes actually fall on them... I've seen the pictures with the ashes on their coats." Bill said he didn't believe this was enough to prove the allegation. Culp further claimed that an Associated Press reporter had also witnessed it, but The Factor has yet to verify this.

By the time of the show that night, challenger Paul Morrison had defeated Phill Kline by 16 points, throwing the criminal investigation of Dr. George Tiller into uncertainty. But O'Reilly promised, "We're going to try to stop ... we're not going to let up... believe me, we will stay on this story. This is horrendous."

Bill summarized in a heartfelt Talking Points Memo on Friday, November 10th: "If we as a society allow an undefined mental health exception in late-term abortions, then babies can be killed for almost any reason... This is the kind of stuff that happened in Mao's China and Hitler's Germany and Stalin's Soviet Union... If we allow this, America will no longer be a noble nation... If we allow Dr. George Tiller and his acolytes to continue, we can no longer pass judgment on any behavior by anybody."

Keep watching. There will be more.

Jesse Watters has been a producer for The OReilly Factor since 2003. Before joining Fox News, Watters worked on political campaigns and in finance. He received a B.A. in History from Trinity College (Hartford, CT) in 2001. Watters was born and raised in Philadelphia and moved to New York in 1995.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. Excuse me if I LOL.



It's just that it makes me want to laugh when I see "Bill O'Reilly"
and "intellectual" just a few words apart in the same sentence.








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. point taken....
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. LOL!
Edited on Sun May-31-09 03:32 PM by Politicalboi
Kinda like Bush intelligence. LOL! Well if he can't be charged with anything, perhaps telling his sponsors that we don't condone murder like O'Lielly does. Would be nice to see him off the air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
15. O'Reilly Is Now Officially A TERRORIST!!!!
Let him wear a label now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
17. He put a big bull's eye right on the Dr.'s back. . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC