Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There are tremendous restrictions on abortion in most states already.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 09:47 PM
Original message
There are tremendous restrictions on abortion in most states already.
NARAL has put together some links and graphs to show which states are the most restrictive. It is really quite scary how little option a woman has left despite the fact that abortion is legal in the first trimester.

The right wing has done an amazing job of limiting any choices a woman has to get an abortion, even though it is legal.

Here is the state by state chart from NARAL.

Who Decides: the status of women's reproductive rights in the United States.

Click on your state to check. Here are a couple of lists from states, Nebraska and Kansas.

Nebraska:

ANTI-CHOICE LAWS
Abortion Ban

Nebraska has an unconstitutional and unenforceable criminal ban on abortion.
Details »
Biased Counseling & Mandatory Delay

Nebraska law subjects women seeking abortions to biased counseling requirements and mandatory delays.
Details »
Counseling Ban/Gag Rule

Nebraska prohibits certain state employees or organizations receiving state funds from counseling or referring women for abortion services.
Details »
Insurance Prohibition for Abortion

Nebraska restricts insurance coverage of abortion.
Details »
Other Anti-Choice Law

Nebraska law includes a strongly anti-choice policy statement.
Details »
Refusal to Provide Medical Services

Nebraska allows certain individuals or entities to refuse to provide women specific reproductive health services, information, or referrals.
Details »
Restrictions on Low-Income Women's Access to Abortion

Nebraska restricts low-income women's access to abortion.
Details »
Restrictions on Young Women's Access to Abortion

Nebraska law restricts young women's access to abortion services by mandating parental notice.
Details »
Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers (TRAP)

Nebraska prohibits certain qualified health care professionals from performing abortions.
Details »
OTHER RELEVANT LAWS
Post-Viability Abortion Restriction

Nebraska restricts post-viability abortions.
Details »


Kansas:

ANTI-CHOICE LAWS
Biased Counseling & Mandatory Delay

Kansas law subjects women seeking abortions to biased counseling requirements and mandatory delays.
Details »
Counseling Ban/Gag Rule

Kansas prohibits certain state employees or organizations receiving state funds from counseling or referring women for abortion services.
Details »
Public Facilities Restriction

Kansas prohibits the use of some public facilities for the performance of abortions.
Details »
Refusal to Provide Medical Services

Kansas allows certain individuals or entities to refuse to provide women specific reproductive health services, information, or referrals.
Details »
Restrictions on Low-Income Women's Access to Abortion

Kansas restricts low-income women's access to abortion.
Details »
Restrictions on Young Women's Access to Abortion

Kansas law restricts young women's access to abortion services by mandating parental notice.
Details »
PRO-CHOICE LAWS
Protection Against Clinic Violence

Kansas law protects women seeking reproductive health care and medical personnel from blockades and violence.
Details »


Here is a page from NARAL with more links to maps and charts listed by topics.

And a word about the so-called "late term abortions" that are so much in the news now...with not a soul even trying to explain that they are just done for the fun and recreation of the women.

A wise doctor once said in his speech to a NARAL dinner

I'm the governor, I was the governor up 'til last week. I served on the board of Planned Parenthood of Northern New England for five years. (cheers, applause). When I became governor I had to resign because all--we contracted all our family planning services through Planned Parenthood in Vermont.

We do not hearken to the term "partial birth abortion" in my state because (applause) because partial birth abortion is like the word quota. The President used it six times last night. It's a code word. It's designed to appeal to people's fears, to divisiveness. Partial birth abortion is the same thing. (cheers, applause).

The truth is I went and checked and tried to figure out, because I was running against a conservative person the last two times I ran. I checked, because I knew this would come up, how many late, third trimester abortions had been done in the state of Vermont in the last four years. The number was--. Zero.

This is an issue about nothing; it's an issue about extremism; it's an issue about appealing to people's fears. It is the wrong thing to do and people who use the term partial birth abortion are leading an America in a bad place. (applause). They are trying to divide us people of conscience; it is the wrong thing to do. It's no more honorable for the President of the United States using the word quota, because he knows it divides us by race and use of the word partial birth abortion divides us by conscience. (cheers, applause continue).

There are many good people who on moral grounds are opposed to abortion. I respect them. I do not respect the people who defend the throwing of bombs and murders of doctors however. And some of those exist in our very administration, people who have not stood up against violence; they thought it would be better for their political careers if they didn't say too much about it. The chairman of the Judiciary Committee, last year, who refused to allow the banking bill to go through 'cause it outlawed terrorism at abortion clinics. That is a shameful act and the American people ought to be ashamed of that. .


He several spoke of what a "late term abortion" really is. What it is really about.

Howard Dean on a woman's right to choose, thread #2. n

Individual freedom should apply to abortion decision
I believe that the issue of abortion is a medical rather than a political decision. I don't see how a government regulation that tells doctors how to practice medicine can be supported. Republicans claim that they are the party of individual freedom, but they are the first to tell other people how to live their lives.
Source: Winning Back America, by Howard Dean, p.142-3 Dec 3, 2003

Q: Where do you stand on the partial birth abortion ban?
A: In the four years between 1996 & 2000 there were no late term abortions performed in my state. Late term abortions are very rare and should never be used except to save the life or health of the mother. I just don't think the government ought to be making personal medical decisions for Americans. No respectable physician would ever do a late term abortion except for the most serious reasons. That is why I did not support the President's bill
Source: Concord Monitor / WashingtonPost.com on-line Q&A Nov 6, 2003


Q: Will you rollback Bush's restrictions on stem cell research?
A: Yes. The president's anti-science bias should not be permitted to deprive Americans with Parkinson's, diabetes, and other treatable diseases of the help that they need.
Source: Concord Monitor / WashingtonPost.com on-line Q&A Nov 6, 2003

As a physician, I do not like the idea that Congress or the President think they should practice medicine. Abortion is a deeply personal decision which ought to be made between the patient, the family and physician. It's none of the government's business.
Source: Campaign web site, DeanForAmerica.com, "On the Issues" Nov 30, 2002

The notion of "partial birth abortion" is nonsense. This is a rare procedure used only to save the life or health of the mother.
Source: Campaign web site, DeanForAmerica.com, "On the Issues" Nov 30, 2002


The right wing extremists are well on their way to circumventing Roe v Wade and restricting abortions anyway.

Look at the maps of the states, see what a woman would face in your state if she excercised her option for an abortion.

In many ways the extremists have already succeeded. Kudos to Rachel and Keith tonight for calling them out. I missed The Ed Show, maybe he did as well.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. In Texas, someone in the state legislature had this bright idea...
...of requiring every abortion patient to view an ultrasound of the fetus before going through the procedure.

That bill died today, fortunately, because some schmuck tried to ram Voter ID down our throats, and that resulted in a filibuster that killed the ultrasound bill in the process. Hey, I never promised this would make any sense...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. They keep trying that in Florida as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. Such a bill (ultrasound required before an abortion) passed in freakin' dumbass Oklahoma,
unfortunately.

And now they're going to put a big-ass Ten Commandments monument on the State House grounds. Voter ID law was vetoed by the governor, so now they're going tu put it up for a referendum vote.

SIGH...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Here in TX, docs are REQUIRED to tell women they are risking breast cancer if they get an abortion.
Even though it is medically inaccurate.

Wild, huh? The state mandates that doctors lie to these women & threaten them with breast cancer.

Unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. When politicians try to practice medicine, we all have quacks for doctors.
:grr:

I wish it was unconstitutional for laws to contain blatant, known lies and falsehoods. Shit like that should be wiped off the books for being total bullshit. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. I thought Rachel was exceptional.
I know her viewership is down so perhaps she should do more programs on women's issues. We are 51% of the population and Rachel is one of just a few women with air time and a big mic.

The whole country is listening and most would be shocked to know that abortion services are not available in 87% of the counties in this country. Roe v. Wade is not really the law of the land. We need to seize this moment as a teaching opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Ditto. She was really, really good tonight. Loved her. -eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. Also take a look at SD, very extreme restrictions.
http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/choice-action-center/in_your_state/who-decides/state-profiles/south-dakota.html

Not sure of the year on this, but I doubt it has gotten better.

98 percent of South Dakota counties have no abortion provider

Political Info and Laws in Brief

Executives

* Governor M. Michael Rounds (R) is anti-choice.

Legislature

* The South Dakota House is anti-choice.
* The South Dakota Senate is anti-choice.

Abortion Bans

South Dakota has an unconstitutional and unenforceable criminal ban on abortion, and has a near-total criminal ban on abortion that would take effect if Roe v. Wade is overturned.
Details »
Biased Counseling & Mandatory Delay

South Dakota law subjects women seeking abortions to biased counseling requirements and mandatory delays.
Details »
Refusal to Provide Medical Services

South Dakota allows certain individuals or entities to refuse to provide women specific reproductive health services, information, or referrals.
Details »
Restrictions on Low-Income Women's Access to Abortion

South Dakota restricts low-income women's access to abortion.
Details »
Restrictions on Young Women's Access to Abortion

South Dakota law restricts young women's access to abortion services by mandating parental notice.
Details »
Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers (TRAP)

South Dakota subjects abortion providers to burdensome restrictions not applied to other medical professionals.
Details »
OTHER RELEVANT LAWS

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. It is tremendously scary how much legal access to abortion
has been whittled away. :(

It's scary how many people who are on the left agree with those restrictions for whatever misguided reasons. :(

I was a pro-choice escort for many years outside of a doctors office, getting women in safely past the protesters with their shouting, their threats, their signs, their bullhorns, their cameras, and all their intimidation tactics.

I have been there was Operation Rescue and local fundie churches tried to flex their muscle and create big public drama to shut places down. I have put myself physically between patients and angry anti-choicers who refused to stay the legal distance away.

This isn't an issue we can agree to disagree about. Women have a right to control their own bodies and their own reproductive choices, and those anti-choice people are fundamentally wrong. It's time for more of us to get out there on the front lines and start building the movement again overcome the restrictions they've put in place.

I'm in an electric wheelchair now. But I'll get back out there on the front lines if there's a doctor's office nearby where I'm needed. And I urge people reading this to find pro-choice action networks, or found one if there isn't one near you. Work with Planned Parenthood. Work with the doctors. Be a pro-choice escort. Be a fund-raiser for funds that help the poorest women who have to travel farthest across state lines to get abortions. Get out there get involved in ways that get you way from the keyboard. Find something that challenges you us fight back! Do something out there to help!

The more things we do out there, while still talking about it here, the more likely we are to tear down these restrictions and reclaim reproductive rights.

:grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Kudos to you for those things you did.
That was great, you should be proud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. ...
North Carolina

Political Info and Laws in Brief

Executives
Governor Beverly Perdue (D) is pro-choice.


Legislature
The North Carolina House is mixed-choice.
The North Carolina Senate is mixed-choice.
ANTI-CHOICE LAWS
Refusal to Provide Medical Services
North Carolina allows certain individuals or entities to refuse to provide women specific reproductive health services, information, or referrals.
Details »

Restrictions on Low-Income Women's Access to Abortion
North Carolina restricts low-income women's access to abortion.
Details »

Restrictions on Young Women's Access to Abortion
North Carolina law restricts young women's access to abortion services by mandating parental consent.
Details »

Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers (TRAP)
North Carolina subjects abortion providers to burdensome restrictions not applied to other medical professionals.
Details »

PRO-CHOICE LAWS
Contraceptive Equity
North Carolina law requires health insurance plans that cover prescription drugs to provide the same coverage for contraception.
Details »

Low-Income Women's Access to Family Planning
North Carolina provides certain low-income women increased coverage for Medicaid-funded reproductive health care services.
Details »

Protection Against Clinic Violence
North Carolina law protects women seeking reproductive health care and medical personnel from blockades and violence.
Details »

OTHER RELEVANT LAWS
Post-Viability Abortion Restriction
North Carolina restricts post-viability abortions.
Details »



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. NC is better than Florida in that aspect.
We are looking pretty bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shallah Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
13. TRAP Bills single out clinics for unnecessary, politically motivated, restrictive regulations
http://www.prochoice.org/policy/states/trap_laws.html

Examples

In 2006, Pennsylvania passed a law making health care providers who perform more than 100 abortions a year subject to specific regulations regarding patient safety, and imposed a fee on these providers comparable to an ambulatory surgical facility. South Dakota also mandated new licensing requirements for abortion providers and authorized the state department of health to develop specific standards for these facilities. Read NAF's 2003 Supreme Court amicus brief challenging similar TRAP regulations in South Carolina (PDF file, 191K).

What They Do

The regulations imposed by TRAP bills can include various structural requirements, such as specifications for the janitors' closets, hallway width and height, lawn care standards, or excessive staffing requirements. The bills often establish new licensing requirements for abortion clinics, subjecting clinics to heavy fees and regular inspections of facilities and records by the state, sometimes without adequate safeguards to protect patient privacy.

TRAP bills are measures calculated to chip away at abortion access through the guise of legitimate regulation. These pieces of legislation often single out abortion clinics for special regulations that similar medical facilities are not subjected to. Some TRAP bills redefine abortion clinics as hospitals or ambulatory surgical centers. By doing so, such bills subject abortion clinics to stringent regulations which are inappropriate and unnecessary for outpatient facilities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shallah Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Clinics are also driven out when cities refusing or revoking building permits
The Real Estate of Abortion Politics

The fight over building permits for the Aurora, Ill. Planned Parenthood clinic is just one more example of how the fight over reproductive health is coming down to questions of infrastructure.

http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=the_real_estate_of_abortion_politics


Which is why I was so happy to see photos of the $7.5 million Planned Parenthood clinic recently built in the Chicago suburb of Aurora, Illinois. Hoping to avert the kinds of protests that kept other new abortion clinics from opening (like when a contractor backed out of building a new Planned Parenthood facility in Austin in 2003), Planned Parenthood applied for the building permits under the name of a subsidiary, Gemini Office Development LLC. They disclosed to the planning and zoning board that the building would be occupied by a medical office, but did not specify it would be an abortion provider.

After anti-choice activists discovered that the new medical office building in Aurora was to be a reproductive health clinic, they sounded a clarion call to keep the facility from opening. Under pressure from the anti-choice movement, the city denied Planned Parenthood's occupancy permit. And yesterday, a judge declined to grant a temporary occupancy permit, meaning the new clinic (which was supposed to open on Tuesday) will remain shuttered. At the hearing, the Aurora city attorney argued that this is about land use and permit regulations -- not about restricting abortion access. Planned Parenthood lawyers responded, "We wouldn't be here if this was a foot care clinic."

It's interesting that the anti-abortion movement would go after Planned Parenthood for conducting its real estate business using a third party. Because it's a time-honored anti-choice tactic to purchase, often under a third-party name, the building that houses an abortion clinic, then to subsequently raise the rent to exorbitant amounts or to have the abortion provider evicted outright. The next step is to turn the former clinic into a "crisis-pregnancy center."

In 2000, a state senator who was a vocal abortion-rights opponent and two business partners purchased the building that houses Carhart's clinic. Almost immediately thereafter, Carhart received notices that his lease on the lower portion of the building and the parking lot would be terminated in 30 days and that his lease on the rest of the building would end in six months. As the partnership's lead investor, Bill Rotert, said at the time, "If it's possible, I'm going to close it down. I'm already pricing chain."


The Exorcists: Born-again abortion clinics

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2007/03/exorcists


When Troy Newman would answer the phone at Central Women's Services in Wichita, Kansas, last summer, there was a lot he didn't mention. The priests who'd been arrested for blocking the abortion clinic's door. The "truth truck" parked nearby with its billboard of an aborted fetus. The pickets at employees' homes. He didn't talk about how all of this had caused the clinic to shut down, save for its still- functioning phone system. He would press the receiver to his ear and intone, "Women's clinic!" And when a nervous voice at the other end of the line would inquire about abortion services, he would furrow his brow and ask, "Don't you know that's a baby?"

The best place to preach against an abortion clinic, Newman has found, is from within one. The national president of Operation Rescue, he bought the clinic—shuttered last May after the pro-life outfit had laid siege to it for more than 15 years—through a front group; now he's turning it into his organization's headquarters, complete with a prayer garden and a memorial to the 50,000 unborn children he claims were murdered there.

As pro-lifers have winnowed the number of abortion providers in America by nearly 25 percent since the early 1990s—Wichita now has just one—Operation Rescue has joined several anti-abortion groups converting clinics to their own purposes. "What better way to show that we are winning and demoralize the enemy," Newman says, "than by shutting down an abortion mill, throwing out the tenants on their face, and taking it over as our headquarters? You lose, we win."

Beyond the chest thumping, the takeover is part of a long-term strategy for the anti-abortion movement. Organizers such as Newman, the son of a San Diego Army recruiter, are seeking new converts—in particular, women, an estimated 26 million of whom have had an abortion. At the Wichita memorial, Newman says, they will be able to reflect, mourn, memorialize—even name their "babies"—and take action: "Not only can I see a plaque here with my baby's name on it, and cry here because I killed my baby here," he imagines visitors saying, "but these people in this building are dedicated to ending the holocaust, and I can join with them hand in hand."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. That Prospect article is chilling.
"After anti-choice activists discovered that the new medical office building in Aurora was to be a reproductive health clinic, they sounded a clarion call to keep the facility from opening. Under pressure from the anti-choice movement, the city denied Planned Parenthood's occupancy permit. And yesterday, a judge declined to grant a temporary occupancy permit, meaning the new clinic (which was supposed to open on Tuesday) will remain shuttered. At the hearing, the Aurora city attorney argued that this is about land use and permit regulations -- not about restricting abortion access. Planned Parenthood lawyers responded, "We wouldn't be here if this was a foot care clinic."

They have explored every avenue, haven't they?

Meanwhile our Democrats are fearful of speaking up too much on the topic, lest they get attacked as well.

Tragic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shallah Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. It is not enough to elect people to who are 'pro-choice' if they ignore the ways choice is blocked
The right wing & radical fundamentalists have organized to get people with their views elected in offices from town councils on up. Doesn't matter they haven't overturned Roe v Wade if they can just harrass and legislate clinics out of business. Doesn't matter if the gov. refuses to treat acts of terrorism directed at abortion doctors, clinics, and staff as regular crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. And remember, Democratic leaders have pushed anti-choice candidates to run
The House ran and supported 12 anti-choice candidates last year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. Again tonight, Rachel was amazing.
Great and powerful interviews.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC