Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

And now for some reality.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 08:14 AM
Original message
And now for some reality.
Obama will be nominated in 2012. The only way he won't be nominated is if something dreadful happens to him.

Nancy Pelosi will be re-elected in 2010.

If Harry Reid is defeated, it won't be by a dem or progressive, it will be a repuke who defeats him in the general.

Dems are our only alternative to the repubs on a national level. That's the reality. If you think that dems are no different than repubs, well, vote for whoever, but don't delude yourself that whoever has a spit of a chance. Until we build up third parties on a local and state level, there won't be options other than dem and repub for Congressional seats, let alone for the Presidency.

Reality may suck, but it's better than delusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Fuck reality.. Reality is killing us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Ralph Nader 2412!
Edited on Thu Jun-04-09 08:19 AM by onehandle
103rd time's a charm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Ralph Stassen.
I wonder if either Ralph or Dennis will run in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. I am quite confident that Ralph is putting his "Obama and ______ are exactly the same" campaign...
...together even as we type.

Dennis, I believe, will stay out. He's more pragmatic than many think.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sounds fatalistic
Arundhati Roy said: "Why play their game where they make all the rules and have all the power. Why not find where our own power lies .... and then use it! force them to play by our rules for a change."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. fatalistic, realistic- both are more often more accurate than
distorting the facts. Again, until we change things on the local and state level re viable third parties, we aren't going to be able to get third party candidate in Congress. Either that, or work to change the dem party to a more progressive leaning entity, understanding that that too takes electing progressives at the local and state level first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. "we" don't have the numbers
That's the fact and that's the reality. Pretty words won't change it.
Our power right now is within the system. That's also reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Which would be a General Strike...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
6. I don't think this reality sucks. Here's a bit of "reality."
America moves like an aircraft carrier, not a gazelle. We are not going to get from the far right to the center left or even further over that way in two hops and a tail shake. For eight years, we've been trapped in the wilderness of the far right. We will not be magically transported to the other side of the equation.

It's going to take time to turn the ship around, and the crew of citizens are going to have to get used to the new course that's being plotted, and they're going to have to "get onboard" with it, too.

In the interim, people will complain. It nudges the debate along, in some cases. In other cases, it doesn't. I just wish that the complainers would stick to the issues, and do a bit less messenger-shooting. That would make life more pleasant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Absolutely ( we need some nudging )
We need the "bra-burners"
That's been a favorite saying of mine since I was involved in the women's movement. My group and friends in the movement always did the "tsk-tsk", but I pointed out to them that we needed the bra-burners to attract attention and get people to notice.
( how times have changed too.. off topic, but now the gals all want to be wired and hiked up by Victoria's Secret)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. I agree--there's nothing wrong with hell raising, and I don't advocate that people
shut up and go along/get along. Burn those bras, most certainly (I guess burning girdles would have smelled like burning tires, or something...no wonder that idea never took off!).

I do recognize that things don't happen quickly in this country. It's a process.

It's sweet when we get it right, certainly. It does take time, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. That is only because we ALLOW that. We have come to accept being screwed over.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Deal

If the 'powers that be' had our interests at heart, there would be no insurmountable obstacle to rapid and dramatic change. The people in charge (on both sides of the aisle) are looking out for their own and not US. THAT and THAT ALONE is the sole impediment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Well, I guess I have to say my mileage varies considerably. I don't mind incremental change.
I am patient. I like a good rehashing of the issues, and opinions from all sides. I like consensus. This might not be fashionable here, but I'm not a fashion follower anyway.

Imagine what our lives would have been like if a Republican Congress and a Republican President were able to have their way, in radical fashion? Imagine if Bush-Cheney had been able to implement all of his desired "rapid and dramatic" changes? The first thing he probably would have done is had himself crowned King!

We'd be living in Hellville, instead of Hopeville.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. They went from a budget surplus to more debt than all previous administrations combined.
They tortured. They robbed the treasury and gave it to themselves and their cronies. They trampled our civil rights. They killed New Orleans. They put the final nails in the coffin of blue colllar Americans. They allowed the largest single terrorist attack on US soil. They started a war of aggression. They have suffered no consequences (yet). I would say they DID have their way - in a radical fashion.

Our country is on life support and needs serious help right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. We're not going to agree on this. I say if they really DID have their way,
the Constitution would have been changed to let Bush have a few more terms, or McCain would be playing proxy for Cheney. If they did have their way, they'd still be having their way. The fact that they're out of power, decisively, is a good thing.

The ship of state turns slowly. It's not a rapid-fire process. My glass is half full.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
9. Working for a third party that may not be currently viable
is not un-reality - it may not be successful, but it is something a sane person can do. It may be that the two-parties-in-one bunch will continue to perpetrate the Empire for the foreseeable future, but any wind is sweet that blows against the Empire...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. working to build third parties on the local and state level is sane.
hoping to leapfrog that step, is not particularly sane. History is there to demonstrate that. And of course, the facts argue against the repubs=dems line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. A brown wool suit is different from a blue wool suit -
you can't argue with those facts. And it makes no difference whether a citizen votes for or supports this, that, or the other party or politician; that citizen is exercising his/her duties/privileges exactly equally with any other active citizen. Surely we can all agree on that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
11. Reality = we are the lesser of two evils - stay the course
the revolution ain't happenin - and the GOP is a bit worse..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
14. Three partys?
I only see one party in this country.The party of the rulers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
17. Your candidate sucks.
:P ;) :P

*fleeing, giggling*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Good t-shirt material! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
18. Only Voting For Full Equality From Now On. No More Holding My Nose.
Edited on Thu Jun-04-09 10:23 AM by Toasterlad
If you care to join me, fine. If not, it's YOUR fault - and the fault of all the other supporters of the status quo - that nothing ever changes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. If you're talking about marriage equality, my state has it and my Senators
and rep support it, so I don't have that concern when it comes to my legislators either in Montpelier or D.C. I know that's a luxury most don't have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. No, Your State Doesn't Have It.
You won't have marriage equality until it is recognized federally. But I am happy (seriously) that your state and your senators are on the right side of this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
24. Yep...
Those interested in third party candidates need to keep up the fight, however. I think the climate is right for a viable third party, but like most worthwhile things, it takes time, money, and a lot of elbow grease. Until then, Dems are our best bet, no question.

My fear is that the first viable third party will rise from the ashes of the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
26. Some people have such short memories...
That's how we ended up with Bush in the first place! People forgot what Reagan and Bush I did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. huh? how does that relate to the OP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC