Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

17th century urine-filled 'witch bottle' found

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 01:55 PM
Original message
17th century urine-filled 'witch bottle' found

Ok...who wants to follow Coulter and Malkin around, waiting for them to take a leak?

Discovery provides a unique insight into witchcraft beliefs of that period

During the 17th century in England, someone urinated in a jar, added nail clippings, hair and pins, and buried it upside-down in Greenwich, where it was recently unearthed and identified by scientists as being the world's most complete known "witch bottle."

This spell device, often meant to attract and trap negative energy, was particularly common from the 16th to the 17th centuries, so the discovery provides a unique insight into witchcraft beliefs of that period, according to a report published in the latest British Archaeology.

Lead researcher Alan Massey, a former chemist and honorary fellow of Loughborough University, believes "the objects found in witch bottles verify the authenticity of contemporary recipes given for anti-witchcraft devices, which might otherwise have been dismissed by us as being too ridiculous and outrageous to believe."

An Old Bailey court record from 1682 documents that a husband, believing his wife to be afflicted by witchcraft, was advised by a Spitalfields apothecary to "take a quart of your Wive's urine, the paring of her Nails, some of her Hair, and such like, and boyl them well in a Pipkin."

More: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31107319/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Coulter and Malkin?
Calling them witches is an insult to half the people I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. I guess that's better than burning her at the stake
or waterboarding her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. thanks for hauling out the ugly old canard...
that a disagreeable woman must be a witch. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I would hardly call Coulter and Malkin "disagreeable"...
but each to his own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. Thank you. I said much the same in a lower thread
It's still fine to bash Pagans on this board because our ideas are so "crazy".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morrisons Ghost Donating Member (324 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #26
38. Oh I dunno...
I think just about any religion on here with the exception of Islam has been bashed here at one time or another...Christianity seems to get it's fair share as well!:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Be interesting to know how he was expected to collect that urine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Hit her with a stick until she did it
Things were simple back then for women. Do what your husband says and he won't beat you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Since chamberpots were in use at the time, it probably wasn't that difficult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. chamber pots
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Chamber pot.
People evacuated into pots and threw the results into the gutters (or out of windows - hence the term "gardez l'eau" (mind the water)).

He just needed to make sure he didn't add his own contribution during the night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Thanks for that clarification!
I wondered where the term "Gardy-loo!" came from.

People on DU know all sorts of good stuff!!! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. You're welcome.
I am a veritable font of mostly useless knowledge - and not perky enough to try out for Jeopardy . . . :eyes:

And isn't that phrase the great understatement of all time? 'Watch out for the water'??? The water? Even if you accept urine as 'water', they did other things in those pots!

Were I able to time travel, I think I'd skip the urban areas in the Middle Ages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olegramps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #12
34. It bring to mind another old saying:
He doesn't have a pot to piss in or a window to throw it out of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. Easy. Chamber pots. This WAS the 17th century, you know. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. My parents used a chamber pot!
17th century, 20th century, not so different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vadawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
35. he could use the shewee, all i gotta say is "burn the witch"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. You forgot Kartheryn Harris...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. When it said the jar was to trap negative energy
I thought they meant that the Wise Women had placed them to protect themselves from those foolish enough to be cowed by the ministers of the time and think they were "evil witches".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. That's my understanding. A "Witches Jar" was a talisman to protect the witch from negative energy.
Edited on Thu Jun-04-09 04:26 PM by shadowknows69
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. I read this out to my coworker,
who happens to follow the Old Ways, and she says that yes, that is what it was. Told me about a modern version, where you take a Mason jar, put into it shards of a broken mirror and nails. You bury several of these jars around your property and they are a form of protection--the mirrors attract negative energies and that sharp objects in the jar keep them in the jar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. I read the same ritual/spell in several Gardner based Wicca books
Except I read you should still use urine as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. I'll give her the heads up
Thanks! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Well, that said Aye, I don't really hold to most of those rituals myself anymore
It's whatever works for the person. There are other, easier ways to put your "essence" into a spell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
11. "too ridiculous and outrageous to believe"
And yet I'll bet there are DUers who are thinking "hey, I bet that works!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. It does
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
28. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. Yeah, I'll bet that whole resurrection of Jesus thing was scientifically verifiable too?
Edited on Thu Jun-04-09 04:32 PM by shadowknows69
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevenmarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. Andres Serrano would call it art.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Badgerman Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
19. OMFG! they had urine drug testing back then! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #19
36. Sure they did! People had to have full-time jobs! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
20. some trucker probably chucked it out his window
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
22. And by the way, I know that it's not one of the Big Three religions
But Wicca is a recognized religion and many of its members are a little sensitive to the whole Wizard of Oz Witch stereotype. Or is it cool if I make a picture of Zombie Jesus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malikshah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
24. I'm sure it has more medicinal value than Cheney or Bush spit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
25. Worked for me
Found two large, antique glass jugs filled with yellow liquid in the basement when we moved into our house. Yeah, two giant bottles of pee. Apparently the idiot--er, previous owner--shut off the toilets to "save water" (WTF this was a rental but not a summer cottage!) and while he worked on clearing all the junk out of the house and pitching it into a dumpster in the driveway, he emptied his bladder into two antique gallon jugs. Didn't run me off, but I have wanted to steer clear of him ever since (otherwise it'd be too tempting to turn him into a toad).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. ROFL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
semillama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
30. To be clear
It wasn't witch's urine - it was the urine of a person thought to be afflicted by witchcraft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
37. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC