Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fiber-optic public internet: court rules Monticello, MN can fund it with city bonds.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 03:58 PM
Original message
Fiber-optic public internet: court rules Monticello, MN can fund it with city bonds.
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/06/monticello-appeals-court-win.ars


The local telephone company in an 11,000-person Minnesota town objected when the town decided to lay its own fiber optic network. The telco filed a lawsuit, and then suddenly rolled out its own fiber network while the case was tied up in courts. Today, a state appeals court ruled in the city's favor (PDF); Internet access was certainly a "utility," the court said, and the city was well within its rights to finance the project as it did.

But is it too late to matter?

Fiber + bonds = lawsuit

Not satisfied with current DSL and cable offerings, the town of Monticello hatched an ambitious plan to wire up the entire community with fiber, build an interconnect station, and allow ISPs to link up to the site and offer Internet access over the city-maintained fiber links. After a vote on the measure passed in 2007, Monticello quickly moved to raise money and break ground—but was promptly sued by the local telephone provider, Bridgewater, a unit of TDS Telecom.

TDS had one main complaint: the project should not be financed with city bonds. Under Minnesota law, cities can only issue revenue bonds for certain specified reasons, including the building of "utilities." TDS charged that the project was not a utility and was instead an unfair use of government power to compete with private business. Critics charged that TDS just wanted to delay the project long enough to kill it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Badgerman Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good ol' Minnisota, them Sveedes! ol' Yonny he don't know that cities can own a utility! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC