Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LA Times: Budget knife threatens popular California programs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 08:42 PM
Original message
LA Times: Budget knife threatens popular California programs
Budget knife threatens popular state programs
Eliminating mandates for absentee ballots, aid to police and firefighters killed on duty and animal shelter rules could save $100 million. Local governments would have to pay to save them.

By Michael Rothfeld
6:39 PM PDT, June 8, 2009


Reporting from Sacramento -- Linda Soubirous understood what it meant to the families of police officers and firefighters when state lawmakers ensured that they would receive health insurance for life if their loved ones were killed in the line of duty.

She was 31, with a year-old daughter and pregnant, when her husband, a Riverside County sheriff's deputy, was killed three years earlier, in 1993. Soon after, the county compounded the devastation by cutting off the family's insurance as if he had voluntarily quit his job.

Now, Soubirous is worried that other survivors will endure the same trauma if Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger succeeds with a little-noticed plan to indefinitely suspend the 1996 law because of the state's budget crisis, along with about 30 others put in place over decades to address the needs of Californians. The laws, known as state mandates, put requirements on local governments and obligate the state to pay for them.

Some affect huge groups of people, such as the law that made absentee ballots available to voters, a privilege used by up to 60% of voters. But most, like the law for families of peace officers -- costing an estimated $1 million a year -- protect small, vulnerable groups.

"It just helped the families so much," said Soubirous, 47, who has two daughters . "It was beyond words to me. I know that the state is in just a huge mess and the governor has to make some terrible choices, but I just think that these families have already paid such a huge price." .......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-mandates9-2009jun09,0,5398115.story





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Creena Donating Member (501 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gee, thanks Arnie.
Because expediting euthanasia at the Riverside, San Bernadino, and LA shelters is the smart choice. Because refusing to test a victim for AIDS is the smart choice. Because removing protections for the mentally ill is the smart choice. I'm forever curious if ousting Grey Davis helped California.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC