Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP Whine Du Jour re Sotomayor Hearings: We'll Have To Review 76 Cases A Day

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Mr. Ected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 09:06 PM
Original message
GOP Whine Du Jour re Sotomayor Hearings: We'll Have To Review 76 Cases A Day
The Senate Republican Communications Center has put out a new objection to the scheduled hearings for Sonia Sotomayor: That this schedule represents a double standard compared to the time it took for John Roberts' hearings to begin, because it means Republicans will have to review 76 of her cases per day, beginning from the day when the nomination was announced, to be ready on the day the hearings are supposed to begin.

The key here is that Sotomayor has spent a lot longer on the bench than Roberts did. Roberts had a total of 327 cases, to be reviewed in 55 days before his hearings -- about six per day. Sotomayor has 3,625 cases, to be reviewed in 48 days, working out to a ratio of about 76.

<snip>

I did some number-crunching, and it turns out that in order to get to the same per-case ratio as Roberts, then the hearings would have to start 610 days after the initial nomination -- or a year and half from the current scheduled date. If we waited for September, which Republicans have called for, that would bring the ratio down to about 34 cases reviewed per day.

<snip>

"I think a lot of people on both sides of the aisle have acknowledged that Senate Republicans have approached this process in a very fair way," said Senate Republican Communications Center spokesman John Ashbrook, in a phone call with TPM. "And from the beginning we've been asking for one thing really, and that's an opportunity to review the record in a thorough way. And I think a lot of Democrats have agreed with us."

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/06/senate-gops-reaction-to-sotomayor-hearings-well-have-to-review-76-cases-per-day.php?ref=fpblg

Do we really have to capitulate to these rascals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Puzzler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Do we really have to capitulate to these rascals?
No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe Grassley should spend less time twittering
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pkdu Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bullshit
a. She's already been confirmed twice and her record for a great deal of those case have been thoroughly reviewed at least once if not twice.

b. Tough shit - as someone on TV today said "hire some interns" and work some weekends/holidays.

c. they have been scouring her record (again) since the day Souter announced he was resigning


...and to answer you question . No! we don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. How long did they take to review the Patriot Act?
This should be no problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC