Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In the interest of combating terrorism should Free Republic be disbanded

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 02:40 PM
Original message
In the interest of combating terrorism should Free Republic be disbanded
?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, at least a visit by the FBI with a search warrant that means
taking all of FR's servers in for forensic examination.

I wonder if Robinson has a doomsday plan for his servers. Wouldn't surprise me. They aren't on site where he lives, but a script could exist that would wipe the servers.

If things keep going as they are, we shall soon see...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The FBI could also get all the user IP addresses and from there start to track down names
getting a pretty good terrorist watch list going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I imagine they already have all that.
There have been several instances of Freepers doing evil. Fake anthrax mailings, and the like. I'm sure the FBI has it all. I remember one time, when one of those things happened, FR went down for a couple of days. Just about enough time for the FBI to clone the server's drives.

Jim Robinson used to claim that he'd never reveal user information. I don't believe he makes that claim any longer. I'm pretty sure he's been co-opted, just like the NRA and other such organizations.

The lists are made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. How about we just send them to Gitmo and Waterboard them
And honestly, I would never suggest that of anyone but hell these are the cheerleaders for waterboarding terrorists in Gitmo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That would be consistent with the golden rule
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's a good place to start
Though it will drive these guys further underground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Nah...they don't go too far underground. They think their
ideas are like manna and need to be shared. Somehow, somewhere, they just have to spew their bile in public. It's their great failing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. "MAAAAAAAAAA...we're gonna need a deeper basement!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. No way!
It's too valuable a resource to the FBI for it to be closed down.

They can sit there and gather them up one by one. Like catching fish in a barrel!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Indeed. I have no doubt that Free Republic was coopted
by the FBI a long time ago. Stormfront, too, perhaps. Funny what the threat of a prison term will do to someone's convictions. Very funny, that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
votingupstart Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. IMO - no - by giving up liberty for security we will get neither nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Have you read all the threads and suggestions of violence?
liberty does not include the right to violence or terrorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
votingupstart Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
35. you are absolutely correct - NO one has a right to commit terrorism
i assure you may post is not meant to say violence/terrorism is in any way acceptable. the point i am trying to make is that when we make laws that overly restrict the freedoms of citizens for security, we are setting ourselves up for failure because those criminals/terrorists etc, who commit violence/terrorism have no care for the laws anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. Why not? The wingers wanted to shut down Craig's list
because some freak used it to meet victims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. Nah... it makes for an excellent flycatcher
Edited on Wed Jun-10-09 02:58 PM by C_U_L8R
just like a big irresistible pile of rightwing poo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. Absolutely not.
If they want to shut down voluntarily, that would be fine by me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. The FBI needs to go through their records
Post by post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
16. Sounds like a good idea but......
If you disband FR all the nut jobs on there would just scatter to other hate websites or just start a new one. It's best to keep them isolated and in one spot, it makes it easier to keep track of those psychos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. Their members have already launched two terror attacks
so how has keeping track of them helped?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. In order to prosecute based on hate crimes
You must provide evidence of prior hateful statements and showing online postings helps with that. And 2 out of how many registered members? Also the fact that it's been around has helped spot who the extremist are such as this example. http://archive.salon.com/politics/red/2001/02/09/blue/index.htmlx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa0825 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
17. No. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
19. NO!!! Let these extremist out themselves
If we ban it or other similar sites it will be difficult to tell who the extremists are! Let them out themselves with these hate filled posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. We have had 2 terror attacks from their members
so i am not sure how the outing is helping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Fine disagree
But in interest of knowing who the extremist are let them out themselves. They'll be easier to spot, shutting down all sites will just make them harder to spot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dem629 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
21. No. I wouldn't let those people be the starting point of trashing the First Amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. They wouldn't be the starting point
The KKK was shut down through lawsuits. Terror groups are not covered by the First Amendment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spike89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. Wrong
The first ammendment applies to everyone. It doesn't apply to some forms of speech, but that is vastly different than saying some groups are not covered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
23. So basically you want us to be the flip side
of the wingers, who wanted to shut down liberty in the name of safety after 9/11?

Well fuck that. Even dumbasses have rights to free expression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. How many terror attacks does one website have to launch?
Their members are responsible for two already, how many is the cut off?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. That is the *exact* logic Freepers use to argue for laws aimed at Islam/Muslims. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. If an Islamic website posts open threats and implied threats of violence
I would shut them down as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #31
43. Then you're in the wrong country. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #26
42. Their website hasn't launched shit.
If some stupid-ass DUer does something asinine Skinner and Co aren't responsible and the government would have no place shutting this site down. The Constitution affords Freeptards the right to be jackasses all day long.

If you don't like that, perhaps you actually belong there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keroro gunsou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #23
40. a wise man once said:
"it is every american's inalienable right to make an ass of ones self. please don't abuse the privilege. gentlemen." - charles emerson winchester^3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kjackson227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
25. YES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
28. Jebus...its a dumb/dangerous idea to resort to censorship whether a Republican or a Democrat
is in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
29. Is this CensorU Wednesday or what?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. I'm beginning to think so
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. When you have no problem calling other posters trolls, fascists, out of the mainstream
or "un-American" as you once called me, maybe you shouldn't be surprised when people question your approach to improving the discourse on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Wow just one post and you managed to break 6 rules of DU
Edited on Wed Jun-10-09 05:00 PM by NJmaverick
including slander and continuing fights and lacking civility. I guess that's why you favor mob rule, as part of the mob you figure you are above the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Six seems to be your favorite number today.
And I have no idea what you mean about our mods.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
34. Unless there is actual evidence
that their website has been used to organize and facilitate violence, then no.

But much of the daily rhetoric there skirts a fine line between meaningless bluster and calls for violence against those they disagree with.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
38. No. Not at all. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
44. why do people here even give a shit about that site...?
i just don't get it.
it's the same as the people who go all ape-shit about something they saw on the faux news channel- why do people even watch that shit in the first place? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
45. To paraphrase an old cliche...
It's better to prove you are a terrorist with your words, than to be suspected of being one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
armyowalgreens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 04:12 AM
Response to Original message
46. No. I'm starting to question just how much a lot of you care about rights
Because you sure do like talking about taking them away from the right. I see the double standard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC