Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OBAMACARE: Will It Be Affordable Universal Health Care or a Government Bailout

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 09:22 PM
Original message
OBAMACARE: Will It Be Affordable Universal Health Care or a Government Bailout
OBAMACARE: Will It Be Affordable Universal Health Care or a Government Bailout for the Insurance Companies?




Miles Mogulescu
Entertainment attorney, Academy Award-nominated filmmaker, writer, activist
Posted: June 9, 2009 05:27 PM

According to recent reports, President Obama plans to play a bigger role in shaping health care reform legislation being formulated in the Senate and House.

The questions is will Obama's personal involvement lead to more robust health care reform which will make significant progress towards affordable universal care? Or, in the name of gaining support from the health insurance lobby and the "moderate" Republicans and "centrist" Democrats to whom it has contributed so much money, will Obama allow so many compromises that health care reform turns into a government bailout for the insurance industry?

Several administration quotes in the New York Times leave reason for concern. According to Rahm Emanuel, "The only nonnegotiable principle is success. Everything else is negotiable." According to the ranking Senate Finance Committee Republican Sen. Charles Grassley (a staunch opponent of a viable pubic option) in a meeting with Grassley and Democratic Senate Finance Committee chair Max Baucus (who has refused to commit to a public option) Obama said "Yeah, it's a problem. If I get 85% of what I want with a bipartisan vote or 100 percent with 51 votes, all Democrat, I'd rather have it be bipartisan." Possible translation--we may be willing to give up a viable public option, mandate that every American buy private insurance, and tax workers for their employer-provided health care, if it will get a bill passed with some Republican votes.

There is a version of health care reform that would be very much to the liking of the for-profit health insurance industry and is very much in line with proposals being discussed by health insurance shills in Congress like Baucus and Grassley who have received huge campaign contributions from the for-profit health care industry.

~Snip~

The question now is, having taken single payer off the table, how far is the Obama administration and its progressive supporters--both in Congress and in the grassroots movement--willing to further compromise in order to say that they passed some kind of health reform bill? Will they continue to say that "everything is negotiable?" Or will they say that unless there is a robust public option, a viable means to finance subsidies to the uninsured to buy insurance, waivers to any individual mandate for those who can't afford insurance, and continued tax-deductibility of employer-provided health care, Obama will veto the bill, key House and Senate liberals will vote against the bill, and the progressive movement will oppose it?

Unless Obama, Congressional liberals, and the progressive movement are prepared to draw a line in the sand behind these key, non-negotiable, reform principals, the health industry lobby will eat their lunch, health care reform will turn into a government bailout for the insurance companies, and over the next few years the public may turn against Democrats who allowed such a flawed form of health care reform to become law. It won't be a matter of the "perfect being the enemy of the good" but of the bad being the enemy of the even worse.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/miles-mogulescu/obamacare-will-it-be-affo_b_213430.html


I have to ask - why are these lobbyists even given a seat at the table here? Common sense says they will not go quietly into the night. The last sentence in bold is what I fear will happen - and I think they see the train wreck coming, and don't really care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Pelosi has said that no bill will come out of the Congress without a public option.
In an interview on "the Ed Show" today.

It's something...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I hope Pelosi has the pull to do that -
But you know the minute it hits the Senate Floor, it will be changed and twisted beyond recognition. The ConservaDems are going to make sure there isn't a public option, and with friends like Baucus, there won't be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Toad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Something labeled a "public option,"
even something that meets the criteria set out by Dean and Obama, can still be worthless - and damage our chances at real reform for at least a decade.

All a public option means is that there is government administration - rather than administration by a "for-profit"

It can still charge premiums.
It doesn't have to have sliding scale/income based subsidies or premiums.

In addition, it can be structured so it will be the expensive dumping ground for everyone the insurance companies don't want to cover as long as:
Insurance companies are permitted to reject applicants based on their health status
Insurance companies are permitted to restrict access to favorable plans based on their health status
Insurance companies are permitted to price their plan based on health status

Every single feature above is consistent with Dean's and Obama's statements on public health options - and individually or combined would doom a public option to failure.

Any old public option is not enough. A public option MUST expressly require BOTH insurance companies and the public option to accept all applicants, and must forbid BOTH from basing the premium on health status. To be affordable, at least the public health option must have premiums based on income, or subsidies for those who cannot afford the premiums.

Without the above, a public option is not a significant advance over what HIPPA provided 10 or so years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. A public option isn't good enough Nancy.
A public option could be the same old Medicaid that you have to be almost homeless to qualify for. I wish Ed had put her feet to the fire on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. there may be a 'public option'
but you can bet the farm the insurance companies will still make out the fucking blood sucking bandits they are, and the American health care system will continue to be the most costly and unwieldy in the world, with more bureaucracy than carters has little pills.

Without a single payer universal coverage we are condemning ourselves to a third rate health delivery system that costs far more than it should and leaves the most vulnerable w/o the ability to go see a doctor when sick or buy meds when needed.

I admire Obama for taking this on, but you can't half-ass this issue and expect any kind of success.

Get rid of the motherfucking insurance companies. They don't heal, they comfort, they don't cure, they don't change the bedpans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I want them out of the picture myself -
Your sentiment sums it up perfectly:

They don't heal, they comfort, they don't cure, they don't change the bedpans.


:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. I am still a total skeptic on the whole thing.
Actually fixing this thing means dismantling a trillion dollar profit machine. As much as I support the President, I'll believe it when I see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
7. knr nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
9. k & r
Look for your own health insurance premiums to rise sharply and, as someone up thread stated, Obama's plan to become a dumping ground for those unable to get insurance from health insurance companies. Something that hasn't been talked about very much is the effect that an expensive health problem can have on your chances of continuing to be employed by your employer. Some of them have been known to fire people if they are thought to be the cause of the company's health insurance premiums to go up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SinglePayerActivist Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. How to stop the train wreck and get health care ... with relatively easy citzen democratic actions
Edited on Sat Jun-13-09 01:57 PM by SinglePayerActivist
To help stop the train wreck AND
to help get what we need ...

Citizens can now go to http://www.medicareforall.org

President Obama told us over two years ago how to get his support. He said that he must have a MANDATE from people: a massive action of citizens. As per his very specific recommendation, we must send letters via the U.S. Mail from every U.S. Congressional district. Barack Obama said 1-2 thousand at that meeting in 2007, but the health insurance industry power would justify us doing a little more than that. Participants numbering 2,299 per districts in 435 districts means that we will have a Million Letters for Health Care campaign. That campaign is exactly what is supported by the Medicare for All website, linked above.

In other words, the President of the United States asked us two years ago to participate in the democratic process by communicating to U.S. Representatives by letters in the U.S. Mail. At that time he SPECIFICALLY referred to the lobbyists for special interests, very clearly indicating that his recommendation of sending letters is required to have the power of the people become greater than the power of the lobbyists. His office staff confirmed, via multiple contacts to them, that he meant letters in the U.S. Mail.

Do it NOW! Please! And get others to sign up! Just refer them to the above website and recommend to them that they sign up.

(By the way, it is a myth that it takes any more than 5-7 days to send a letter to the U.S. Congress. I met with and then later called the managers at the U.S. Capitol mailroom; most mail arrives within 5-7 days, not the rumored 4-6 weeks or "up to 3 months" or other wrong information based apparently on something that occurred 6-7 years ago!).

(If you require details about what he said, including listening to audios and/or reading the text, go to the website.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. or a backdoor defunding of medicare/medicaid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC