Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OUTLAW ORGANIC FARMING (bill HR 875)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 02:21 PM
Original message
OUTLAW ORGANIC FARMING (bill HR 875)
Edited on Thu Jun-11-09 02:27 PM by Kablooie
I received this email from an organic farmer that was sent to their customers today:

US House and Senate are about to vote on a bill that will OUTLAW ORGANIC FARMING (bill HR 875).
There is an enormous rush to get this into law before people realize what is happening. Main backer and lobbyist is Monsanto – chemical and genetic engineering giant corporation (and Cargill, ADM, and
about 35 other related agri-giants). This bill will require organic farms to use specific fertilizers and poisonous insect sprays dictated by the newly formed agency to "make sure there is no danger to the public food supply". This will include backyard gardens that grow food only for a family and not for sales.
If this passes then NO more heirloom clean seeds will be available but only Monsanto genetically altered seeds that are now showing up with unexpected diseases in humans. The name on this outrageous food plan is:
Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009 (bill HR 875).

WHAT CAN YOU DO????

Get on that phone and burn up the wires. Get anyone else you can to do the same thing. The House and Senate WILL pass this if they are not massively threatened with loss of their position.... They only fear your voice and your vote. When you call their office someone will answer the phone, just tell them (politely) that you are calling to express your views on HR 875. Tell them your views, they'll take your name and address and pass your comments along to the congressperson. Here is contact info:

http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm?State=CA http://www.house.gov/writerep


We appreciate your support of organic farming and local sustainable agriculture!

Karissa Lystrup
Heavenly Acre
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. why would you outlaw organic farming??? how can they do that??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. They can't.
It's not a crime to use organic methods no matter what Monsanto's lobbyists say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor Cynic Donating Member (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Beware emails floating around on the Internets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GKirk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. My first thought was the same thing...
...people see the name Monsanto and a ridiculous story and they are instantly ready to believe anything.


From http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-875
"To establish the Food Safety Administration within the Department of Health and Human Services to protect the public health by preventing food-borne illness, ensuring the safety of food, improving research on contaminants leading to food-borne illness, and improving security of food from intentional contamination, and for other purposes."

And a summary: (I don't see Monsanto listed in there at all)

2/4/2009--Introduced.
Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009 - Establishes in the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) the Food Safety Administration. Assigns all the authorities and responsibilities of the Secretary of Health and Human Services related to food safety to the Administrator of Food Safety.
Transfers to the Administration all functions of specified federal agencies that relate to the administration or enforcement of food safety laws. Renames the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) the Federal Drug and Device Administration.
Directs the Administrator to: (1) administer a national food safety program; and (2) ensure that persons who produce, process, or distribute food prevent or minimize food safety hazards. Sets forth requirements for the Administrator to carry out such duties, including: (1) requiring food establishments to adopt preventive process controls; (2) enforcing performance standards for food safety; (3) establishing an inspection program; (4) strengthening and expanding foodborne illness surveillance systems; (5) requiring imported food to meet the same standards as U.S. food; and (6) establishing a national traceability system for food.
Requires the Administrator to: (1) identify priorities for food safety research and data collection; (2) maintain a DNA matching system and epidemiological system for foodborne illness identification, outbreaks, and containment; (3) establish guidelines for a sampling system; (4) establish a national public education program on food safety; (5) conduct research on food safety; and (6) establish a working group on foodborne illness surveillance.
Requires the Secretary, acting through the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), to develop the Food-Borne Illness Health Registry.
Directs the Comptroller General to report on the federal resources being dedicated to foodborne illness and food safety research.
Sets forth provisions regarding prohibited acts, recalls, penalties for violations of food safety laws, whistleblower protections, and civil actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Ridiculous story or not, it doesn't mean Monsanto is not involved with it -
if I'm reading it correctly it would seem that major agribusiness would profit a LOT by the KILLING of this bill.

(1) administer a national food safety program; and (2) ensure that persons who produce, process, or distribute food prevent or minimize food safety hazards.

IOW, regulation - something they've been fighting for years.

(2) maintain a DNA matching system and epidemiological system for foodborne illness identification, outbreaks, and containment;

IOW, be able to figure out just who is at fault in an e-coli outbreak.

don't know about anybody else, but it makes ME think 'misinformation campaign'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. More to the point, assume all email forwards are wrong (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. SpamAssassin is your friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
get the red out Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Snopes.com says that is mostly urban legend
Edited on Thu Jun-11-09 02:26 PM by get the red out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Check Snopes first, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Snopes is your friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. I really hate going to snopes lately
Even with the pop-up blocker, I get pup-ups from the site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. Congressional Record Summary
2/4/2009--Introduced.

Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009 - Establishes in the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) the Food Safety Administration. Assigns all the authorities and responsibilities of the Secretary of Health and Human Services related to food safety to the Administrator of Food Safety.

Transfers to the Administration all functions of specified federal agencies that relate to the administration or enforcement of food safety laws. Renames the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) the Federal Drug and Device Administration.

Directs the Administrator to: (1) administer a national food safety program; and (2) ensure that persons who produce, process, or distribute food prevent or minimize food safety hazards. Sets forth requirements for the Administrator to carry out such duties, including: (1) requiring food establishments to adopt preventive process controls; (2) enforcing performance standards for food safety; (3) establishing an inspection program; (4) strengthening and expanding foodborne illness surveillance systems; (5) requiring imported food to meet the same standards as U.S. food; and (6) establishing a national traceability system for food.

Requires the Administrator to: (1) identify priorities for food safety research and data collection; (2) maintain a DNA matching system and epidemiological system for foodborne illness identification, outbreaks, and containment; (3) establish guidelines for a sampling system; (4) establish a national public education program on food safety; (5) conduct research on food safety; and (6) establish a working group on foodborne illness surveillance.

Requires the Secretary, acting through the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), to develop the Food-Borne Illness Health Registry.

Directs the Comptroller General to report on the federal resources being dedicated to foodborne illness and food safety research.

Sets forth provisions regarding prohibited acts, recalls, penalties for violations of food safety laws, whistleblower protections, and civil actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I like that part...the new agency.
Edited on Thu Jun-11-09 02:36 PM by Why Syzygy
There was a previous news story suggesting that would be the plan, and I think it's a good one.

But, how can so many people be wrong about this bill?

http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/t/1128/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=26714

..Well I just noticed that site links to another which is much more radical than "democracy in action" would lead one to believe. :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. Here's the text of the bill. Where does it do what is being claimed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. If anything we should be supporting this bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Time to get the tin hats out: if you were a big food producer and you
wanted this bill killed, how better than to spread rumors about the bill via the internet?

A few years back, the EPA was going to conduct a long range study comparing general health and school achievement of children from pesticide free homes and children from homes where pesticides are regularly used. If any child was found to have a higher blood level of pesticide than current "safe" limits, then that child would be dropped from the study and the family counseled to ease up on the pesticides.

As far as I know, this study was killed after the outcry over exposing kids to pesticides, even though their own families already were and presumably still are the source of that exposure. I've always thought the chemical industry killed this study because it might have shown long term ill effects from pesticide use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. That's a thought worth consideration.
It could be a neat & clean way to kill it without leaving evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
14. Lame bullshit.
Read first, then post hysterically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yunomi Donating Member (167 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
17. Some quick checking around
makes it clear that this is some sort of misinformation campaign, industry guided or not. Now the thing to think about, is that people are willing to believe that Monsanto et.al. can and will try to outlaw organic farming. This is a good thing (that we believe), because small and organic farms are under constant attack of one sort or another from chemical companies and agribusiness. Monsanto may not be up to something this time, but it sure pays to watch them closely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
20. Not this shit again.
Do you people just believe anything that sounds scary and has the word "Monsanto" in it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
create.peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-11-09 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
21. while it is not a 'good' bill, it is blamed for a lot of things not in it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC