Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Rigged Election---Iran's Ex-Foreign Minister Yazdi: It's A Coup

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 10:24 AM
Original message
A Rigged Election---Iran's Ex-Foreign Minister Yazdi: It's A Coup
Edited on Sat Jun-13-09 10:26 AM by kpete
Iran's Ex-Foreign Minister Yazdi: It's A Coup
posted by Robert Dreyfuss on 06/13/2009 @ 07:24am

It's Saturday afternoon in Tehran, and the streets are generally quiet. But the aftermath of Iran's rigged election, in which radical-right President Ahmadinejad and his paramilitary backers were kept in office, has left Iran's capital steeped in anger, despair, and bitterness.

Last night, after the polls closed, heavily armed troops from the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps were in evidence in the streets. In one area of north Tehran, where backers of opposition challenger and reformist ex-Prime Minister Mousavi are concentrated, I saw a convoy of at least fifteen military vehicles filled with armed guards idling along the side of the road. The street in front of the Interior Ministry, where votes are counted, is blocked and heavily guarded after rumors that Mousavi supporters might gather there to protest the election count.

Mousavi himself has pledged to fight the verdict, using words like "tyranny" and adding, "I will not surrender to this dangerous charade."

To get some perspective on the crisis, today I went to see Ibrahim Yazdi, a leading Iranian dissident and Iran's foreign minister in the early days of Islamic republic. Here is the text of the interview:

read interview:
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/dreyfuss/443348

also more info here:

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/6/13/741967/-Early-Report:-Ahmadinejad-is-Trying-to-Steal-the-Irani-Election.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090613/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_iran_election;_ylt=AoOGj1h404z31_3Gx6EOCsKs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTJoZGJlbHVhBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMDkwNjEzL21sX2lyYW5fZWxlY3Rpb24EY3BvcwMxBHBvcwMyBHNlYwN5bl90b3Bfc3RvcnkEc2xrA2lyYW5kZWNsYXJlcw--

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/12/iran-election-results-ahm_n_214975.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good thing BushCo & Republicans, Inc. is history... Bad history.
Or we would have been watching round the clock coverage of our new Iranian War.

Doh! That's right! Dead Eye Dick would have already been directing military strikes in the Iranian War months ago, from his bunker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. We should watch and see how they act in Iran when their elections get stolen
Somehow, I really don't think they will react the same way we did.
I am sure blood will be shed. We weren't willing to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Those streets were made for more than moving automobiles
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. From that Nation article:
.
.
.
There were many, many irregularities. They did not permit the candidates to supervise the election or the counting of the ballots at the polling places. The minister of the interior announced that he would oversee the final count in his office, at the ministry, with only two aides present.

In previous elections, they announced the results in each district, so people could follow up and make a judgment about the validity of the figures. In 2005, there were problems: in one district there were about 100,000 eligible voters, and they announced a total vote of 150,000. This time they didn't even release information about each particular district.

I don't think they'll be able to keep a lid on that for very long!
.
.
.

pnorman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC